Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T10:34:00.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Encoding information: unique Natufian objects from Hayonim Cave, Western Galilee, Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

O. Bar-Yosef  and
A. Belfer-Cohen
O. Bar-Yosef
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Peabody Museum, 11 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge MA 02138, USA, obaryos@fas.harvard.edu
A. Belfer-Cohen
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scoupus 91905, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New incised bone and limestone Natufian objects discovered during the 1997 season of excavations at Hayonim cave (Western Galilee, Israel), as well as a bone object found earlier in Kebara cave (Mount Carmel), indicate direct connections between the two sites. The incised pattern on the slab is interpreted as supportive evidence for emerging territoriality among Natufian communities in the Levant.

Keywords

NatufianartHayonimIsraelLevant
Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 73 , Issue 280 , June 1999 , pp. 402 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahn, P.G. & Vertut, J.. 1988. Images of the Ice Age. New York (NY): Facts On File.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. 1983. The Natufian of the Southern Levant, in Smith, P.E.L. & Mortensen, P. (ed.), The hilly flanks and beyond: 11–42. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. 1991. The archaeology of the Natufian Layer at Hayonim Cave, in Bar-Yosef, & Valla, (ed): 81–92.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. 1997. Symbolic expressions in later prehistory of the Levant: why are they so few?, in Conkey, et al. (ed.): 161–87.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. & Belfer-Cohen, A.. 1989. The origins of sedentism and farming communities in the Levant, Journal of World Prehistory 40(3): 447–98.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. & Belfer-Cohen, A.. 1992. From foraging to farming in the Mediterranean Levant, in Gebauer, A.B. & Price, T.D. (ed.), Transition to agriculture: 21–48. Ann Arbor (MI): International Monographs in Prehistory.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. & Meadow, R.H.. 1995. The origins of agriculture in the Near East, in Price, T.D. & Gebauer, A.B. (ed.), Last hunters, first farmers: new perspectives on the prehistoric transition to agriculture: 39–94. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. & Tchernov, E.. 1970. The Natufian bone industry of Hayonim Cave, Israel Exploration Journal 20: 141–50.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O. & Valla, F.R., (ed.). 1991. The Natufian culture in the Levant. Ann Arbor (MI): International Monographs in Prehistory.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O., Vandermeersch, H., Arensburg, B. Belfer-Cohen, A. Goldberg, P. Laville, H. Meignen, L. Rak, Y. Speth, J.D. Tchernov, E.-M. Tillier, A. & Weiner, S.. 1992. The Excavations in Kebara Cave, Mt Carmel, Current Anthropology 33: 497–55Ü.Google Scholar
Belfer-Cohen, A. 1988. The Natufian settlement at Hayonim. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Belfer-Cohen, A. 1991a. Art items from layer B, Hayonim Cave: a case study of art in a Natufian context, in Bar-Yosef, & Valla, (ed.): 569–88.Google Scholar
Belfer-Cohen, A. 1991b. The Natufian in the Levant, Annual Review of Anthropology 20: 167–86.Google Scholar
Belfer-Cohen, A. & Bar-Yosef, O.. 1981. The Aurignacian in Hayonim Cave, Pa Morient 7(2): 19–42.Google Scholar
Bosinski, G. 1984. Die Kunst der Eiszeit in Deutschland und in der Schweiz. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Campana, D.V. 1991. Bone implements from Hayonim Cave: some relevant issues, in Bar-Yosef, & Valla, (ed): 459–66.Google Scholar
Cauvtn, J. 1997. Naissance des divinités Naissance de l’agriculture: La revolution des symbols au Néolithique. Paris: CNRS. Revised edition.Google Scholar
Cauvin, M-C. 1991. Du Natoufien au Levant Nord? Jayroud et Mureybet (Syrie), in Bar-Yosef, & Valla, (ed.): 295–314.Google Scholar
