Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:54:36.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An ‘Imperial Philosophical Machine’: the archaeology of the Cambridge Observatory and early modern science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2011

Christopher Evans  and
Richard Newman
Christopher Evans
Affiliation:
Cambridge Archaeological Unit, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK (Email: cje30@cam.ac.uk; rn276@cam.ac.uk)
Richard Newman
Affiliation:
Cambridge Archaeological Unit, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK (Email: cje30@cam.ac.uk; rn276@cam.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Commercial excavators often find that their way back to the past runs through relatively recent structures. What should we do with them? Intellectually sensitive modern excavators, like our authors, are beginning to convince us that these recent constructions not only matter in themselves, but may have interesting links to what lies beneath. Here they introduce us to the foundations of an early telescope, a monument that takes its context both from the much-investigated lands of West Cambridge, and the more abstract landscape of early science. Forcing archaeology to ask fresh questions and make ambitious connections is only proper in a place heavy with the aroma of investigative scholarship.

Keywords

EnglandCambridgeIron Agenineteenth centurytelescopeNewallsciencemonument
Type
Research article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 85 , Issue 330 , December 2011 , pp. 1369 - 1384
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Airy, G.B. 1844. Account of the Northumberland equatoreal and dome, attached to the Cambridge Observatory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ANON. 1870. The Newall telescope. Nature 1: 408–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANON. 1906. Eminent living geologists: Thomas McKenny Hughes, M.A., F. R.S., F. G.S, F. S.A. The Geological Magazine 3: 1–13.Google Scholar
Argyle, R.W. 2007. Thomas Cooke (1807–1868): a great English telescope maker. The Observatory 127: 392–400.Google Scholar
Aubin, D. 2003. The fading star of the Paris Observatory in the nineteenth-century astronomers; urban culture of circulation and observation. Osiris 18: 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babington, C.C. 1864. On Roman interments by the side of the so-called Via Devana, near Cambridge. Communications of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society 2: 289–94.Google Scholar
Babington, C.C. 1883. Ancient Cambridgeshire. London: Deighton Bell & Co.Google Scholar
Boreham, S. 2002. The Pleistocene stratigraphy and palaeoenvironments of the Cambridge district. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The Open University.Google Scholar
Buchli, V. & Lucas, G.. 2001. Archaeologies of the contemporary past. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burkitt, M.C. 1920. ‘Notes on the implements’, in J. E. Marr, The Pleistocene deposits around Cambridge. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 75: 241–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkitt, M.C. 1925. Prehistory: a study of early cultures in Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. & Gardner, M.. 1962. The annotated snark. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Cattermole, M.J.G. & Wolfe, A.F.. 1987. Horace Darwin's shop: a history of the Cambridge scientific instrument company 1878 to 1978. Bristol: Adam Hilger.Google Scholar
Clark, J.G.D. 1938. Early man, in Salzman, L.F. (ed.) A history of the County of Cambridge and the Isle of Ely, Volume 1: 247–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darrin, A.G. & O'Leary, B.L. (ed.). 2009. Handbook of space engineering, archaeology and heritage. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewhirst, D.W. 1970. The Newall telescope. Journal of the British Astronomical Association 80: 493–5.Google Scholar
Eddington, A.S. 1929. Science and the unseen world. New York: MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
Edmonds, M. 2010. When they come to model Heaven: big science and the monumental in post-war Britain. Antiquity 84: 774–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. 2009a. 1859 - Marking Time (Special Section Introduction). Antiquity 83: 458–61.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 2009b. Small agencies and great consequences: Darwin's archaeology. Antiquity 83: 475–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. & Hodder, I.. 2006. Marshland communities and cultural landscape: The Haddenham Project, 2. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Evans, C. & Lucas, G.. Forthcoming. Hinterlands: the archaeology of West Cambridge. Cambridge (CAU Landscape Archives: New Archaeologies of the Cambridge Region 2). Cambridge: Cambridge Archaeological Unit; Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Evans, C. & Newman, R.. 2010. North West Cambridge, University of Cambridge: archaeological evaluation fieldwork. Cambridge Archaeological Unit Report No. 921.Google Scholar
Evans, C. & Pollard, J.. 1999. The institutional facade: architectural recording at the Old Schools, University of Cambridge. The Antiquaries Journal 79: 213–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. With Mackay, D. & Webley, L.. 2008. Borderlands - The archaeology of the Addenbrooke's environs, South Cambridge (CAU Landscape Archives: New Archaeologies of the Cambridge Region 1) Cambridge: Cambridge Archaeological Unit; Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Evans, C. With Beadsmoore, E., Brudenell, M. & Lucas, G.. 2009. Fengate revisited: further Fen-edge excavations, Bronze Age fieldsystems/settlement and the Wyman Abbott/Leeds Archives (CAU Landscape Archives: Historiography and Fieldwork 1) Cambridge: Cambridge Archaeological Unit; Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. 2004. Victorians and the prehistoric. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
González-Ruibal, A. 2008. Time to destroy: an archaeology of supermodernity. Current Anthropology 49: 247–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, R. 1976. The Cambridgeshire coprolite mining rush. Cambridge: Oleander Press.Google Scholar
Guillebaud, P. 2007. West Cambridge 1870–1914: building the bicycle suburb. Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society 96: 193–210.Google Scholar
