Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T23:46:47.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond the surface: comments on Hodder's ‘reflexive excavation methodology’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Fekri A. Hassan
Fekri A. Hassan*
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Comment is offered on the ‘post-processual’ approach to excavation in the field advocated in the September Antiquity.

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 71 , Issue 274 , December 1997 , pp. 1020 - 1025
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachelard, G. 1984. The new scientific spirit. Boston (MA): Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1956. A short introduction to archaeology. London: Frederick Muller.Google Scholar
Colley, S. 1995. What happened at WAC-3? Antiquity 69:15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamptin, N. 1968. The Enlightenment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hassan, F. 1995. The world archaeological congress in India: politicizing the past. Antiquity 69: 874–7.Google Scholar
Heelan, P.A. 1984. Foreword, in Bachelard (1984): vii–xiii.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1996. On the surface: Çatalhoyiik 1993-95. Cambridge: The Catalhöyük Research Trust & Ankara: British Institut of Archaeology at Ankara. Çatalhoyük Project Volume 1/BIAA Monograph 22.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1997. ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: towards a reflexive excavation methodology, Antiquity 71: 691–700.Google Scholar
Kuzner, L.A. 1997. Reclaiming a scientific anthropology. Walnut Creek (CA): Altamira.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.F. 1979. The post-modern condition. (Translated Bennington, G. & Massumi, B.) Minneapolis (MN): Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
Macneish, R.S. 1978. The science of archaeology? North Scituate (MA): Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Mander, A.E. 1936. Clearer thinking (logic for everyone). London: Watts.Google Scholar
Mueller, J.W. (ed.). 1975. Sampling in archaeology. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. 1969. Objectivity in social research. New York (NY): Pantheon.Google Scholar
Neurath, O. 1944. Foundations of the social sciences 2(1). Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Randall, J.H. JR & Buchler, J. 1952 (first published 1942). Philosophy, an introduction. New York (NY): Barnes & Noble. College Outline Series.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1969. An outline of intellectual rubbish, in Unpopular essays: 65–111. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B.C. 1980. The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Watson, P.J., Leblanc, S.A. & Redman, CL. 1971. Explanation in archeology. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.Google Scholar