Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:38:14.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sarmizegetusa bracelets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2010

Bogdan Constantinescu ,
Ernest Oberländer-Târnoveanu ,
Roxana Bugoi ,
Viorel Cojocaru  and
Martin Radtke
Bogdan Constantinescu*
Affiliation:
Horia Hulubei National Institute for Nuclear Physics and Engineering, Atomiştilor 407, Bucharest 077125, Romania
Ernest Oberländer-Târnoveanu
Affiliation:
National History Museum of Romania, Calea Victoriei 12, Bucharest 030026, Romania
Roxana Bugoi
Affiliation:
Horia Hulubei National Institute for Nuclear Physics and Engineering, Atomiştilor 407, Bucharest 077125, Romania
Viorel Cojocaru
Affiliation:
Horia Hulubei National Institute for Nuclear Physics and Engineering, Atomiştilor 407, Bucharest 077125, Romania
Martin Radtke
Affiliation:
BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Richard-Willstätter-Strasse 11, Berlin D-12489, Germany
*
Email: bconst@nipne.ro
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present the authentication and analysis of these beautiful Dacian bracelets of the first century BC, originally pillaged by treasure hunters and recovered thanks to an international crime chase. They were originally fashioned from gold panned from the rivers or dug from the mines of Transylvania and hammered into the form of coiled snakes. The lack of context is the greatest loss, but a votive purpose is likely given their proximity to the great sacred centre at Sarmizegetusa Regia.

Keywords

RomaniaSarmizegetusaDacianfirst century BCgoldbraceletshoardsacred centreWorld Heritage Site
Type
Research articles
Information
Antiquity , Volume 84 , Issue 326 , December 2010 , pp. 1028 - 1042
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berbeleac, I. 1985. Zăcăminte de aur. Bucureşti: Editura Tehnică (in Romanian).Google Scholar
Ciuta, M. 2008. Considerations regarding an archaeological context discovered at Sarmizegetusa Regia: an archaeological-forensic experiment, in Lazăr, A., Deppert-Lippitz, B. & Ferri, P.G. (ed.) Combating the criminality against the European archaeological heritage. Proceedings of the International Conference on Combating the Criminality against the European Archaeological Heritage, Alba Iulia, 28-31 May 2007: 190–202. Bucharest: Lumina Lex.Google Scholar
Cojocaru, V. 2007. On the provenance of ancient gold treasures discovered in Romania, in Degrigny, C., Van Langh, R., Joosten, I. & Ankersmit, B. (ed.) METAL 2007: 1. When archaeometry and conservation meet: interim meeting of the ICOM-CC Metal WG, Amsterdam, 17-21 September 2007: 45–52. Amsterdam: Rijksmuseum Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cojocaru, V., Constantinescu, B., Ştefănescu, I. & Petolescu, C.-M.. 2000. ED-XRF and PAA analyses of Dacian gold coins of ‘koson’ type. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 246(1): 185–90.Google Scholar
Daicoviciu, C. & Daicoviciu, H.. 1963. Sarmizegethusa: les citadelles et les agglomerations daciques des Monts d'Orastie. Bucarest: Editura Meridiane (in French).Google Scholar
Daicoviciu, H. 1972. Dacia de la Burebista la cucerirea romană. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Dacia (in Romanian).Google Scholar
Deppert-Lippitz, B. 2008. Dakische Goldspiralen aus den Orăştie Bergen, in Lazăr, A., Deppert-Lippitz, B. & Ferri, P.G. (ed.) Combating the criminality against the European archaeological heritage. Proceedings of the International Conference on Combating the Criminality against the European Archaeological Heritage, Alba Iulia, 28-31 May 2007: 246–88. Bucharest: Lumina Lex (in German).Google Scholar
Dube, R.K. 2006. Interrelation between gold and tin: a historical perspective. Gold Bulletin 39(3): 103–13.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, A., Rehren, TH. & Pernicka, E.. 1995. The composition of gold from the ancient mining district of Verespatak/Roşia Montană, România, in Morteani, G. & Northover, J.P. (ed.) Prehistoric gold in Europe – mines, metallurgy and manufacture: 369–81. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Medelet, F. 1994. În legătura cu o mare spirală dacică din argint aflată în Muzeul Naţional din Belgrad. Analele Banatului 3: 192–230 (in Romanian).Google Scholar
Oberländer-târnoveanu, E. & Constantinescu, B.. 2008. Surface and compositional analyses regarding the genuineness of some 2nd-1st century BC Dacian gold bracelets found at Sarmizegetusa Regia, during illegal metal-detectoring works: exploring the limits of the classical and modern type forensic investigations in the case of the archaeological artefacts, in Lazăr, A., Deppert, B.-Lippitz & Ferri, P.G. (ed.) Combating the criminality against the European archaeological heritage. Proceedings of the International Conference on Combating the Criminality against the European Archaeological Heritage, Alba Iulia, 28-31 May 2007: 327–33. Bucharest: Lumina Lex.Google Scholar
Pernicka, E. 1986. Provenance determination of metal artifacts: methodological considerations. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 14: 24–9.Google Scholar
Preda, C. 1998. Istoria monedei in Dacia preromană. Bucureşti: Editura Enciclopedică (in Romanian).Google Scholar
Raub, CH. J. 1995. The metallurgy of gold and silver in prehistoric times, in Morteani, G. & Northover, J.P. (ed.) Prehistoric gold in Europe – mines, metallurgy and manufacture: 243–59. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Tylecote, R.H. 1987. The early history of metallurgy in Europe. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar