Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:05:48.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Textiles, dates and identity in the late occupation of the Huacas de Moche, Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2024

Jeffrey Quilter*
Affiliation:
Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
Carlos Rengifo*
Affiliation:
Proyecto Arqueológico Huacas de Moche, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Perú
Moisés Tufinio
Affiliation:
Proyecto Arqueológico Huacas de Moche, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Perú
Enrique Zavaleta
Affiliation:
Proyecto Arqueológico Huacas de Moche, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Perú
Amy Oakland
Affiliation:
College of Letters, Arts and Social Sciences, California State University East Bay, Hayward, USA
Lizbeth Pariona Muñoz
Affiliation:
Escuela de Arqueología, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Perú
Paul Szpak
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada
Maria Goretti Mieites Alonso
Affiliation:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, USA
Nobuko Shibayama
Affiliation:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, USA
Anahi Maturana-Fernandez
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Trent University, Peterborough, Canada
*
*Authors for correspondence ✉ quilter@fas.harvard.edu & carloserengifo@gmail.com
*Authors for correspondence ✉ quilter@fas.harvard.edu & carloserengifo@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeological cultures present allegories of ethnic identities across the centuries or millennia but such conceptualisations are necessarily incomplete and lack the resolution to explore transitions between cultures. Here, exploration of the archaeological contexts, production methods, stylistic variation and radiocarbon dating of 20 preserved textile fragments facilitates an examination of cultural change at Huaca del Sol (Huacas de Moche, northern Peru). While occupants of the site experienced many outside cultural influences, including those from the highland Wari Empire, continuity in textile traditions suggests that some sense of Moche identity was maintained through the tenth century and after the perceived end of the Moche culture.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd

Introduction

Ethnicity and other aspects of identity have long been of interest to ethnologists (e.g. Barth Reference Barth1969; Cohen Reference Cohen1978), archaeologists (e.g. Jones Reference Jones1997; Hales & Hodas Reference Hales and Hodas2010) and historians (e.g. Hall Reference Hall2000; Sun Reference Sun2021). While ethnicity can be expressed in many ways, archaeological investigation of identity relies mostly on material remains, linguistics (Heggarty & Beresford Jones Reference Heggarty and Beresford Jones2012), and, for later periods, ethnohistories (Wester Reference Wester2021). Yet, essentialised ‘archaeological cultures’ have long defined and described prehistory in the Central Andes, where artefact types seem to fit neatly into spatial and temporal grids or have been made to do so. But coloured regions on maps and neatly stacked sequential chronologies inhibit exploration of contemporary or diachronic transitions between one essentialised culture and the next.

Here, we follow Hornborg and Hill's (Reference Hornborg, Hill, Hornborg and Hill2011: 2) definition of ethnic identity as a means by which a group's distinctiveness may be expressed, developing in relation to external sociocultural forces. Ethnicity exists in a dynamic relationship with alterity: ‘us’ versus ‘them’ (Lau Reference Lau2012). While we recognise that identity is nuanced, flexible, hybrid and varied, it is through the examination of cultural capital that we discern what was meaningful and valuable to the people whose pasts we investigate (Bourdieu Reference Bourdieu and Richardson1986). For the ancient Andes, textiles were one of the most valuable and meaningful forms of material culture and the expression of identity (Murra Reference Murra1962; Oakland Rodman Reference Oakland Rodman1992). We offer a case study that tackles the notion of identifying identity, primarily through textiles, in a transition period on the north coast of Peru at one of the region's most noted sites, the Huacas de Moche archaeological complex.

Culture history and Huacas de Moche

The Moche archaeological culture is one of the best-known prehistoric Andean cultures after the Inca, famed for its brightly decorated temple complexes (huacas), elaborately buried elites—such as the Lord of Sipán (Alva Reference Alva2015)—and its ‘veristic’ art, especially on numerous painted ceramic vessels. The Moche have also attracted scholarly attention owing to their status as one of the earliest complex societies in South America, the nature of which has been debated for many years (Quilter & Castillo Reference Quilter and Castillo2010; Quilter & Koons Reference Quilter and Koons2012).

Construction at Moche is generally dated as starting in the third or fourth centuries AD, during the Early Intermediate period (AD 1–650), with its largest architectural complex at Huacas de Moche (Figures 1, 2, 3 & 4; Uceda et al. Reference Uceda, Morales and Mujica2016). Over the following two centuries, Moche and other huaca complexes grew and prospered with significant sociopolitical changes occurring c. AD 650. While the causes continue to be debated (Uceda et al. Reference Uceda, Gayoso, Castillo and Rengifo2021), these changes coincide with the arrival of the Wari, a cultural and political power based at the southern highland city of Huari. The Wari empire's influence ranges from direct military intervention to indirect cultural shifts, and its effects on local traditions were so strong that this period is considered a distinct era, the Middle Horizon (AD 650–1000), though the temporal waxing and waning of Wari influence varied in different regions (Jennings Reference Jennings2010).

Figure 1. Map of Peru showing the location of sites mentioned in the text: red dots indicate modern towns; green dots indicate archaeological sites (figure by authors).

Figure 2. Huacas de Moche site plan (figure by Huacas de Moche Archaeological Project).

Figure 3. Huaca del Sol with urban zone remains in the foreground (photograph by authors).

Figure 4. Left) aerial view of Huaca del Sol annotated with Sections 1–4 and excavation units in Section 4; right) detail of level 2 features in the western portion of excavation unit 1 (figure by authors).

The Wari heartland eventually fragmented into small competing chiefdoms (Dulanto Reference Dulanto, Silverman and Isbell2008) while northern and southern Moche regions became the domains of two archaeological cultures, Lambayeque (or Sicán) and Chimú, respectively, in the Late Intermediate period (AD 1000–1450). North-coast archaeologists generally consider c. AD 850 to be the end of the Moche culture. Lambayeque dates to AD 800–1375 (Shimada Reference Shimada1995) and was conquered by Chimú in three campaigns, perhaps beginning in the early 1300s, and completed by the mid-fifteenth century (Mackey Reference Mackey, Marcus and Williams2009). The picture is complicated by the fact that there is no clear date for the beginning of Chimú at its capital city, Chan Chan, in the lower Moche Valley which is not far from Huacas de Moche. Furthermore, the dates proposed for early Lambayeque overlap the new dates we have obtained for the occupation of the Huacas de Moche, raising issues concerning culture change in the region. It is precisely these concerns that make our analyses relevant to the study of ethnogenesis and identity.

The site of Huacas de Moche plays a significant role in understanding central Andean prehistory with numerous scholars drawn to it due to its large size and proximity to Trujillo, one of Peru's largest modern cities. The first archaeological research at the site was conducted by German archaeologist Max Uhle in 1899–1900 (Uhle Reference Uhle1913). Subsequent large-scale excavations have continued to investigate the site's development and its role in culture change, notably the Harvard Chan Chan–Moche Valley Project (Donnan & Mackey Reference Donnan and Mackey1978; Moseley & Deeds Reference Moseley, Deeds, Moseley and Day1982) and the Proyecto Arqueológico Huacas de Moche (Uceda et al. Reference Uceda, Morales and Mujica2016; Morales & Rengifo Reference Morales and Rengifo2021; Rengifo et al. Reference Rengifo, Gayoso and Castillo2022).

While excavating the Huaca del Sol, Uhle found ‘foreign’ ceramic and textile styles among ‘classic’ Moche remains. He associated these artefacts with the Tiwanaku Culture of Bolivia although subsequent research reclassified the artefacts as Wari (Menzel Reference Menzel1964, Reference Menzel1977). Although outside influences affecting north-coast cultures were thus recognised a century ago, one late-twentieth-century school of thought saw environmental catastrophes, including mega El Niño events, as contributors to social change (Moseley Reference Moseley1983; Craig & Shimada Reference Craig and Shimada1986). In recent studies, however, sociopolitical responses to such climatic events have been championed with emphasis on cultural flexibility and resilience (Sandweiss & Quilter Reference Sandweiss and Quilter2008; Caramanica Reference Caramanica2022). Similarly, while Moche culture was thought to have ended in the second half of the eighth century it is now recognised as having continued, although significantly changed, well into the ninth century and, as our research suggests, even later.

Huacas de Moche and Huaca del Sol

Huacas de Moche covers approximately 50ha in the lower Moche Valley and consists of three major constructions: Huaca del Sol and the Old and New Temples of Huaca de la Luna (Figure 2). Platforms, plazas and a residential sector occupy the plain between these buildings. The Old Temple of Huaca de la Luna was the main focus of activity early in the development of Huacas Moche, but construction stopped c. AD 650 and the New Temple was built next to it. The early use of Huaca del Sol is uncertain but it attained its present size in its final phase with the inclusion of a residential compound and a possible elite residence on its summit (Figure 4).

Huaca del Sol was excavated by Uhle (Reference Uhle1913) and, more recently, by Moisés Tufinio and colleagues (2014); both excavations noted a cemetery on the large southern terrace, now called Section 4 (see Figure 4), from which textiles and other artefacts have been recovered (Zavaleta et al. Reference Zavaleta, Cruz, Lázaro, Pariona, Vilca, Morales and Rengifo2021; Oakland Reference Oakland, Farmer and Koontz2022; Pariona Reference Pariona2022). Tufinio's investigations concentrated in units 1–3, three areas of Section 4. On the surface of unit 2 were hearths, ashes and two quincha (wattle-and-daub) structures; a looting hole dug into the mound revealed deeper plastered walls. Unit 3 held rooms and hearths.

