Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:34:49.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An early medieval symbol carved on a tree trunk: pathfinder or territorial marker?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2010

Dagmar Dreslerová
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology ASCR Praha v.v.i., Letenská 4, 11801 Praha 1, Czech Republic (Email: dreslerova@arup.cas.cz)
Radek Mikuláš
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology ASCR v.v.i., Rozvojová 269, 16502 Praha 6, Czech Republic (Email: mikulas@gli.cas.cz)

Abstract

The chance discovery of a carved symbol on a waterlogged tree of the six–ninth century AD may be the earliest mark on a living tree that has so far come to light. Given its rarity, an obvious interpretation remains elusive, but the authors review a wide range of possibilities from analogies ancient and modern. Symbols on trees have been used to mark trails, the ownership of land and resources, and all manner of votive moments from superstitious sign-making, worship of a god, thanks for a successful hunt or the memory of a loving tryst.

Type
Research articles
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbé, J.L. 2006. A la conquête des étangs: l'aménagement de l'espace en Languedoc méditerranéen (XIIe-XVe siècle). Toulouse: Presses universitaires du Mirail.Google Scholar
Andersson, R. 2005. Historical land-use information from culturally modified trees. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Andersson, R., Östlund, L. & Lundqvist, R.. 2005. Carved trees in grazed forests in boreal Sweden—analysis of remaining trees, interpretation of past land-use and implications for conservation. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 14: 149–58.Google Scholar
Beranová, M. 2005. Jídlo a pití v pravěku a ve středověku. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Černý, M., Pařez, J. & Malík, Z.. 1996. Ruůstové a taxační tabulky hlavních dřevin České republiky (smrk, borovice, buk, dub). Ústav pro výzkum lesních ekosystémů. Jílové u Prahy.Google Scholar
Dreslerová, D., Břízová, E., Růžičková, E. & Zeman, A.. 2004. Holocene environmental processes and alluvial archaeology in the middle Labe (Elbe) valley, in Gojda, M. (ed.) Ancient landscape, settlement dynamics and non-destructive archaeology: Czech research project 1997-2002: 121–71. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Guérard, B.E.C. 1857. Cartulaire de l'Abbaye de Saint-Victor de Marseille (Collection de documents inédits sur l'histoire de France. sér. 1. Collection des cartulaires de France 9: document no. 898, 411-13, 18 février 1176; fo. 138–39 du cartulaire original). Paris: M. Guérard.Google Scholar
Hill, O & Töve, J.. 2006. De gamle och skogen (Kulturarvet i skoglandskapet). Stockholm: Sweaskog.Google Scholar
Hooke, D. 1990. Worcestershire Anglo-Saxon charter-bounds (Studies in Anglo-Saxon History 2). Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
Jordan, P. 2003. Material culture and sacred landscape: the anthropology of the Siberian Khanty (Archaeology of Religion 3). Walnut Creek (CA): Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Kalicki, T. & Krapiec, M.. 1995. Problems of dating alluvium using buried subfossil tree trunks: lessons from the black oaks of the Vistula Valley, Central Europe. The Holocene 5: 243–50.Google Scholar
Kelly, F. 2000. Early Irish farming: a study based mainly on the law-texts of the 7th and 8th centuries AD (Early Irish Law series 4). Dublin: School of Celtic Studies, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Marsina, R. (ed.) 2003. V královstve svateho Štefana: vznik uhorského štátu a čas arpádovských králov (Pramene k dejinám Slovenska a Slovákov 3). Bratislava: Literarne informacni centrum.Google Scholar
Meduna, P. 2008. Konec lesního prasete, in Pokorný, P. & Bárta, M. (ed.) Něco překrásného se končí. Kolapsy v přírodě a společnosti: 145–56. Praha: Dokořán.Google Scholar
Nenninger, M. 2001. Die Römer und der Wald: Untersuchungen zum Umgang mit einem Naturraum am Beispiel der römischen Nordwestprovinzen (Geographica Historica 16). Stuttgart: Steiner F..Google Scholar
Oliver, J. 2007. Beyond the water's edge: towards a social archaeology of landscape on the Northwest Coast. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 31: 127.Google Scholar
Östlund, L., Berman, I. & Zackrisson, O.. 2004. Trees for food—a 3000 year record of subarctic plant use. Antiquity 78: 278–86.Google Scholar
Öostlund, L., Ericsson, T.S., Zackrisson, O. & Andersson, R.. 2003. Traces of past Saami forest use: an ecological study of culturally modified trees and earlier land-use within a boreal forest reserve. Scandinavia Journal of Forest Research 18: 7889.Google Scholar
Petrbok, J. 1937. Zkamenělý prales pod Labem. Národní politika 7 September 1937.Google Scholar
Profantová, N. & Profant, M.. 2000. Encyklopedie slovanských bohů a mýtů. Praha: Libri.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. 1996. The origins of virtue. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Růžičková, E. & Zeman, A. (ed.). 1994. Holocene flood plain of the Labe rive: contemporary state of research in the Czech Republic. Prague: Geological Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Spurk, M., Leuschner, H.H., Baillie, M.G.L., Briffa, K.R. & Friedrich, M.. 2002. Depositional frequency of German sub-fossil oaks: climatically and non-climatically induced fluctuations in the Holocene. The Holocene 12(6): 707715.Google Scholar
Szabó, P. 2005. Woodland and forests in medieval Hungary (British Archaeological Reports International series 1348). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Turner, N.J., Ari, Y., Berkes, F., Davidson-Hunt, I., Fusun Ertug, Z. & Miller, A.. 2009. Cultural management of living trees: an international perspective. Journal of Ethnobiology 29(2): 237–70.Google Scholar
Zvelebil, M. & Moore, J.. 2006. Assessment and representation: the informative value of Mesolithic landscapes, in Rensink, E. & Peeters, H. (ed.) Preserving the early past: investigation, selection and preservation of Paleolithic and Mesolithic sites and landscapes (Nederlandse archeologische rapporten 31): 151-65. Amersfoort: Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek.Google Scholar