Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:19:20.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking time, culture and socioeconomic organisation in Bronze Age Transylvania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2020

Colin P. Quinn Open the ORCID record for Colin P. Quinn [Opens in a new window] ,
Horia Ciugudean ,
Gabriel Bălan  and
Gregory Hodgins
Colin P. Quinn*
Affiliation:
Anthropology Department, Hamilton College, USA
Horia Ciugudean
Affiliation:
Muzeul Național al Unirii, Alba Iulia, Romania
Gabriel Bălan
Affiliation:
Muzeul Național al Unirii, Alba Iulia, Romania
Gregory Hodgins
Affiliation:
AMS Laboratory, University of Arizona, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: ✉ cpquinn@hamilton.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

South-west Transylvania was an important source of metal and other natural resources for Bronze Age Europe, helping to facilitate the development of increasingly hierarchical societies. The absence of a radiocarbon-based chronology for Transylvania, however, has impeded understanding of the region's role within broader socioeconomic networks. Here, the presentation of the first radiocarbon chronology for the Wietenberg Culture in south-west Transylvania allows the authors to highlight the importance of interregional exchange and reliable access to metal for Bronze Age European societies, and emphasise that resource-procurement zones follow unique trajectories of socioeconomic organisation.

Keywords

RomaniaTransylvaniaWietenberg CultureBronze AgeBayesian analysisexchange
Type
Research Article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 94 , Issue 373 , February 2020 , pp. 44 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrițoiu, I. 1992. Civilizația tracilor din sud-vestul Transilvaniei în epoca bronzului. Bucharest: Bibliotheca Thracologica Institutul Român de Tracologie.Google Scholar
Bălan, G. & Quinn, C.P.. 2014. Radiocarbon dates of the Middle Bronze Age settlement at Micești-Cigaș (Alba County, Romania). Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Historica 18: 119–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bălan, G., Quinn, C.P. & Hodgins, G.. 2016. The Wietenberg Culture: periodization and chronology. Dacia 60: 67–92.Google Scholar
Bălan, G., Quinn, C.P. & Hodgins, G.. 2018. The cultural and chronological context of the Bronze Age cemetery from Sebeș-Între Răstoace, in Németh, R. & Rezi, B. (ed.) Bronze Age connectivity in the Carpathian Basin: 183–216. Târgu Mureș: Editura MEGA.Google Scholar
Bayliss, A. 2015. Quality in Bayesian chronological models in archaeology. World Archaeology 47: 677–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2015.1067640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boroffka, N. 1994. Die Wietenber-Kultur. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Boroffka, N. 2006. Resursele minerale din România și stadiul actual al cercetărilor privind mineritul preistoric. Apulum 43: 71–94.Google Scholar
Boroffka, N. 2013. Romania, Moldova and Bulgaria, in Fokkens, H. & Harding, A. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of the European Bronze Age: 877–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 41: 337–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200033865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chidioșan, N. 1980. Contribuții la istoria tracilor din nord-vestul României: Așezarea Wietenberg de la Derșida. Oradea: Muzeul Țării Crișurilor.Google Scholar
Ciugudean, H. 2010. The Late Bronze Age in Transylvania (with primary focus on the central and southern areas), in Marta, L. (ed.) Bronze Age chronology in the Carpathian Basin: 147–78. Târgu Mureș: Bibliotheca Mvsei Marisiensis.Google Scholar
Ciugudean, H. 2012. Ancient gold mining in Transylvania: the Roșia Montana-Bucium area. Caiete ARA 3: 101–14.Google Scholar
Ciugudean, H. & Quinn, C.P.. 2015. The end of the Wietenberg Culture in the light of new 14C dates and its chronological relation towards the Noua Culture, in Németh, R., Rezi, B. & Berecki, S. (ed.) Bronze Age chronology in the Carpathian Basin: 147–78. Târgu Mureș: Bibliotheca Mvsei Marisiensis.Google Scholar
Dietrich, L. 2010. Eliten der Frühen und Mittleren Bronzezeit im Südöstlichen Karpatenbecken. Praehistorische Zeitschrift 85: 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/pz.2010.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, L. 2014a. Datele radiocarbon din așezarea aparținând epocii bronzului de la Rotbav (jud. Brașov, România). SCIVA 65: 59–70.Google Scholar
Dietrich, L. 2014b. Die Mittlere und Späte Bronzezeit und Die Ältere Eisenzeit in Südostsiebenbürgen Aufgrund der Siedlung von Rotbav. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Duffy, P.R. 2014. Complexity and autonomy in Bronze Age Europe: assessing cultural developments in Eastern Hungary (Prehistoric Research in the Körös Region 1). Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Duffy, P.R. 2015. Site size hierarchy in middle-range societies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 37: 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2014.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, P.R., Parkinson, W.A., Gyucha, A. & Yerkes, R.W.. 2013. Coming together, falling apart: a multiscalar approach to prehistoric aggregation and interaction on the Great Hungarian Plain, in Birch, J. (ed.) From prehistoric villages to cities: settlement aggregation and community transformation: 44–62. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duffy, P.R., Parditka, G.M., Giblin, J.I. & Paja, L.. 2019. The problem with tells: lessons learned from the absolute dating of Bronze Age mortuary ceramics in Hungary. Antiquity 93: 63–79. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, T.K. & Kristiansen, K.. 2010. Organizing Bronze Age societies: the Mediterranean, Central Europe and Scandinavia compared. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, T.K., Ling, J., Uhnér, C., Stos-Gale, Z. & Melheim, L.. 2015. The political economy and metal trade in Bronze Age Europe: understanding regional variability in terms of comparative advantages and articulations. European Journal of Archaeology 18: 633–57. https://doi.org/10.1179/1461957115Y.0000000008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischl, K.P., Kiss, V., Kulcsár, G. & Szeverényi, V.. 2013. Transformations in the Carpathian Basin around 1600 BC, in Meller, H., Bertemes, F., Bork, H.-R. & Risch, R. (ed.) Cultural change in the shadow of the Thera eruption?: 355–71. Halle: Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt.Google Scholar
