Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:52:40.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Repatriation, power relations and the politics of the past

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Tamara L. Bray
Tamara L. Bray*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Wayne State University, Detroit MI 48202, USA. e-mail: TBRAY@CMS.CC.WAYNE.EDU
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Museums across the USA are busy carrying out their new obligations under NAGPRA, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. There is more to the mood than some change in how human remains are curated in archaeological and anthropological collections.

Type
Notes
Information
Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 268 , June 1996 , pp. 440 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1996

References

Geary, P. 1983. Ethnic identity as a situational construct in the early middle ages, Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft 113: 15–26.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. 1992. The potential for future relationships between archaeologists and Native Americans, in Wandsnider, L. (ed.). Quandaries and quests: 59–71. Carbondale (IL); Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University. Occasional Paper 20.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1989. Primate visions. New York (NY): Routledge.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. 1981. The political unconsciousness. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Killion, T. & Bray, T.. 1994. Looking toward Larsen Bay: evolving attitudes at the Smithsonian Institution, in Bray, T. & Killion, T. (ed.), Reckoning with the dead: 3–9. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Loring, S. 1995. Repatriation as a guiding principle for the Arctic studies center, Anthropology Notes 17(1/2): 13–16.Google Scholar
Mangi, J. 1989. The role of archaeology in nation building, in Layton, R. (ed.), Conflict in the archaeology of living traditions: 217–27. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, J. 1986. ‘A sense of history in the making': Australian Aborigines studies 1961–1986, Australian Aboriginal Studies 2: 48–56.Google Scholar
Ranger, T. 1983. The invention of tradition in colonial Africa, in Hobsbawm, E. & Ranger, T. (ed.), The invention of tradition: 211–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shohat, E. 1992. Notes on the post-colonial, Social Text 31/32 10(2-3): 99–113.Google Scholar
Shennan, S. 1989. Introduction: archaeological approaches to cultural identity, in Shennan, S. (ed.), Archaeological approaches to cultural identity: 1–31. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Spegtor, J. 1994. Collaboration at Inyan Ceyaka Atonwan, Society for American Archaeology Bulletin 12(3):8–10.Google Scholar