Conkey, M., Soffer, O., Etra-Mann, D. & Jablonski, N.G. (ed.). 1997. Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol. San Francisco (CA): California Academy of Sciences. Memoir 23.Google Scholar
D’Errico, F. 1992. Technology, motion, and the meaning of Epipaleolithic art, Current Anthropology 33(1): 94–109.Google Scholar
Edwards, P.C. 1991. Wadi Hammeh 27: an Early Natufian site at Pella, Jordan, in Bar-Yosef, & Valla, (ed.): 123–48.Google Scholar
Frolov, B.A. 1981. L’art paléolithique: Préhistoire de la science? Paper presented at the Xth Congress UISPP, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Garrod, D.A.E. 1937. Notes on some decorated skeletons from the Mesolithic of Palestine, Annual Report of the British School at Athens 37: 123–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, D.A.E. 1957. The Natufian culture: The life and economy of a Mesolithic people in the Near East, Proceedings of the British Academy 43: 211–27.Google Scholar
Garrod, D.A.E. & Bate, D.M.A.. 1937. The Stone Age of Mt Carmel 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gladkih, M.I., Komietz, N.L. & Soffer, O.. 1984. Mammoth-bone dwellings on the Russian Plain, Scientific American 251: 136–42.Google Scholar
Goren-Inbar, N. 1986. A figurine from the Acheulian site of Berekhat Ram, Mi’tetufat Ha’even (Bulletin of the Israel Prehistoric Society) 19: 7–12.Google Scholar
Goren-Inbar, N. 1995. The early Natufian occupation at el-Wad, Mt Carmel, reconsidered, in Otte, M. (ed.), Nature et culture 1: 417–28. Liège: ERAUL. 68.Google Scholar
Henry, D.O. 1989. From foraging to agriculture: the Levant at the end of the Ice Age. Philadelphia (PA): University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Layton, R. 1992. The anthropology of art. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press. 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Marshack, A. 1972. The roots of civilization. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Marshack, A. 1997a. The Berekhat Ram figurine: a late Acheulian carving from the Middle East, Antiquity 71: 327–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshack, A. 1997b. Paleolithic image making and symboling in Europe and the Middle East: A comparative review, in Conkey, et al. (ed.): 53–91.Google Scholar
Neuville, R. 1951. Le Paléolithique et le Mésolithique du Desert de Judée. Paris: Archives de l’Institut de Paleontologie Humaine.Google Scholar
Noy, T. 1991. Art and decoration of the Natufian at Nahal Oren, in Bar-Yosef, & Valla, (ed.): 557–68.Google Scholar
Perrot, J. 1966. Les gisements Natoufiens de Mallaha (Eynan), Israel, L’Anthropologie 70(5–6): 437–83.Google Scholar
Roberts, M.N. & Roberts, A.F.. 1996. Memory — Luba art and the making of history. New York (NY): Prestei, The Museum for African Art.Google Scholar
Soffer, O. & Conkey, M.. 1997. Studying ancient visual cultures, in Conkey, et al. (ed.): 1–16.Google Scholar
Stordeur, D. 1992. Change and cultural inertia: from the analysis of data to the creation of a model, in Gardin, J-C. & Peebles, C.S. (ed.), Representations in archaeology: 205–22. Bloomington (IN): Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Svoboda, J. 1997. Symbolisme gravettien en Moravie. Espace, temps et formes, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Ariège-Pyrénées 52: 87–104.Google Scholar
Turville-Petre, F. 1932. Excavations at the Mugharet El-Kebarah. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 62: 270–76.Google Scholar
Valla, ER. 1995. The first settled societies — The Natufian (12,500–10,200 BP), in Levy, T.E. (ed.), The archaeology of society in the Holy Land: 170–87. London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Valla, F.R., Plisson, H. & Baxo, R.. 1989. Notes préliminaires sur les fouilles en cours sur la Terrace d’Hayonim, Paleorient 15(1): 245–57.Google Scholar
Weinstein-Evron, M. & Belfer-Cohen, A.. 1993. Natufian figurines from the New Excavations of the el-Wad Cave, Mt Carmel, Israel, Rock Art Research 10: 102–6.Google Scholar