Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:15:17.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Middle Horizon cord-keeping to the rise of Inka khipus in the central Andes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Gary Urton
Gary Urton*
Affiliation:
*Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, 1350 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA (Email: gurton@fas.harvard.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recording devices formed of knotted cords, known as khipus, are a well-known feature of imperial administration among the Inka of Andean South America. The origins and antecedents of this recording system are, however, much less clearly documented. Important insights into that ancestry are offered by a group of eight khipus dating from the later part of the Middle Horizon period (AD 600–1000), probably used by the pre-Inka Wari culture of the central Andes. This article reports the AMS dating of four of these early khipus. A feature of the Middle Horizon khipus is the clustering of knots in groups of five, suggesting that they were produced by a people with a base five number system. Later, Inka khipus were organised instead around a decimal place-value system. Hence the Inka appear to have encountered the base five khipus among Wari descendant communities late in the Middle Horizon or early in the Late Intermediate period (AD 1000–1450), subsequently adapting them to a decimal system.

Keywords

South Americacentral AndesTiwanakuInkaWariMiddle Horizon periodAD 600–1000khipus
Type
Research articles
Information
Antiquity , Volume 88 , Issue 339 , March 2014 , pp. 205 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brokaw, G. 2010. A history of the khipu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, L. T. 1993. Hidioma Aymara. LaPaz: ILCA.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51:337–60.Google Scholar
Cerron-Palomino, R. 2004. El Aimara como lengua official de los Incas: identidad y transformación en el Tawantinsuyu y en los Andes coloniales, in Kaulicke, P., G. Urton, & Farrington, I. (ed.) Perspectivas arqueológicas y etnohistoricas (Boletín de Arqueología PUCP 8): 9–21. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru.Google Scholar
Cerron-Palomino, R. 2008. Voces del Ande: ensayos sobre onomástica andina. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru.Google Scholar
Cherkinsky, A. & Urton, G.. In press. Radiocarbon chronology of Andean khipus. Radiocarbon.Google Scholar
Conklin, W. J. 1982. The information system of the Middle Horizon quipus, in Aveni, A. & Urton, G. (ed.) Ethnoastronomy and archaeoastronomy in the American tropics (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 385): 261–81. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Conklin, W. J. 2002. A khipu information string theory, in Quilter, J. & Urton, G. (ed.) Narrative threads: accounting and recounting in Andean khipu: 53–86. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Covey, R. A. 2006. How the Incas built their heartland: state formation and the innovation ofimperial strategies in the Sacred Valley, Peru. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusihuaman, A. 1976. Gramatica Quechua Cuzco-Collao. Lima: Ministerio de Educacion & Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Heggarty, P. 2008. Linguistics for archaeologists: a case-study in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18:35–56 (supplementary material available at: http://www.arch.cam.ac.uk/~pah1003/loe/Eng/SupplInfo/2008Heggarty.htm (accessed 9 July 2013).Google Scholar
Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D.. 2012. Archaeology and language in the Andes: a cross-disciplinary exploration of prehistory (Proceedings of the British Academy 173). London: British Academy & Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Isbell, W. H. 2008. Wari and Tiwanaku: international identities in the central Andean Middle Horizon, in Silverman, H. & Isbell, W. H. (ed.) Handbook of South American archaeology: 731–60. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Platt, T. 2002. ‘Without deceit or lies’: variable Chinu readings during a sixteenth-century tributerestitution trial, in Quilter, J. & Urton, G. (ed.) Narrative threads: accounting and recountingin Andean khipu: 225–65. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Radicati Di Primeglio, C. 2006. Estudios sobre los quipus. Translated and edited by G. Urton. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.Google Scholar
Reimer, P. J., Baillie, M.G.L., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J. W., Blackwell, P.G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Buck, C. E., Burr, G. S., Edwards, R. L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P. M., Guilderson, T.P., Hajdas, I., Heaton, T. J., Hogg, A. G., Hughen, K. A., Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., Mccormac, F.G., Wmanning, S., Reimer, R. W., Richards, D. A., Southon, J.R., Talamo, S., S.M.Turney, C., Van Der Plicht, J. & Weyhenmeyer, C.E.. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0-50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51:1111–50.Google Scholar
Salomon, F. 2004. The cord keepers: khipus and cultural life in a Peruvian village. Durham (NC) & London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Schreiber, K. J. 1992. Wari imperialism in Middle Horizon Peru (Anthropological Papers of the Museum of Anthropology 87). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Shady Solis, R., Narvaez, J. & Lopez, S.. 2000. La antiguedad del uso del quipu como escritura: las evidencias de la Huaca San Marcos. Boletín del Museo de Arqueología y Antropología, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos 3(10): 2–23.Google Scholar
Torero, A. 2002. Idiomas de los Andes: linguistica e historia. Lima: Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos.Google Scholar
Urton, G. 1999. Inca myths. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Urton, G. 2003. Signs of the Inka khipu: binarycodingin the Andean knotted-string records. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Urton, G. 2012. The herder-cultivator relationship as a paradigm for archaeological origins, linguistic dispersals and the evolution of record-keeping in the Andes, in Heggarty, P. & Beresford-Jones, D. (ed.) Archaeologyandlanguage in the Andes: a cross-disciplinaryexploration of prehistory (Proceedings of the British Academy 173): 321–43. London: British Academy & Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Urton, G. 2013. Wari and Cajamarquilla administrative cord-keeping on the central coast of Peru. Paper presented at the Society for American Archaeology 78th Annual Meeting, Honolulu, 3-7 April 2013.Google Scholar
Urton, G. & Brezine, C. J.. 2011. Khipu typologies, in Boone, E. H. & Urton, G. (ed.) Their way of writing: scripts, signs and pictographies in pre-Columbian America: 319–52. Washington, D. C.: Dumbarton oaks Research Library.Google Scholar