Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:14:34.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Second World War conflict archaeology in the forests of north-west Europe

Part of: Conflict Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2015

David G. Passmore ,
Stephan Harrison  and
David Capps Tunwell
David G. Passmore*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Toronto (Mississauga), 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
Stephan Harrison
Affiliation:
College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn TR10 9EZ, UK
David Capps Tunwell
Affiliation:
Lieu Dit Le Point Du Jour, 61140 La Chapelle d’Andaine, France
*
*Author for correspondance (Email: david.passmore@utoronto.ca)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Concrete fortifications have long served as battle-scarred memorials of the Second World War. The forests of north-west Europe, meanwhile, have concealed a preserved landscape of earthwork field fortifications, military support structures and bomb- and shell-craters that promise to enhance our understanding of the conflict landscapes of the 1944 Normandy Campaign and the subsequent battles in the Ardennes and Hürtgenwald forests. Recent survey has revealed that the archaeology surviving in wooded landscapes can significantly enhance our understanding of ground combat in areas covered by forest. In particular, this evidence sheds new light on the logistical support of field armies and the impact of Allied bombing on German installations.

Keywords

Second World WarNormandy CampaignArdennes Offensiveconflict archaeologyfield fortificationbomb-craterlogistics depotbattlefield
Type
Research
Information
Antiquity , Volume 88 , Issue 342 , December 2014 , pp. 1275 - 1290
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2014

References

Badsey, S. & Bean, T.. 2004. Omaha Beach. Stroud: Sutton.Google Scholar
Capps Tunwell, D., Passmore, D.G. & Harrison, S.. In press. Landscape archaeology of World War Two German logistics depots in the Forêt domaniale des Andaines, Normandy, France. Journal of Historical Archaeology.Google Scholar
Capps Tunwell, D., Passmore, D.G. & Harrison, S. In preparation a. The archaeology of WW2 bombing in the Forêt domaniale des Andaines, Normandy, France. Submitted to the Journal of Field Archaeology.Google Scholar
Capps Tunwell, D., Passmore, D.G. & Harrison, S. In preparation b. A witness in the landscape: Allied bombing of the Forêt domaniale des Andaines and the Normandy Campaign, France, 1944. Submitted to War in History.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, W.C.C. 2001. A tour of the Bulge Battlefield. Barnsley: Pen & Sword.Google Scholar
Chippindale, C. 1994. Editorial. Antiquity 68: 477–88.Google Scholar
Crutchley, S., Small, F. & Bowden, M.. 2009. Savernake Forest: a report for the National Mapping Programme (English Heritage Research Department Report 29). Portsmouth: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Dobinson, C., Lake, J. & Schofield, A.J.. 1997. Monuments of war: defining England’s 20th-century defence heritage. Antiquity 71: 288–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaffney, C., Gater, J., Saunders, T. & Adcock, J.. 2004. D-Day: geophysical investigation of a World War II German site in Normandy, France. Archaeological Prospection 11: 121–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/arp.233 Google Scholar
Hart, R.A. 1996. Feeding Mars: the role of logistics in the German defeat in Normandy, 1944. War In History 3: 418–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/096834459600300404 Google Scholar
Hennessy, J. 1952. Tactical operations of the Eighth Air Force, 6 June 1944–8 May 1945 (United States Air Force Historical Studies 70). Maxwell (AL): Air Force Historical Research Agency.Google Scholar
Kultur, Konejung Stiftung. 2011. Archäologischer Wanderweg Hürtgenwald 1944–45 (Flyer 94). Vettweiss-Müddersheim: Konejung Stiftung Kultur. Available at: http://www.rureifel-tourismus.de/fileadmin/data/Downloads/Flyer-Archaeologischer.pdf (accessed 10 June 2014).Google Scholar
Lynch, T. & Cooksey, J.. 2007. Battlefield archaeology. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Miller, E.G. 1995. A dark and bloody ground: the H ürtgen Forest and the Roer River dams, 1944–1945. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Moshenska, G. 2013. The archaeology of the Second World War: uncovering Britain’s wartime heritage. Barnsley: Pen & Sword Archaeology.Google Scholar
Osborne, M. 2004. Defending Britain: twentieth-century military structures in the landscape. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Passmore, D.G. & Harrison, S.. 2008. Landscapes of the Battle of the Bulge: WW2 field fortifications in the Ardennes forests of Belgium. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 4: 87–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157407808X382773 Google Scholar
Passmore, D.G., Capps Tunwell, D. & Harrison, S.. 2013. Landscapes of logistics: the archaeology and geography of WW2 German military supply depots in central Normandy, NW France. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 8: 165–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1574077313Z.00000000025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rass, C. & Lohmeier, J.. 2011. Transformations: post-battle processes on the Hürtgenwald battlefield. Journal of Conflict Archaeology 6: 179–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/157407811X13160762840242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reardon, M.J. 2002. Victory at Mortain: stopping Hitler’s Panzer counteroffensive. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. 2008. Destruction preserved: Second World War public air-raid shelters in Hamburg, in Rakoczy, L. (ed.) The archaeology of destruction: 6–28. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Rottman, G.L. 2004. German field fortifications 1939–45. Oxford: Osprey.Google Scholar
Saunders, A. 1998. The Defence of Britain Project, in Schofield, A.J. (ed.) Monuments of war: the evaluation, recording and management of twentieth-century military sites: 7–9. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. 2001. D-Day sites in England: an assessment. Antiquity 75: 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, J. 2004. Modern military matters. Studying and managing the twentieth-century defence heritage in Britain: a discussion document. York: Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Schofield, J. 2005. Combat archaeology: material culture and modern conflict. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Seitsonen, O. & Herva, V.-P.. 2011. Forgotten in the wilderness: WWII German PoW camps in Finnish Lapland, in Myers, A. & Moshenska, G. (ed.) Archaeologies of internment: 171–90. London: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9666-410 Google Scholar
Steinweg, B. & Kerth, M.. 2013. Kriegsbeeinflusste Böden; Böden als Zeugen des Ersten und Zweiten Weltkrieges. Bodenschutz 2/2013: 52–57.Google Scholar
Vogel, R. 1994. Tactical air power in Normandy: some thoughts on the Interdiction Plan. Canadian Military History 3(1): 37–47.Google Scholar
Wegener, W. 2006. Vorstellung Vogelsang—der Westwall im Bereich Nationalpark Eifel. Archäologie im Rheinland 2006: 219–21.Google Scholar
Wegener, W. 2011. Schlachtfeld-Archäologie, in Konejung Stiftung Kultur (ed.) Archäologischer Wanderweg H ürtgenwald 1944–45 (Flyer 94). Vettweiss-Müddersheim: Konejung Stiftung Kultur. Available at: http://www.rureifel-tourismus.de/fileadmin/data/Downloads/Flyer-Archaeologischer.pdf (accessed 10 June 2014).Google Scholar
Woodward, R. 2014. Military landscapes: agendas and approaches for future research. Progress in Human Geography 38: 40–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309132513493219 Google Scholar
Zaloga, S.J. 2007. The Atlantic Wall (1): France. Oxford: Osprey.Google Scholar
Zetterling, N. 2000. Normandy, 1944: German military organization, combat power and organizational effectiveness. Winnipeg: Fedorowicz.Google Scholar