Gogâltan, F. 2015. The Early and Middle Bronze Age chronology on the eastern frontier of the Carpathian Basin: revisited after 15 years, in Németh, R. & Rezi, B. (ed.) Bronze Age chronology in the Carpathian Basin: 53–96. Târgu Mureș: Editura MEGA.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. & Krus, A.M.. 2018. The myths and realities of Bayesian chronological modeling revealed. American Antiquity 83: 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2017.57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, A. & Kavruk, V.. 2013. Transylvania, in Harding, A. & Kavruk, V. (ed.) Explorations in salt archaeology in the Carpathian Zone: 41–153. Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar
Horedt, K. 1960. Die Wietenbergkultur. Dacia 4: 107–37.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. 2010. Transkarpacie Kontakty Kultury Otomani-Füzesabony, in Gancarski, J. (ed.) Transkarpackie Kontakty Kulturowe w Epoce Kamienia, Brązu I Wczesnej Epoce Żelaza: 313–30. Krosno: Muzeum Podkarpackie w Krosnie.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. & Kulcsár, G.. 2013. Kakucs-Balla-Domb: a case study in the absolute and relative chronology of the Vatya Culture. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 64: 289–320. https://doi.org/10.1556/AArch.64.2013.2.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. & Ramsey, C. Bronk. 2012. Development and application of the trapezoidal model for archaeological chronologies. Radiocarbon 54: 107–22. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.v54i1.12397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ling, J., Earle, T. & Kristiansen, K.. 2018. Maritime mode of production: raiding and trading in seafaring chiefdoms. Current Anthropology 59: 488–524. https://doi.org/10.1086/699613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melheim, L. et al. 2018. Moving metals III: possible origins for copper in Bronze Age Denmark based on lead isotopes and geochemistry. Journal of Archaeological Science 96: 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2018.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelaki, K. 2006. Household economies: production and consumption of household ceramics among the Maros villagers of Bronze Age Hungary (British Archaeological Reports International series 1503). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Molnár, Z. & Nagy, J.G.. 2013. Habitat models and social systems in Middle Bronze Age central north-western Transylvania: state of research. Acta Archaeologica Carpathica 48: 5–85.Google Scholar
Nicodemus, A. 2014. Bronze Age economies of the Carpathian Basin: trade, craft production, and agro-pastoral intensification. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Nicodemus, A. & O'Shea, J.M.. 2015. From relative to absolute: the radiometric dating of Mureș Culture ceramics at Pecica-Șanțul Mare, in Forțiu, S. & Stavilă, A. (ed.) Archaeovest III: 691–702. Szeged: JATEPress Kiadó.Google Scholar
O'Shea, J.M. 1991. A radiocarbon-based chronology for the Maros Group of southeast Hungary. Antiquity 66: 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00081084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, J.M. 1996. Villagers of the Maros: portrait of an Early Bronze Age society. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, J.M. 2011. A river runs through it: landscape and the evolution of Bronze Age networks in the Carpathian Basin. Journal of World Prehistory 24: 161–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-011-9046-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papalas, C.A. 2008. Bronze Age metallurgy of the eastern Carpathian Basin. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Popa, C.I. & Boroffka, N.. 1996. Considerații privind cultura Noua: Așezarea de la Țichindeal, jud. Sibiu. Studii și Cercetări de Istorie Veche și Arheologie 47: 51–61.Google Scholar
Quinn, C.P. & Ciugudean, H.. 2018. Settlement placement and socio-economic priorities: dynamic landscapes in Bronze Age Transylvania. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 19: 936–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.05.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, C.P., Kuijt, I., Goodale, N. & Néill, J. Ó. 2019. Along the margins? The Later Bronze Age seascapes of western Ireland. European Journal of Archaeology 21: 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2018.27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, P.J. et al. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50 000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55: 1869–87. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szentmiklosi, A., Heeb, B.S., Heeb, J., Harding, A., Kraus, R. & Becker, H.. 2011. Cornești-Iarcuri—a Bronze Age town in the Romanian Banat? Antiquity 85: 819–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00068332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhnér, C. 2012. Society and power: political economy in Bronze Age tell-building communities, in Jaeger, M., Czebreszuk, J. & Fischl, K.P. (ed.) Enclosed space—open society: contact and exchange in the context of Bronze Age fortified settlements in Central Europe: 353–70. Bonn: Poznan.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Quinn et al. supplementary material

Quinn et al. supplementary material

Download Quinn et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 256.9 KB