Gurney, A. 2004. Compass: a story of exploration and innovation. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Hall, C.P. & Ravensdale, J.R.. 1976. The West Fields of Cambridge (Cambridge Antiquarian Records Society 3) Cambridge: Cambridge Antiquarian Records Society.Google Scholar
Headrick, D. 1981. The tools of empire: technology and European imperialism in the nineteenth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holiday, H. 1914. Reminiscences of my life. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, E.J. & O'reilly, M.M.. 1925. The Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Girton College, Cambridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. 2008. The age of wonder: how the romantic generation discovered the beauty and terror of science. London: Harper Press.Google Scholar
Keay, J. 2000. The great arc: the dramatic tale of how India was mapped and Everest was named. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Lightman, B. 2007. Victorian popularizers of science: designing nature for new audiences. London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, J.E. 1917. Submergence and glacial climates during the accumulation of the Cambridgeshire Pleistocene deposits. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 19: 64–71.Google Scholar
Marr, J.E. 1920. The Pleistocene deposits around Cambridge. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 75: 204–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, J.E. 1926. The Pleistocene deposits of the lower part of the Great Ouse basin. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 82: 101–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marr, J.E. & Burkitt, M.C.. 1923. A Neolithic site northwest of Cambridge. Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society 25: 11–15.Google Scholar
Masser, P. 2000. Archaeological investigations at the Hoyle Building site, Madingley Rise, Cambridge. Cambridge Archaeological Unit Report No. 391.Google Scholar
Matsopoulos, N., Yiotis, C. & Markea, M.. 1995. The travels of an impressive refractor: the 25 inch Newall. Journal of the Antique Telescope Society 8: 8–11.Google Scholar
Milne, E.A. 1944. Hugh Frank Newall: 1857–1944. Obituary notices of Fellows of the Royal Society 4: 717–32.Google Scholar
Newman, R. 2008. The Kavli Institute for Cosmology, Cambridge: an archaeological excavation. Cambridge Archaeological Unit Report No. 820.Google Scholar
O'connor, B. 1998. The dinosaurs on Coldham's Common: the story of Cambridge's coprolite industry. Sandy: self-published.Google Scholar
Pritchard, C. 1868. Obituary of Thomas Cooke (1807–1868). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 29: 130–35.Google Scholar
Reingold, N. & Rothenberg, M. (ed.). 1987. Scientific colonialism: a cross-cultural comparison. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, T. 2000. The Palaeolithic period of the Ouse Valley, in Dawson, M. (ed.) Prehistoric, Roman, and post-Roman landscapes of the Great Ouse Valley (CBA Research Report 119): 35–44. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Historical Monuments of England (RCHM[E]). 1959. An inventory of the historical monuments in the city of Cambridge. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Roe, D.A. 1968. A gazetteer of British Lower and Middle Palaeolithic sites (CBA Research Report 8). London: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Ruggles, C. & Cotte, M.. 2010. Heritage sites of astronomy and archaeoastronomy in the context of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention. Paris: ICOMOS & The International Astronomical Union.Google Scholar
Russell, M. 2000. Flint mines in Neolithic Britain. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Saville, A. 1981. Grimes Graves, Norfolk, excavations 1971-72, Volume 2: the flint assemblage. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Schaffer, S. 1980a. ‘The Great Laboratories of the Universe’: William Herschel on matter theory and planetary life. Journal for the History of Astronomy 11: 81–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, S. 1980b. Herschel in Bedlam: natural history and stellar astronomy. The British Journal for the History of Science 13: 211–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, S. Forthcoming a. The Bombay Case: astronomers, instrument makers and the Honourable East India Company. Journal for the History of Astronomy.Google Scholar
Schaffer, S. Forthcoming b. ‘When the Stars threw down their Spears’: histories of astronomy and empire. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. (ed.) 2009. Defining moments: dramatic archaeologies of the twentieth-century (British Archaeological Reports international series 2005). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Smith, P.J. 2009. A ‘Splendid Idiosyncrasy’: prehistory at Cambridge 1915–50 (British Archaeological Reports British series 485). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Soojung-Kim Pang, A. 1993. The social event of the season: solar eclipse expeditions and Victorian culture. Isis 84: 252–77.Google Scholar
Soojung-Kim Pang, A. 2002. Empire and the sun: Victorian solar eclipse expeditions. Palo Alto (CA): Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Spargo, P.E. 2005. Investigating the site of Newton's laboratory in Trinity College, Cambridge. South African Journal of Science 101: 315–21.Google Scholar
Stratton, F.J.M. 1949. The history of the Cambridge Observatories (Annals of the Solar Physics Observatory 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thiessen, A.D. 1940. The founding of the Toronto Magnetic Observatory and the Canadian Meteorological Service. Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada 40: 308–348.Google Scholar
Van Riper, A.B. 1993. Men among mammoths: Victorian science and the discovery of human prehistory. Chicago (IL): Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
White, T., White, M. & Boreham, S.. 2009. Notes on the Traveller's Rest Pit, Girton (TL 429 602). Unpublished research document of the Fenland Rivers of Cambridgeshire Palaeolithic Project (FRCPP).Google Scholar
Willis, R. & Clark, J.W.. 1886. The architectural history of the University of Cambridge and of the colleges of Cambridge and Eton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wymer, J. 1996. The English Rivers Palaeolithic Project: regions 9 (Great Ouse drainage) and 12 (Yorkshire and Lincolnshire Wolds). London: Wessex Archaeology.Google Scholar