Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:25:53.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immigration and transhumance in the Early Bronze Age Carpathian Basin: the occupants of a kurgan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Claudia Gerling ,
Eszter Bánffy ,
János Dani ,
Kitti Köhler ,
Gabriella Kulcsár ,
Alistair W.G. Pike ,
Vajk Szeverényi  and
Volker Heyd
Claudia Gerling
Affiliation:
Institut für Prähistorische Archäologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Altensteinstr. 15, Berlin 14195, Germany Department of Archaeology & Anthropology, University of Bristol, 43 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UU, UK
Eszter Bánffy
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Research Centre for the Humanities, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Uri u. 49, Budapest 1014, Hungary
János Dani
Affiliation:
Déri Múzeum Debrecen, Déri tér 1, Debrecen 4026, Hungary
Kitti Köhler
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Research Centre for the Humanities, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Uri u. 49, Budapest 1014, Hungary
Gabriella Kulcsár
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Research Centre for the Humanities, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Uri u. 49, Budapest 1014, Hungary
Alistair W.G. Pike
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology & Anthropology, University of Bristol, 43 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UU, UK
Vajk Szeverényi
Affiliation:
Móra Ferenc Múzeum, 1–3 Roosevelt tér, Szeged, Hungary
Volker Heyd*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology & Anthropology, University of Bristol, 43 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UU, UK
*
*Author for correspondence (Email: volker.heyd@bristol.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

You never know until you look. The authors deconstruct a kurgan burial mound in the Great Hungarian Plain designated to the Yamnaya culture, to find it was actually shared by a number of different peoples. The Yamnaya were an influential immigrant group of the Late Copper Age/Early Bronze Age transition. The burials, already characterised by their grave goods, were radiocarbon dated and further examined using stable isotope analysis on the human teeth. The revealing sequence began with a young person of likely local origin buried around or even before the late fourth millennium BC—a few centuries before the arrival of the Yamnaya. It ended around 500 years later with a group of different immigrants, apparently from the eastern mountains. These are explained as contacts built up between the mountains and the plain through the practice of transhumance.

Keywords

HungaryHungarian PlainCarpathiansEarly Bronze AgekurgansYamnayastable isotopestranshumance
Type
Research article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 86 , Issue 334 , December 2012 , pp. 1097 - 1111
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, D.W. 2007. The horse, the wheel, and language. How Bronze Age riders from the Eurasian steppes shaped the modern world. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, E.R. & Greenfield, H.J.. 2006. The origins of transhumant pastoralism in temperate southeastern Europe (British Archaeological Reports international series 1538). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Balasse, M., Ambrose, S., Smith, A. & Price, T.D.. 2002. The seasonal mobility model for prehistoric herders in the south-western cape of South Africa assessed by isotopic analysis of sheep tooth enamel. Journal of Archaeological Science 29: 917-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, R.A. 2006. Strontium isotopes from the earth to the archaeological skeleton: a review. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 13: 135-87.Google Scholar
Bentley, R.A., Krause, R., Price, T.D. & Kaufmann, B.. 2003. Human mobility at the early Neolithic settlement of Vaihingen, Germany: evidence from strontium isotope analysis. Archaeometry 45: 471-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciugudean, H. 1997. Începutul epocii bronzului în vestul transilvaniei: Aşezarea şi cimitirul tumular de la Livezile ‘Baia’, in Ciugudean, H. (ed.) Cercetӑri privind epoca bronzului şi prima vârstӑ a fierului în Transilvania: 7–44. Alba Iulia: Muzeul National al Unirii Alba Iulia.Google Scholar
Ciugudean, H. 2011. Mounds and mountains: burial rituals in Early Bronze Age Transylvania, in Berecki, S., Németh, R.E. & Rezi, B. (ed.) Bronze Age rites and rituals in the Carpathian Basin: 21–57. Târgu Mureş: MEGA.Google Scholar
Dani, J. 2011. Research of pit-grave cultures kurgans in Hungary in the last three decades, in Barczi, A. & Pető, Á. (ed.) Kurgan studies: an environmental and archaeological multiproxy study of burial mounds of the Eurasian steppe zone (British Archaeological Reports international series 2238): 25–69. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Dani, J. & Nepper, I.M.. 2006. Sárrétudvari-Őrhalom tumulus grave from the beginning of the EBA in eastern Hungary. Communicationes Archaeologicae Hungariae 2006: 29–63.Google Scholar
Dani, J. & Kisjuhász, V.. In press. Bestattungen der Makó-Kultur in Berettyóújfalu, Nagy Bócs-dűlő, in Anders, A., Kulcsár, G., Kiss, V., Kalla, G. & Szabó, G.V. (ed.) Prehistoric studies. Festschrift for Pál Raczky. Budapest: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
De Jong, H.N., Foster, G.L., Heyd, V. & Pike, A.W.G.. 2010. Further Sr isotopic studies on the Eulau multiple graves using laser ablation ICP-MS, in Meller, H. & Alt, K.W. (ed.) Anthropologie, Isotopie und DNA (Tagungen des Landesmuseums für Vorgeschichte Halle 3): 125-31. Halle: Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt.Google Scholar
Dergač;ev, V. 1998. Kulturelle und historische Entwicklungen im Raum zwischen Karpaten und Dnepr. Zu den Beziehungen zwischen frühen Gesellschaften im nördlichen Südost- und Osteuropa, in Hänsel, B. & Machnik, J. (ed.) Das Karpatenbecken und die osteuropäische Steppe (Südosteuropa-Schriften 20 & Prähist. Arch. in Südosteuropa 12): 27–64. Rahden/Westf.: Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Ecsedy, I. 1979. The people of the pit-grave kurgans in eastern Hungary. Budapest: Fontes Archaeologici Hungariae.Google Scholar
Faure, G. 1986. Principles of isotope geology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Giblin, J.I. 2009. Strontium isotope analysis of Neolithic and Copper Age populations on the Great Hungarian Plain. Journal of Archaeological Science 36: 491-97.Google Scholar
Harrison, R.J. & Heyd, V.. 2007. The transformation of Europe in the third millennium BC: the example of ‘Le Petit Chasseur I + III’ (Sion, Valais, Switzerland). Prähistorische Zeitschrift 82/2: 129–214.Google Scholar
Helms, M. 1988. Ulysses' sail: an ethnographic odyssey of power, knowledge and geographical distance. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Heyd, V. 2011. Yamnaya groups and tumuli west of the Black Sea, in Borgna, E. & Celka, S. Müller (ed.) Ancestral landscapes: burial mounds in the Copper and Bronze Ages (Travaux de la Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée 58): 535-55. Lyon: Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée.Google Scholar
Heyd, V. In press. Das Zeitalter der Ideologien: Interaktion, Expansion & Wettbewerb im prähistorischen Europa des 4. und 3. Jahrtausend v. Chr, in Hettrich, H. & Ziegler, S. (ed.) Die Ausbreitung des Indogermanischen: Thesen aus Sprachwissenschaft und Archäologie. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Horváth, T. 2011. Hajdúnánás-Tedej-Lyukas halom: an interdisciplinary survey of a typical kurgan from the Great Hungarian Plain region: a case study, in Barczi, A. & Pető, Á. (ed.) Kurgan studies: an environmental and archaeological multiproxy study of burial mounds of the Eurasian steppe zone (British Archaeological Reports international series 2238): 71–131. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Knipper, C. 2009. Mobility in a sedentary society: insights from isotope analysis of LBK human and animal teeth, in Hofmann, D. & Bickle, P. (ed.) Creating communities. New advances in Central European Neolithic research: 142-58. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Kulcsár, G. 2009. The beginnings of the Bronze Age in the Carpathian Basin: the Makó-Kosihy-Čaka and the Somogyvár-Vinkovci cultures in Hungary (Varia Archaeologica Hungarica 23). Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Longinelli, A. 1984. Oxygen isotopes in mammal bone phosphate: a new tool for palaeohydrological and palaeoclimatological research? Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 48: 385-90.Google Scholar
Mackay, A., Battarbee, R., Birks, J. & Oldfield, F. (ed.). 2005. Global change in the Holocene. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Merpert, N.Ya. 1974. Drevneishie Skotovody Volzhsko Uralskogo Mezhdurechya [The first pastoralists in the area between the rivers Volga and Ural]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Palmer, M.R. & Edmond, J.M.. 1989. The strontium isotope budget of the modern ocean. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 92: 11–26.Google Scholar
Porčić, M. 2008. Nomadic pastoralism in the Early Bronze Age of the Central Balkans. Evaluation of background knowledge. Balcanica 39: 7–31.Google Scholar
Price, T.D., Burton, J. & Bentley, R.. 2002. The characterization of biologically available strontium isotope ratios for the study of prehistoric migration. Archaeometry 44: 117-35.Google Scholar
Rassamakin, Y.Y. 1999. Chapter 3. The Eneolithic of the Black Sea steppe: dynamics of cultural and economic development 4500-2300 BC, in Levine, M.A., Rassamakin, Y., Kislenko, A. & Tatarintseva, N. (ed.) Late prehistoric exploitation of the Eurasian steppe: 59–183. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Rassamakin, Y.Y. & Nikolova, A.V.. 2008. Carpathian imports and imitations in context of the Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age of the Black Sea steppe area, in Biehl, P. & Rassamakin, Y.Y. (ed.) Import and imitation in archaeology (Schriften des Zentrums für Archäologie und Kulturgeschichte des Schwarzmeerraumes 11): 51–87. Langenweißbach: Beier & Beran.Google Scholar
Sava, V. 2008. Situri ale finalului epocii cuprului din Câmpia de Vest. Analele Banatului SN 16: 45–80.Google Scholar
Seghedi, I., Downes, H., Szakacs, A., Mason, P., Thirlwall, M., Rosu, E., Zoltan, P., Marton, E. & Panaiotu, C.. 2004. Neogene-quaternary magmatism and geodynamics in the Carpathian-Pannonian region: a synthesis. Lithos 72: 117-46.Google Scholar
Shishlina, N.I. 2008. Reconstruction of the Bronze Age of the Caspian steppes: life styles and life ways of pastoral nomads (British Archaeological Reports international series 1876). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Shishlina, N.I., Zazovskaya, E.P., Plicht, J. Van Der, Hedges, R.E.M., Sevastyanov, V.S. & Chichagova, O.A.. 2009. Paleoecology, subsistence, and 14C chronology of the Eurasian Caspian steppe Bronze Age. Radiocarbon 51/2: 481-99.Google Scholar
Spindler, K. 2003. Transhumanz. Preistoria Alpina 39: 219-125.Google Scholar
Trunkó, L. 1969. Geologie von Ungarn (Beiträge zur regionalen Geologie der Erde 8). Berlin & Stuttgart: Borntraeger.Google Scholar
Újvári, G., Ramos, F.C., Dimond, C., Kovács, J., Varga, G. & Varga, A.. 2010. On possible sources of loess deposits in the Carpathian Basin: an isotopic approach. Geophysical Research Abstracts 12: EGU2010-3881-1. Available at: http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2010/EGU2010-3881-1.pdf (accessed 22 March 2012).Google Scholar
White, S. 2008. An assessment of oxygen, carbon and strontium isotopes as a proxy for reconstructing herding practices in the Alpine Final Neolithic. Unpublished BSc dissertation, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, T. 2003. Zwischen Karpaten und Kaukasus-Anmerkungen zu einer ungewöhnlichen Kupferklinge aus Wien-Essling. Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 33: 469-77.Google Scholar