Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:06:31.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The chronology of culture: a comparative assessment of European Neolithic dating approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

Katie Manning ,
Adrian Timpson ,
Sue Colledge ,
Enrico Crema ,
Kevan Edinborough ,
Tim Kerig  and
Stephen Shennan
Katie Manning*
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK
Adrian Timpson
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK Research Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Sue Colledge
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK
Enrico Crema
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK
Kevan Edinborough
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK
Tim Kerig
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK
Stephen Shennan
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK
*
Author for correspondence (Email: k.manning@ucl.ac.uk)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Archaeologists have long sought appropriate ways to describe the duration and floruit of archaeological cultures in statistical terms. Thus far, chronological reasoning has been largely reliant on typological sequences. Using summed probability distributions, the authors here compare radiocarbon dates for a series of European Neolithic cultures with their generally accepted ‘standard’ date ranges and with the greater precision afforded by dendrochronology, where that is available. The resulting analysis gives a new and more accurate description of the duration and intensity of European Neolithic cultures.

Keywords

Neolithicculturechronologiesdendrochronologyradiocarbon datingBayesian analysis
Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 88 , Issue 342 , December 2014 , pp. 1065 - 1080
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ;.
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd.

References

Aitchison, T., Ottaway, B. & Al-Ruzaiza, A.S.. 1991. Summarizing a group of 14C dates on the historical time scale: with a worked example from the Late Neolithic of Bavaria. Antiquity 65: 108–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, A.L. & Whittle, A.W.R. (ed.). 2007. Histories of the dead: building chronologies for five southern British long barrows (Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17, Supplement 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Billamboz, A. & Köninger, J.. 2008. Dendroarchäologische Untersuchungen zur Besiedlungs- und Landschaftsentwicklung im Neolithikum des westlichen Bodenseegebietes, in Dörfler, W., Müller, J. & Wesse, A. (ed.) Umwelt—Wirtschaft—Siedlungen im dritten vorchristlichen Jahrtausend Mitteleuropas und S üdskandinaviens: 317–34. Neumünster: Wachholtz.Google Scholar
Blockley, S.P.E., Donahue, R.E. & Pollard, A.M.. 2000. Radiocarbon calibration and Late Glacial occupation in north-west Europe. Antiquity 74: 112–21.Google Scholar
Breunig, P. 1987. 14 C-Chronologie des Vorderasiatischen, Suedost- und Mitteleuropaeischen Neolithikums. Köln: Boehlau.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51: 337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D.L. 1968. Analytical archaeology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Crema, E. 2013. Cycles of change in Jomon settlement: a case study from eastern Tokyo Bay. Antiquity 87: 1169–81.Google Scholar
Czebreszuk, J. & Müller, J. (ed.). 2001. Die absolute Chronologie in Mitteleuropa 3000–2000 v. Chr. (Studien zur Archäologie in Ostmitteleuropa 1). Rahden: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Denaire, A. 2011. Chronologie absolue de la séquence Hinkelstein-Grossgartach-Roessen-Bischheim dans le sud de la plaine du Rhin supérieur et le nord de la Franche-Comté à la lumiàre des derniàres données, in Denaire, A., Jeunesse, C. & Lefranc, P. (ed.) N écropole et enceintes danubiennes du Ve millénaire dans le Nord-Est de la France et le Sud-Ouest de l’Allemagne: 9–30. Strasbourg: Maison Interuniversitaire des Sciences de l’Homme-Alsace, Université de Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Dendro, . n.d. Dendro- und C14-Daten der Schweiz. Available at http://www.erz.be.ch/erz/de/index/kultur/archaeologie/daten/dendro-undc14-daten.html (accessed 29 July 2014).Google Scholar
Fowler, H.N. (trans.). 1925. Plato in twelve volumes. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Furholt, M. 2003. Die absolutchronologische Datierung der Schnurkeramik in Mitteleuropa und S üdskandinavien (Universitätsforschungen zur Prähistorischen Archäologie 101). Bonn: R. Habelt.Google Scholar
Furholt, M. 2014. Upending a ‘totality’: re-evaluating Corded Ware variability in Late Neolithic Europe. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ppr.2013.20 Google Scholar
Geschwinde, M. & Raetzel-Fabian, D.. 2009. EWBSL: Eine Fallstudie zu den jungneolithischen Erdwerken am Nordrand der Mittelgebirge (Beiträge zur Archäologie in Niedersachsen 14). Rahden: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Heaton, T.J., Blackwell, P.G. & Buck, C.E.. 2009. A Bayesian approach to the estimation of radiocarbon calibration curves: the IntCal09 methodology. Radiocarbon 51: 1151–64.Google Scholar
Lee, S. & Bronk Ramsey, C.. 2012. Development and application of the trapezoidal model for archaeological chronologies. Radiocarbon 54: 107–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/azujsrc.v54i1.12397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J. 2009. Dating the Neolithic: methodological premises and absolute chronology. Radiocarbon 51: 721–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J. & Van Willigen, J.. 2001. New radiocarbon evidence for European Bell Beakers and the consequences for the diffusion of the Bell Beaker phenomenon, in Nicolis, F. (ed.) Bell Beakers today: 59–80. Trento: All’Insegna del Giglio.Google Scholar
Müller, J., Becker, C., Bruchhaus, H., Kaiser, E., Neubert, A., Pichler, S. & Zabel, M.. 2000. Radiokarbonchronologie—Keramiktechnologie-Osteologie-Anthropologie-Raumanalysen. Beiträge zum Neolithikum und zur Frühbronzezeit im Mittel-Elbe- Saale-Gebiet. Bericht der R ömisch-Germanischen Kommission 80: 25–211.Google Scholar
Ottaway, B. 1973. Dispersion diagrams: a new approach to the display of carbon-14 dates. Archaeometry 15: 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1973.tb00073.x Google Scholar
Raetzel-Fabian, D. 2000. Calden. Erdwerk und Bestattungsplätze des Jungneolithikums. Architektur—Ritual—Chronologie. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Raetzel-Fabian, D. 2002. Absolute chronology and cultural development of the Wartberg culture in Germany. Available at: http://www.jungsteinsite.uni-kiel.de/pdf/20022fabian.pdf (accessed 29 July 2014).Google Scholar
Reingruber, A. & Thissen, L.. 2009. Depending on 14C data: chronological frameworks in the Neolithic and Chalcolithic of southeastern Europe. Radiocarbon 51: 751–70.Google Scholar
Shennan, S.J. 1978. Archaeological ‘cultures’: an empirical investigation, in Hodder, I. (ed.) The spatial organisation of culture: 113–39. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Shennan, S.J. 1989. Introduction: archaeological approaches to cultural identity, in Shennan, S.J. (ed.) Archaeological approaches to cultural identity: 1–32. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Shennan, S., Downey, S.S., Timpson, A., Edinborough, K., Colledge, S., Kerig, T., Manning, K. & Thomas, M.G.. 2013. Regional population collapse followed initial agriculture booms in mid-Holocene Europe. Nature Communications 4: 2486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3486 Google Scholar
Shennan, S.J., Crema, E. & Kerig, T.. 2014. Isolation-by-distance, homophily, and ‘core’ vs. ‘package’ cultural evolution models in Neolithic Europe. Evolution and Human Behaviour. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.09.006 Google Scholar
Stadler, P., Draxler, S., Friesinger, H., Kutschera, W., Steier, P. & Wild, E.M.. 2001. Absolute chronology for early civilisations in Austria and Central Europe using 14C dating with accelerator mass spectrometry with special results for the absolute chronology of Baden culture, in Studia Danubiana Series Symposia II: Cernavodâ III-Boleráz: 541–62. Bucharest: Institutul Romăn de Tracologie.Google Scholar
Ullrich, M. 2008. Endneolithische Siedlungskeramik aus Ergersheim, Mittelfranken: Untersuchungen zur Chronologie von Schnurkeramik- und Glockenbechern am Rhein, Main und Neckar. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Van De Velde, P. 2012. Chronology of the Dutch Neolithic Bandkeramik culture: a new attempt, in Bakels, C. & Kamermans, H. (ed.) The end of our fifth decade (Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 43/44): 293–305. Leiden: Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Whittle, A.W.R., Healy, F.M. & Bayliss, A.. 2011. Gathering time: dating the Early Neolithic enclosures of southern Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Włodarczak, P. 2009. Radiocarbon and dendrochronological dates of the Corded Ware culture. Radiocarbon 51: 737–49.Google Scholar