Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:30:44.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeology in the 21st century: six modest recommendations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

William Andrew Mcdonald
William Andrew Mcdonald*
Affiliation:
Minnesota Messenia Expedition, University of Minnesota, 331 Folwell Hall, 9 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis MN 55455, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

My age-fellows and I, whose professional careers over the past 50 years or so have been devoted to college teaching in the USA and whose fieldwork was conducted mainly in Mediterranean countries, will scarcely see the opening of the next century. Perhaps the most useful contribution veterans like us can now make to the overall discipline – not just to our own ‘wing’ — is to outline certain problems that have particularly disturbed us during our active careers. Younger colleagues – the new decisionmakers – can then judge whether our criticisms are well founded and, if so, what can (or should) be done to alter present practices and attitudes If our concerns are reasonable and our recommendations for remedial action are constructive, we can at least hope that useful discussion will result – particularly in the disciplinary subdivision with which we have been most closely associated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 65 , Issue 249 , December 1991 , pp. 829 - 839
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Some years ago, Antiquity printed a set of ‘Retrospects‘. It is good, from time to time, to hear one of the seniors in our business tell where we have come from and where we may be going. Here is a prospect, based on knowledge from retrospect, of the view from one of the more adventurous among the older generation of North American classicists.

References

Aufderheide, A.C., Wittmers, L.E. & Alich, A. 1981. Lead in bone I: Direct analysis for lead in milligram quantities of bone ash by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy, American Journal of Classical Pathology 75: 80–85.Google Scholar
Aufderheide, A.C., Wittmers, L.E., Nieman, F.D. & Rapp, G. JR 1981. Lead in bone II: Skeletal lead content as an indicator of lifetime lead ingestion and the social correlates in an archaeological population, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 55: 285–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aufderheide, A.C., Wittmers, J.L., Angel, G., Rapp, JR & others. 1985. Lead in bone III: Prediction of social correlates from skeletal lead content in four colonial American populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 66: 353–61.Google Scholar
Aufderheide, A.C., Wittmers, L.E. & others. 1986. Lead content and poisoning in Barbados slaves: historical, chemical and biological evidence, Journal of the Social Science History Association 10: 399–425.Google Scholar
Aufderheide, A.C., Wittmers, L.E., Rapp, G. Jr & Alich, A. 1988. Lead in bone IV: Distribution of lead in the human skeleton, Archives of Environmental Health 43: 381–91.Google Scholar
Aufderheide, A.C., Wittmers, L.E., Rapp, G. Jr & Wallgren, J. 1988. Anthropological applications of skeletal lead analysis, American Anthropologist 90: 932–5.Google Scholar
Blegen, C.W. 1939. Excavations at Pylos, American Journal of Archaeology 43: 551–76.Google Scholar
Dyson, S. 1981. A classical archaeologist’s response to the ‘New archaeology’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 242: 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, B. (ed.). 1989. The archaeology of human origins: papers by Glynn Isaac. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kraft, J.C. 1977. Paleogeographic reconstructions of coastal Aegean archaeological sites, Science 195: 941–7.Google Scholar
Kraft, J.C. 1980. Late Pliocene paleogeographic reconstruction in the Bay of Navarino: Sandy Pylos, Journal of Archaeological Science 7: 187–210.Google Scholar
Kraft, J.C. & Aschenbrenner, S.E. 1977. Paleogeographic reconstructions in the Methoni embayment in Greece, Journal of Field Archaeology 4: 19–44.Google Scholar
Kraft, J.C., Rapp, G. Jr. & Aschenbrenner, S.E. 1975. Late Holocene paleogeography of the coastal plain of the Gulf of Messenia, Greece, and its relationship to archaeological settings and coastal change, Geological Society of America Bulletin 86: 1191–1208.Google Scholar
Kraft, J.C., Rapp, G. Jr., Aschenbrenner, S.E. & others. 1987. The Pass of Thermopylae, Greece, Journal of Field Archaeology 14: 181–98.Google Scholar
Mcdonald, W.A. & Rapp, G. Jr. (ed.). 1972. The Minnesota Messenia expedition: reconstructing a Bronze Age regional environment. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mcdonald, W.A. & Rapp, G. Jr. (ed.). 1974. Archaeology in the Graduate School, Journal of Field Archaeology 1: 371–3.Google Scholar
Mcdonald, W.A., Rapp, G. Jr. & Hope Simpson, R. 1961. Prehistoric habitation in southwestern Peloponnese, American Journal of Archaeology 65: 229–45.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1980. The Great Tradition versus the Great Divide: archaeology as anthropology, American Journal of Archaeology 84: 287–98.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A.M. 1985. The New archaeology and the classical archaeologist, American Journal of Archaeology 89: 31–7.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A.M. 1987. An archaeology of Greece. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar