Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:00:28.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relational bodies: affordances, substances and embodiment in Chinchorro funerary practices c. 7000–3250 BP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2021

Indira Montt ,
Dánae Fiore ,
Calogero M. Santoro  and
Bernardo Arriaza
Indira Montt*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Alta Investigación, Universidad de Tarapacá, Chile
Dánae Fiore
Affiliation:
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Técnicas, Asociación de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Calogero M. Santoro
Affiliation:
Instituto de Alta Investigación, Universidad de Tarapacá, Chile
Bernardo Arriaza
Affiliation:
Instituto de Alta Investigación, Universidad de Tarapacá, Chile
*
*Author for correspondence ✉ indiramontt@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Funerary art has the body as its main material component, expresses responses to death and offers insight into relationships between the living and the dead. Chinchorro hunter-gatherer-fisher societies along the Atacama Desert coast provide a key example of such connections, having developed one of the world's oldest-known systems of post-mortem body transformation (c. 7000–3250 BP). A study of 162 modified Chinchorro bodies identifies diachronic changes in these practices, including a decrease in internal stuffing—adding invisible contents that created corporeal volume—and an increase in external body treatment that created visible features. The authors propose that such manipulation was a meaningful form of social embodiment designed to construct a collective identity.

Keywords

Atacama Desert coastChileChinchorrohunter-gatherer-fishersembodimentfunerary artmortuary ritual
Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 95 , Issue 384 , December 2021 , pp. 1405 - 1425
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, M.J. et al. 1984. Chinchorro, momias de preparación complicada: métodos de momificación. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 13: 155–74.Google Scholar
Anschuetz, K., Wilshusen, R. & Scheick, C.. 2001. An archaeology of landscapes: perspectives and directions. Journal of Archaeological Research 9: 157–211. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016621326415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriaza, B.T. 1994. Tipología de las momias Chinchorro y evolución de las prácticas de momificación. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 26: 11–24.Google Scholar
Arriaza, B.T. 1995a. Beyond death: the Chinchorro mummies of ancient Chile. Washington, D.C.: Smithsoninan Institution. https://doi.org/10.2307/971599Google Scholar
Arriaza, B.T. 1995b. Chinchorro bioarchaeology: chronology and mummy seriation. Latin American Antiquity 6: 35–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/971599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriaza, B.T. 2005. Arseniasis as an environmental hypothetical explanation for the origin of the oldest artificial mummification practice in the world. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 37: 255–60.Google Scholar
Arriaza, B. & Standen, V.. 2009. Catálogo momias Chinchorro: cuerpos con momificación artificial. Arica: Universidad de Tarapacá.Google Scholar
Arriaza, B. & Standen, V.. 2016. Catálogo momias Chinchorro. Arica: Universidad de Tarapacá.Google Scholar
Arriaza, B.T., Hapke, R. & Standen, V.. 1998a. Making the dead beautiful: mummies as art. Archaeology. Available at: http://www.archaeology.org/online/features/chinchorro/ (accessed 9 October 2020).Google Scholar
Arriaza, B.T., Cárdenas, F., Kleiss, E. & Verano, J.. 1998b. South American mummies: culture and disease, in Cockburn, A., Cockburn, E. & Reyman, T. (ed.) Mummies, disease & ancient cultures: 190–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878340.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriaza, B.T., Doubrava, M., Standen, V. & Haas, H.. 2005. Differential mortuary treatment among the Andean Chinchorro fishers: social inequalities or in situ regional cultural evolution? Current Anthropology 46: 662–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/432747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriaza, B.T. et al. 2008. Caracterización química de las arcillas utilizadas para la momificación artificial en la Cultura Chinchorro, extremo Norte de Chile, in Atoche Peña, P., Rodríguez Martin, C. & Ramírez Rodríguez, M.A. (ed.) Mummies and science. World mummies research: 7th World Congress on Mummy Studies: 515–20. Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Centro de Artes Gráficas.Google Scholar
Arriaza, B.T. et al. 2012. Caracterización química y mineralógica de los materiales grises de los cuerpos Chinchorro modelados. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 44: 177–94. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-73562012000100013Google Scholar
Aufderheide, A.C., Muñoz, I. & Arriaza, B.T.. 1993. Seven Chinchorro mummies and the prehistory of northern Chile. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 91: 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330910205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belmonte, E. et al. 2001. Determinación taxonómica de fragmentos de madera de contexto funerario de la Cultura Chinchorro. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 33: 145–54. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-73562001000100024Google Scholar
Budja, M. 2010. The archaeology of death: from ‘social personae’ to ‘relational personhood’. Documenta Prehistorica 37: 68–106. https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.37.4Google Scholar
Cases, B. & Rojas, A.M.. 2001. Un planteamiento experimental de replicación: registro y conservación de una momia Chinchorro tardía. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 33: 107–11. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-73562001000100019Google Scholar
Csordas, T. 1990. Embodiment as a paradigm for anthropology. Ethos 18: 4–47. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1990.18.1.02a00010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillehay, T. 2012. Selective complexity and adaptive mortuary behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109: 14722–23. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212756109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eicher, J. & Roach-Higgins, M.E.. 1994. Definition and classification of dress, in Barnes, R. & Eicher, J. (ed.) Dress and gender: making and meaning in cultural contexts: 8–28. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Fahlander, F. & Oestigaard, T. (ed.). 2008. The materiality of death: bodies, burials, beliefs, in The materiality of death: bodies, burials, beliefs: 1–16. Oxford: Archaeopress. https://doi.org/10.30861/9781407302577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiore, D. 2020. The art of making images: technological affordance, design variability and labour organization in the production of engraved artefacts and body paintings in Tierra del Fuego (southern South America). Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 27: 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-020-09474-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. 2005. The archaeology of personhood: an anthropological approach. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203583210Google Scholar
Fowler, C. 2016. Relational personhood revisited. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 26: 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, M. & Belmonte, E.. 2016. Las plantas conocidas y amadas por los pescadores Chinchorro: inventario de un legado etnobotánico, in Arriaza, B.T. & Standen, V. (ed.) La Cultura Chinchorro: pasado y presente: 121–35. Arica: Ediciones Universidad de Tarapacá.Google Scholar
Guillén, S.E. 1992. The Chinchorro Culture: mummies and crania in the reconstruction of preceramic coastal adaptation in the south-central Andes. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Hassan, F.A. & Smith, S.J.. 2002. Soul birds and heavenly cows: transforming gender in Predynastic Egypt, in Milledge, S. & M. Rosen-Ayalon, (ed.) In pursuit of gender: worldwide archaeological approaches: 43–65. Lanham (MD): Altamira.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 1986. The appropriation of nature: essays on human ecology and social relations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2006. Rethinking the animate, re-animating thought. Ethnos 71: 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840600603111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaye, C. 2004. Talking around embodiment: the views of GPs following participation in medical anthropology courses. Medical Humanities 30: 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmh.2003.000146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llagostera, A. 2003. Patrones de momificación Chinchorro en las colecciones Uhle y Nielsen. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 35: 5–22. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-73562003000100002Google Scholar
Marquet, P.A. et al. 2012. Emergence of social complexity among coastal hunter-gatherers in the Atacama Desert of northern Chile. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109: 14754–60. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116724109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montt, I. 2014. Representación humana en Chinchorro: un estudio arqueológico visual de momias estatuillas y figurillas (ca. 7000–3250 AP, Arcaico Medio, Arcaico Tardío y Formativo. Costa Norte de Chile). Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universidad Católica del Norte and Universidad de Tarapacá.Google Scholar
Rautman, A. 2000. Reading the body: representations and remains in the archaeological record. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512806830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothhammer, F., Moraga, M., Santoro, C.M. & Arriaza, B.T.. 2010. Origen de los Changos: Análisis de ADNmt antiguo sugiere descendencia de pescadores de la cultura Chinchorro. Revista médica de Chile 138: 251–56. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872010000200016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoro, C.M. et al. 2017a. Loco or no loco? Holocene climatic fluctuations, human demography and community base management of coastal resources in northern Chile. Frontiers in Earth Science 5: 77. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoro, C.M. et al. 2017b. Continuities and discontinities in the socio-environmental systems of the Atacama Desert during the last 18 000 years. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 46: 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2016.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiappacasse, V. & Niemeyer, H.. 1975. Apuntes para el estudio de la transhumancia en el valle de Camarones (provincia de Tarapacá, Chile). Estudios Atacameños 3: 49–52. https://doi.org/10.22199/S07181043.1975.0003.00008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiappacasse, V. & Niemeyer, H.. 1984. Descripción y Análisis Interpretativo de un Sitio Arcaico Temprano en la Quebrada de Camarones (Volume 14: Publicación Ocasional). Santiago: Museo Nacional de Historia Natural.Google Scholar
Sepúlveda, M. et al. 2013. Óxidos de manganeso en el extremo norte de Chile: abastecimiento, producción y movilidad del color negro durante el periodo Arcaico. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 45: 143–59. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-73562013000100007Google Scholar
Sofaer, J. 2006. The body as material culture: a theoretical osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, M.L. 1997. Reading dress: the construction of social categories and identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology 5: 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1179/096576697800703656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standen, V. 1991. El Cementerio Morro–1: neuvas evidencias de la tradición funeraria Chinchorro (período Arcaico, norte de Chile). Unpublished MA dissertation, Universidad Católica de Lima.Google Scholar
Standen, V. 1997. Temprana complejidad funeraria de la Cultura Chinchorro (Norte de Chile). Latin American Antiquity 8: 134–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/971690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standen, V. 2003. Bienes funerarios del cementerio Chinchorro Morro 1: descripción, análisis e interpretación. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 35: 175–207.Google Scholar
Standen, V. & Núñez, L.. 1984. Indicadores antropológico-físico y culturales del cementerio precerámico Tiliviche–2 (Norte de Chile). Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena 12: 135–54.Google Scholar
Standen, V., Santoro, C., Arriaza, B.T. & Coleman, D.. 2018. Hunting, gathering, and fishing on the coast of the Atacama Desert: Chinchorro population mobility patterns inferred from strontium isotopes. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 33: 162–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standen, V.G. et al. 2020. Violence in hunters, fishermen and gatherers of the Chinchorro Culture: archaic societies of the Atacama Desert (10000–4000 cal yr BP). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 172: 227–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhle, M. 1922. Fundamentos étnicos y arqueología de Arica y Tacna. Quito: Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Estudios Históricos Americanos, Imprenta de la Universidad Central.Google Scholar
Van Hoesen, J., Arriaza, B.T., Ryan, P. & Grady, C.. 2019. A multianalytical approach for identifying a manganese source for the black pigment of the Chinchorro mortuary palette. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 34: 322–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Montt et al. supplementary material

Montt et al. supplementary material

Download Montt et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 567.8 KB