The cemetery was uncovered in unit 1. Mingling of bones and artefacts in the upper levels and disturbance in lower levels suggests the reuse of the area for burials over time. Recovered material includes: Moche IV ceramics—c. AD 650–850 at Huacas Moche, which was Moche ceramics’ penultimate phase—mixed with textiles and ceramics that are not Moche in style; Casma impressed and stamped pottery; a few Wari and Cajamarca ceramics; and hundreds of fragmented Moche clay trumpets and whistles (Tufinio et al. Reference Tufinio, Chávarri, Vega, Gamboa, Uceda and Morales2013: fig. 65). Within and below the disturbed levels, the platform was filled with cellular chambers each measuring about 1 × 1m or 1 × 2m, made by removing adobe bricks from the floor. These chambers were former tombs, but all except three (tombs 1, 2 and 3) lacked burials. Beneath 0.48m of fill, Tufinio excavated organic material from 20 Pozos, chambers filled with burial remains but not clearly tombs, and 10 groups of clustered artefacts. Few textiles have been recovered at Huacas de Moche, but the preservation of those in Section 4 is exceptional, allowing us to date them and to use dates and styles to infer cultural change at Huaca del Sol.

The textiles

More than 200 textile fragments were excavated from the cemetery of Huaca del Sol units 1 and 2. From these we selected 20 textile fragments and sampled 5–7 yarns (between 40 and 80mm in length) from each. Fibres represented both cotton and camelid hair and the textiles were both plain weave and decorated fragments. We selected examples from tombs 1, textile samples (# 4, 5, 7–10), 2 (#11) and 3 (#6) from pozos 4 (#14), 13 (#15 & 20) and 17 (#1–3) and from artefact groups 4 (#12) and 5 (#13, 16–19) (see online supplementary material (OSM) for details). Textiles 1–15 were previously illustrated and reported (Pariona Reference Pariona2022; Zavaleta et al. Reference Zavaleta, Cruz, Lázaro, Pariona, Vilca, Morales and Rengifo2021). Our selection is representative of the total collection and the 20 examples were classified into four types based on image and production method.

Moche textile types from Huaca del Sol appear strikingly similar in both pattern and structure to early Moche textiles reported from Huacas de Moche (Gayoso Reference Gayoso2007; Fernández Reference Fernández, Uceda, Mujica and Morales2008), Sipán (Prümers Reference Prümers2007), Virú (Surette Reference Surette2015) and Pacatnamú (Donnan & Donnan Reference Donnan, Donnan, Donnan and Cock1997). All Moche textiles were woven with cotton fibres spun in a horizontal method that produces yarn oriented in the S direction. These S-spun cotton yarns were used singly or paired (#14) and are particular to Moche and other northern groups. Single S-cotton yarns sharply contrast with yarns produced in southern and highland regions where the vertical, drop spindle is used, a method that produces yarns in a Z direction that are always plied (containing multiple strands).

The Huaca del Sol textiles that we examined were woven in slit-tapestry (#7), supplementary wefts (#2, 8, 13, 17–18) and double cloth (#11), which are all techniques used in early Moche textiles. Cotton twill weaves common to the early Moche were recovered, but most Huaca del Sol Moche types were woven with a cotton base and patterned in supplementary-weft techniques in diamond grid patterns that resemble twill structures (O'Neale Reference O'Neale1946). Weft-based designs include familiar Moche figures such as the ‘crab-man’ (#6, Figure 5a) and a humanoid with a long snake belt (#12, Figure 5b).

Figure 5. Textiles incorporating Moche and Wari images: a) crab man; b) snake belt man; c) Wari staff-bearing figures (figure by authors).

A second textile type discovered at Huaca del Sol is woven in warp-patterned technique with Moche S-spun cotton yarns and camelid fibre yarns in supplementary-warps (#3), float weaves (#16) and warp substitution (#19–20) (Oakland Reference Oakland, Farmer and Koontz2022). Warp-patterning is generally considered highland in style and most highland textiles are woven with camelid fibre yarns (Rowe Reference Rowe1977). This Huaca del Sol type combines Moche S-spun cotton used in weft and in warp along with camelid fibre and is often woven in long, narrow panels. A large fragment (575 × 170mm) discovered near the female in tomb 1 (#5) suggests that this warp-patterned textile may have formed part of this individual's clothing. The style appears to be a hybrid type woven with local Moche cotton yarns in highland techniques. For this reason, we named the style Highland-Moche.

