Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:11:18.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The stone head from Mšecké Žehrovice: a reappraisal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Ruth  and
Vincent Megaw
Ruth
Affiliation:
School of Humanities, The Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia
Vincent Megaw
Affiliation:
School of Humanities, The Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This fine, and deservedly famous, ragstone head from Czechoslovakia makes an appealing piece with its delightful curling moustaches – ‘perhaps the closest that we have to Celtic self-portraiture’. This new study looks at the head in its context, and notes the pieces that may parallel it.

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 62 , Issue 237 , December 1988 , pp. 630 - 641
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benoît, F. 1955. L’art primitif méditerranéen de la vallée du Rhône, Annaies de la Facilité des Lettres Aix-en-Provence 9.Google Scholar
Benoît, F. 1981. Entremont. Aix-en-Provence: La Pensée Universitaire. 3rd edition.Google Scholar
Bieñkowski, P.R. Von, 1908. Die Darstellungen der Collier in der hellenistischer Kunst. Wien: A. Holder.Google Scholar
Borkovsky, I. 1944–5: Keltská plastika Ž Čechach, Umeni 16: 51–4.Google Scholar
Borkovsky, I. 1946. Keltská tvář v Čechach, Obzor Prehistoricky 13: 16–22.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1978. Il ‘grande donatario’ di Attalo I, in Santoro, P. (ed.), I Galli e l’Italia: 231–55. Rome: Soprindentenza Archeologica di Roma.Google Scholar
Deyts, S. 1983. Les bois sculptés des Sources de la Seine, XLIIe Supplément à Gallio.Google Scholar
Dumontet, M. & Romeuf, A.-M.. 1980. Ex-voto gallo-romains de la Source des Roches à Chamalières. Clermont-Ferrand: Musée Bargoin. Catalogue.Google Scholar
Duval, P.-M. 1977. Les Celtes. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Duval, P.-M. & Kruta, V. (ed.). 1982. L’art celtique de la période d’expansion, IVe et IIIe siècles avant notre ère, Actes du colloque organisé sous les auspices du Collège de France et de la IVe Section de l’Ecole pratique des Hautes Etudes, du 26 au 28 septembre 1978, au Collège de France à Paris. Geneva & Paris: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Engels, H.-J. 1967. Die Hallstatt- und Latènekultur in der Pfalz, Veröffentlichungen der Pfälzischen Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissentschaften in Speyer 55.Google Scholar
Engels, H.-J. 1974. Mater. Hefte zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte der Pfalz 1/Funde der Latènekultur I, Veröffentlichungen der Pfälzischen Gesellschaft zur Fõrderung der Wissenschaften in Speyer 63.Google Scholar
Filip, J. 1949. Praha Pravěká. Prague: Pražské Nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Filip, J. 1956. Keltové ve Střední Evropě - Die Kelten in Mitteleuropa, Monumenta Archaeologica 5. Prague: Ceskoslovenská Akademie Věd.Google Scholar
Filip, J. 1976. Celtic civilization and its heritage. Prague: Academia. 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Finlay, I. 1973. Celtic Art: an introduction. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Frel, J. 1953. Nřkolik poznámek k hlavě z Mšeckých Zehrovic, Casopis Narodního Muzea v Praze 22: 30–46.Google Scholar
Furger-Gunti, A. 1982. Der ‘Goldfund von Saint-Louis’ bei Basel und ähnliche keltische Schatzfunde, Zeitschrift für Schweizerische Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte 39: 1–7.Google Scholar
Green, M. 1986. The gods of the Celts. Gloucester: Alan Sutton.Google Scholar
Greene, K.T. 1975. The Romano-Celtic head from the Bon Marche site, Gloucester: a reappraisal, Antiquaries Journal 55: 338–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, H. 1976. Images of stone: figure sculptures of the Lough Erne Basin. Belfast: Blackstaff Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsthal, P. 1944. Early Celtic Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jankuhn, H. 1966. Zur Deutung der Tierknochenfunde aus La Tene, in Degen, R. et al. (ed.) (1966), Festschrift Emil Vogt/Helvetia Antiqua.: 155–8. Zurich: Conzett & Huber.Google Scholar
Jansova, L. 1966. Kamenna Hlava z Keltskeho oppida nad Zavisti - Der steinerne Kopf vom keltischen oppidum von Závist (Böhmen), Archeologické rozhledy 18: 249–63.Google Scholar
Jansova, L. 1968. Mšecké Žehrovice und die Frage der Viereckschanzen in Böhmen - Mšeckě žehrovice a problém tzv. Viereckschanzen v Cechách, Archeologické rozhledy 20: 470–89.Google Scholar
Jansova, L. 1983. Dva fragmenty kammenych skulptur ze Závisti – Two fragments of stone sculpture from Závist, Památky Archeologické 74: 350–65.Google Scholar
Jorns, W. 1961. Une tête celtique à Dackenheim (Palatinat), OGAM Tradition Celtique 13: 577–80.Google Scholar
Kimmig, W. 1985. Eisenzeitliche Grabstelen in Mitteleuropa, in Studi di Paleoetnologia in onore di Salvatore M. Puglisi: 591–615. Rome: Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’.Google Scholar
Kruta, V., Lessing, E. & Szabó, M.. 1978. Les Celtes. Fribourg & Paris: Hatier.Google Scholar
Kruta, V. & Szabó, M.. 1982. Canthares danubiens du IIIe siècle a.n.è.: un exemple d’influence hellénistique sur les Celtes orientaux, Etudes Celtiques 19: 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Künzl, E. 1971. Die Kelten des Epigonos von Pergamon/Beiträge zur Archäologie 4. Würzburg: Triltsch.Google Scholar
Künzl, E. 1983. Les Celtes dans l’art de Pergame, in L’expansion des Celtes de la Gaule vers l’Orient/Les Dossiers, Histoire et Archéologie, no. 77, 61–9.Google Scholar
Lambrechts, P. 1954. L’exaltation de la tête dans la pensée et dans l’art des Celtes, Dissertationes Archeologicae Condenses II.Google Scholar
Lenerz-De Wilde, M. 1982. Le ‘Style de Cheshire Cat’: un phénomène caractéristique de l’art celtique, in Duval, & Kruta, (1982): 101–14.Google Scholar
Lorenz, H. 1978. Totenbrauchtum und Tracht. Untersuchungen zur regionalen Gliederung in der frühen Latènezeit, Bericht der Römisch-Germanischen Kommission 59: 3–380.Google Scholar
Megaw, J.V.S. 1965–6. Two La Tène finger-rings in the Victoria and Albert Museum, London, Praehistorische Zeitschrift 43–44: 96–166.Google Scholar
Megaw, J.V.S. 1970a. Art of the European Iron Age: a study of the elusive image. Bath: Adams and Dart.Google Scholar
Megaw, J.V.S. 1970b. Cheshire Cat and Mickey Mouse: analysis, interpretation and the art of the La Tène Iron Age, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 36:, 261–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megaw, J.V.S. & Megaw, M.R. 1989. Early Celtic art. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Megaw, R. & Megaw, V.. 1986. Early Celtic art in Britain and Ireland. Princes Risborough: Shire Books.Google Scholar
Merrifield, R. 1987. The archaeology of ritual and magic. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Moosleitner, F. 1985. Die Schnabelkanne vom Dürrnberg: ein Meisterhandwerk keltischer Kunst/Schriftreihe des Salzburger Museum Carolino Augusteum 7.Google Scholar
Motykovàk, ., Drda, P. & Rybova, A.. 1977. The position of Závist in the Early La Tène period in Bohemia - Postavení Závisti v Casné době laténské v Cechách, Památky Archeoíogické LXVIII, 255–316.Google Scholar
Motykovàk, ., Drda, P. & Rybova, A.. 1986. Systematic investigations of the Celtic hillfort of Závist in 1980–1984, in Pleiner, and Hrala, 1986, 135–42.Google Scholar
Neustupný, E. & J. 1960. Czechoslovakia before the Slavs. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Petres, E.F. & Szabó, M.. 1974. A Keleti Kelta Múvészet-Eastern Celtic Art. Székesferhérvár: István Király Mùzeum.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1978. Nemeton, Temenos, Bothros: sanctuaries of the ancient Celts, in I Celti e la loro cultura nell’epoca pre-Romana e Romana nella Britannia. Academia Nazionale dei Lincei 375: 37–54.Google Scholar
Pleiner, R. & Hrala, P. (ed.). 1986. Archaeology in Bohemia 1981–1985. Prague: Archaeological Institute of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Powell, T.G.E. 1958. The Celts. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Princ, M. 1986. Celtic oppidum at Hradiště by České-Lhotice, district of Chrudim, in Pleiner, & Hrala, (1986) 149–56.Google Scholar
Romeuf, A.-M. 1986. Ex-voto en bois de Chamalières (Puy-de-Dôme) et des Sources de la Seine: essai de comparaison, Gallia 44: 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, A. 1967. Pagan Celtic Britain. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ross, A. 1986. The Pagan Celts. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Rynne, E. 1966. Some Irish affinities with the Mšecké Žehrovice stone, Sborník Narodního Muzea v Praze A 20: 151–4.Google Scholar
Salviat, F. 1973. Entremont antique. Aix-en-Provence: Les Amis d’Entremont et du pays d’Aix antique.Google Scholar
Salviat, F. 1979. La sculpture pré-romaine en Provence, in Aux Temps des Gaulois en Gaule méridionale/Dossiers de l’Archéologie no. 35, 31–51.Google Scholar
Sandars, N.K. 1985. Prehistoric Art in Europe. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Schober, A. 1936. Das Gallierdenkmal Attalos I in Pergamon, Romische Mitteilungen 51: 489-.Google Scholar
Stead, I.M. 1985. Celtic art in Britain before the Roman conquest. London: British Museum Publications.Google Scholar
Szabó, M. 1963. A Badacsony-Lábdi kettósfej kérdéséhez, Archeológiai Értesító: 90: 69–74.Google Scholar
Szabó, M. 1965. A Celtic double head from Badacsony-Lábdi, Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae 17: 233–50.Google Scholar
Szabó, M. 1971. The Celtic heritage in Hungary. Budapest: Corvina.Google Scholar
Szabó, M. 1972. Celtic art and history in the Carpathian basin, Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientarum Hunga-ricae 24: 385–93.Google Scholar
Szabó, M. 1973. Eléments régionaux dans l’art des Celtes orientaux, Etudes Celtiques 13: 750–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabó, M. 1983. Originalité et richesse de l’art celtique orientale, in L’expansion des Celtes de la Gaule vers l’Orient/ Les Dossiers, Histoire et Archéologie, no. 77: 20–9.Google Scholar
Toynbee, J.M.C. 1962. Art in Roman Britain. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Venclová, N. 1983. Archeologický výzkum laténského sidliště a čtyřùhelníkových valu Mšechych Žehrovicích – Archaeological excavations of the La Téne settlement and quadrangular enclosure at Mšecké žehrovice, in Geofyzika a archeologie, Sborník 4, celostátního symposia: 111–14.Google Scholar
Venclová, N. 1986. Excavations of a La Tene settlement and of a square-walled enclosure (Viereckschanze) at the site of Mšecké žehrovice, in Pleiner, & Hrala, (1986): 157–62.Google Scholar