Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:40:14.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sigwells, Somerset, England: regional application and interpretation of geophysical survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Richard Tabor
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1TB, England RTabor8387@aol.com
Paul Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, The Gregory Building, Lilybank Gardens, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland

Abstract

Work by the South Cadbury Environs Project shows that analysing the alignment and morphology of large-scale geophysical data plots can greatly enhance diachronic and synchronic interpretation of a landscape. A pilot study demonstrates that discontinuity of boundary systems features as strongly as continuity in succeeding landscapes.

Type
News and notes
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, L. 1972. By South Cadbury, is that Camelot.. .Excavations at Cadbury Castle 1966–70. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Alcock, L. 1995. Cadbury Castle, Somerset: The early medieval archaeology. Cardiff: University of Wales.Google Scholar
Aston, M.A. & Gerrard, C.M.. 1995. The Shapwick Project: An archaeological, historical and topographical study. The Sixth report. Bristol: Department for Continuing Education, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Barker, G. 1995. A Mediterranean Valley: Landscape archaeology and Annales history in the Biferno Valley. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C., Freeman, P.W.M. & Woodward, A.. 2000. Cadbury Castle Somerset: The later prehistoric and and early historic archaeology. London: English Heritage.Google Scholar
Carreté, J-M., Keay, S. & Millett, M.. 1995. A Roman provincial capital and its hinterland: The survey of the territory of Tarragona, Spain, 1985–1990. Ann Arbor (MI): Journal of Roman Archaeology. Supplementary series 15.Google Scholar
Fowler, P.J. 1983. The farming of prehistoric Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaffney, V.L. & Tingle, M.. 1989. The Maddle Farm Project: an integrated survey of prehistoric and Roman landscapes on the Berkshire Downs. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports. British series 200.Google Scholar
Grinsell, L.V. 1971. Somerset Barrows Part II: North and East, Proceedings of the Somersetshire Archaeological and Natural History Society 115: Supplement.Google Scholar
Leach, P.J. & Tabor, R.J.. 1994. The South Cadbury Environs Project: Project Fieldwork Report 1994. Birmingham: Birmingham University Field Archaeology Unit 327.Google Scholar
Leach, P.J. & Tabor, R.J.. 1997. The South Cadbury Environs Project, Proceedings of the Somerset Archaeological and Natural History Society 139: 4757.Google Scholar
Lyall, J. & Powlesland, D.. 1996. High Resolution Fluxgate Gradiometry (West Heslerton), Internet Archaeology 1.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. 1984. Danebury, an Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire: an aerial photographic interpretation of its environs. London: Royal Commission on Historical Monuments (England). Supplementary series 6.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J.M. 1996. Ploughzone sampling in Denmark: isolating and interpreting site signatures from disturbed contexts, Antiquity 70: 36890.Google Scholar
White, R. & Van Leusen, P.M. Forthcoming. Aspects of Romanization in the Wroxuter Hinterland, TRAC 1996.Google Scholar