Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:01:45.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The invention of ‘Tarentine’ red-figure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jed M. Thorn
Jed M. Thorn*
Affiliation:
*Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 210226, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0226, USA (Email: jedthorn@gmail.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This deconstruction of how Apulian red-figure pottery came to be termed Tarentine has implications for archaeological methodology far beyond the Mediterranean. The author shows how the assumptions of great authorities, themselves rooted in a colonial world, led to a highly resistant model of core and periphery for pottery production that may have no basis in fact. It is a fine example of the process that has left us with so many unsuitable and immovable names for material from Samian to Gothic.

Keywords

MediterraneanItalyApuliaTarantoAtticred-figure
Type
Method
Information
Antiquity , Volume 83 , Issue 319 , March 2009 , pp. 174 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreassi, G. 1996. Jatta di Ruvo: la famiglia, la collezione, il museo nazionale. Bari: Adda.Google Scholar
Carpenter, T. 2003. The native market for red-figure vases in Apulia. Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 48: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cracolici, V. 2003. I sostegni di fornace dal kerameikos di Metaponto. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Cultrera, G. 1913. Di un vaso con scena del mito di Pelope e della ceramica italiota dipinta. Ausonia 7: 116–70.Google Scholar
Cuomo Di Caprio, N. 1992. Les ateliers de potiers en Grande Grèce: quelques aspects techniques. Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique Suppl. 23: 69–85.Google Scholar
D'Andria, F. 1975. Metaponto: scavi nella zona del Kerameikos (1973). Notizie degli Scavi di Antichita Suppl. 29: 355–452.Google Scholar
De Angelis, F. 1998. Ancient past, imperial present: the British Empire in T. J. Dunbabin's The western Greeks. Antiquity 72: 539–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degrassi, N. 1965. Il pittore di Policoro e l'officina di ceramica protoitaliota di Eraclea lucana. Bollettino d'arte 50: 5–37.Google Scholar
Dell'Aglio, A. 1996. Taranto, in Lippolis, E. (ed.) Arte e artigianato in Magna Grecia: 51–67. Naples: Electa.Google Scholar
Descoeudres, J.-P. 1990. Introduction, in Descoeudres, J.-P. (ed.) Greek colonists and native populations: 1–12. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ducati, P. 1907. Osservazioni sull'inizio della ceramica apula figurate. Jahreshefte des Ö sterreichischen Archäologischen Instituts in Wien 10: 251–63.Google Scholar
FurtwäNgler, A. 1893. Meisterwerke der griechischen Plastik. Leipzig: von Giesecke & Devrient.Google Scholar
Green, J. 1994. Theatre in ancient Greek society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Green, J. 1995. Theatrical motifs in non-theatrical contexts on vases of the later fifth and fourth centuries, in Griffiths, A. (ed.) Stage directions: 93–121. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google ScholarPubMed
Jatta, G. (I) 1844. Cenno storico sull'antichissima citta di Ruvo nella Peucezia. Naples: Tipografia di Porcelli. Reprinted 1972 in Ruvo di Puglia: Associazione Turistica pro Loco.Google Scholar
Jatta, G. (II) 1869. Catalogo del Museo Jatta. Naples. Reprinted in 1996 in Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Jircik, N. 1990. The Pisticci and Amykos painters. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas (Austin).Google Scholar
Lenormant, F. 1881. La Grande-Grèce, paysages et histoire, volume 1: littoral de la Mer Ionienne. Paris: L.A.évy.Google Scholar
Macchioro, V. 1912. Per la storia della ceramografia italiota. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung 27: 21-36, 163-88.Google Scholar
Mannino, K. 1996. Gli ateliers attici e la nascita della produzione figurata, in Lippolis, E. (ed.) Arte e artigianato in Magna Grecia: 363–70. Naples: Electa.Google Scholar
Mcphee, I. 1998. Arthur Dale Trendall, 1909-1995. Proceedings of the British Academy 97: 501–17.Google Scholar
Moon, N. 1929. Some early South Italian vase-painters. Papers of the British School at Rome 11: 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patroni, G. 1897. La ceramica antica nell'Italia meridionale. Naples: Accademia di Archeologia, Lettere e Belle Arti.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. 1990. Workshops of Apulian red-figure outside of Taranto, in Descoeudres, J.-P. (ed.) Eumousia: ceramic and iconographic studies in honour of Alexander Cambitoglou (Meditarch Suppl. 1) 179-93. Sydney: Mediterranean Archaeology.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. 2004. Reception of comic theatre amongst the indigenous South Italians. Mediterranean Archaeology 17: 193–212.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M. 1987. Centre and periphery: a review of a concept, in Rowlands, M., Larsen, M. & Kristiansen, K. (ed.) Centre and periphery in the ancient world: 1–11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silvestrelli, F. 2005. Le fasi iniziali della ceramica a figure rosse nel kerameikos di Metaponto, in Denoyelle, M. (ed.) La céramique apulienne: 113–23. Naples: Centre Jean Bérard.Google Scholar
Tillyard, E. 1923. The Hope vases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trendall, A. 1967. The red-figured vases of Lucania, Campania and Sicily. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Trendall, A. 1989. Red figure vases of South Italy and Sicily: a handbook. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Trendall, A. 1990. On the divergence of South Italian from Attic red-figure vase-painting, in Descoeudres, J.-P. (ed.) Greek colonists and native populations: 217–30. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Trendall, A. & Cambitoglou, A.. 1978. The red-figured vases of Apulia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar