Hostname: page-component-686fd747b7-8z4zl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T12:11:21.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chalcolithic and modern potting at Gilund, Rajasthan: a cautionary tale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Amrita Sarkar
Amrita Sarkar*
Affiliation:
Deccan College Postgraduate & Research Institute (Deemed University), Pune 411006, India (Email: amritjoy@gmail.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By an interesting coincidence the village of Gilund in Rajasthan, north-west India was host to an important Chalcolithic settlement of the early third millennium BC and to some of the last indigenous potters still working in the twenty-first century AD. The author shows how her study of the prehistoric potters was enhanced by what she learnt from their modern successors, pointing out that she was only just in time. These potters will be the last to practice and in this respect ethnoarchaeology is itself under threat.

Keywords

IndiaRajasthanChalcolithicthird millennium BCceramicspotteryethnoarchaeology
Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 85 , Issue 329 , September 2011 , pp. 994 - 1007
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameri, M. E. 2010. Sealings at the edge of third millenium middle Asian interaction spheres: the view from Gilund, Rajasthan, India. Unpublished PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. J. III. 1991. Domestic ceramic production and spatial organization: a Mexican case study in ethnoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAR. 1959–1960. Indian archaeology: a review. New Delhi: Annual Publication of the Archaeological Survey of India.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. 1997. Pottery in Rajasthan: ethnoarchaeology in two Indian cities. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Matson, F. R. 1965. Ceramic ecology: an approach to the study of early cultures of the Near East, in Matson, F. R. (ed.) Ceramics and man (Viking Fund Publication in Anthropology 41): 202–217. Chicago (IL): Aldine.Google Scholar
Mishra, A. 2008. Beyond pots and pans: a study of Chalcolithic Balathal. New Delhi: IGRMS & Aryan Books International.Google Scholar
Misra, V. N. 2007. Rajasthan: prehistoric and early historic foundations. New Delhi: Aryan Books International.Google Scholar
Nagar, M. 1967. The Ahar culture: an archaeological and ethnographic study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Poona University.Google Scholar
Possehl, G. L., Shinde, V. & Ameri, M. 2004. The Ahar-Banas Complex and the BMAC. Man & Environment 29(2): 18–29.Google Scholar
Sankalia, H. D., Deo, S. B. & Ansari, Z. D. 1969. Excavation at Ahar (Tambavati). Pune: Deccan College.Google Scholar
Saraswati, B. & Behura, N. K. 1966. Pottery techniques in peasant India (Anthropological Survey of India Memoir 13). Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India.Google Scholar
Shinde, V. 2002. The emergence, development and spread of agricultural communities in South Asia, in Yasuda, Y. (ed.) The origins of pottery and agriculture: 89–115. New Delhi: Roli Books.Google Scholar
Shinde, V. & Possehl, G. L. 2005. A report on the excavations at Gilund in Jarrige, C. & Lefèvre, V. (ed.) South Asian archaeology, 2001: proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the European Association of South Asian Archaeologists held in College de France, Paris, 2-6 July 2001: 292–302. Paris: Recherche sur les Civilisations.Google Scholar