Examples of tie-dye—a distinctive Wari textile—were excavated on Huaca del Sol (Pariona Reference Pariona2022: photographs 50 & 56), but due to their small sizes (<60mm) we chose to date other camelid-fibre Wari-associated textiles. One is woven in a discontinuous warp and weft technique (#4) known as Wari or Nasca-Wari style and another is woven in dovetailed-tapestry (#15) similar in design to a fragment excavated by Uhle at Pachacamac (Pariona Reference Pariona2022: fig. 48b).

A fourth category of textiles from Huaca del Sol, known as Moche-Wari, combines both Moche S-spun cotton yarns with Wari imagery. Examples include the Wari staff-bearing figures patterning a tapestry bag (#1, Figure 5c) (Pariona Reference Pariona2022: 140) and a tapestry panel with similar figures excavated by Uhle in the same location (Uhle Reference Uhle1913: fig. 16.1; O'Neale & Kroeber Reference O'Neale and Kroeber1930: fig. 13; Menzel Reference Menzel1977: fig. 89; Oakland Reference Oakland, Farmer and Koontz2022: figs. 4 & 15). Another Moche-Wari tapestry from Huaca del Sol possibly formed the bottom portion of a man's shirt (#10), and Moche-Wari garments are also reported at Huaca Pucllana (in Lima), Chimu Capac and Ancón (Young-Sanchez Reference Young-Sanchez2000; Oakland Reference Oakland2020; Chuchón Reference Chuchón and Flores2021). Other narrow tapestry bands (#9) from Huaca del Sol may originally have been part of these Moche-Wari shirts. Huaca del Sol textiles are closely related to the Moche-Wari textiles recovered from the large destroyed cemetery at Castillo de Huarmey (Prümers Reference Prümers1990, Reference Prümers2001; Laszczka & Prządka-Giersz Reference Laszczka and Prządka-Giersz2020) and also to Moche-Wari styles—identified by their S-spun cotton yarns—outside of Moche at Chimu Capac (Oakland Reference Oakland2020), Catalina Huanca (Thays & Cornejo Reference Thays, Cornejo and Cornejo2021), Huaca Pucllana (Chuchón Reference Chuchón and Flores2021), Huaca Malena (Ángeles & Pozzi-Escot Reference Ángeles and Pozzi-Escot2001) and Ancón (Young-Sanchez Reference Young-Sanchez2000).

Isotope and dye analyses

Fibres were taken from 13 of the 20 Huaca del Sol textiles for further analyses. We compared the stable carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotope values of the Huaca del Sol textiles to fibres interpreted as primarily of highland and coastal origins from the Chancay Valley and Pacatnamu, respectively (Szpak et al. Reference Szpak, Millaire, White, Lau, Surette and Longstaffe2015, Reference Szpak, Millaire, White, Donnan and Longstaffe2018) (Figure 6; see OSM). The Chancay Valley textiles feature highland camelid fibres (low δ13C values and low bivariate isotopic variation) whereas the Pacatnamu textiles present isotopic compositions with high δ13C values uncommon to the highlands and high bivariate isotopic variations, suggesting that these camelid fibres were obtained from coastal camelids. Although the Huaca del Sol sample is small, the data show that the textiles were not exclusively derived from wool imported from the highlands and some of the animals were likely raised at lower altitudes and had diets high in C4 plants, likely maize. The overall pattern of isotopic variation in the Huaca del Sol samples is similar to fibres from textiles from the Virú and Santa valleys, south of Trujillo (Szpak et al. Reference Szpak, Millaire, White, Lau, Surette and Longstaffe2015, Reference Szpak, Millaire, Chapdelaine, White and Longstaffe2019), and from Pacatnamú to the north, all of which have been interpreted as being predominantly composed of wool from non-highland camelids.

Figure 6. δ13C and δ15N values of camelid hair from the Huaca del Sol textiles compared with fibres of highland (Chancay Valley) and coastal (Pacatnamu) origins (figure by authors).

Dye analysis, using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), was conducted on 18 samples from 12 of the Huaca del Sol textiles (Table S2). Carminic acid was found in all red fibres identifying the dye as cochineal (Dactylopius coccus). Two blue and blue-green fibres were composed of indigotin, indirubin and carminic acid indicating that indigo and cochineal were both used, perhaps to dye the textile purple. An as-yet-unidentified flavonoid dye was used for yellow. In addition, ellagic acid was in almost all samples suggesting a high-tannin source from the soil. All these dyes have been reported from Peruvian textile collections (Armitage et al. Reference Armitage, Fraser, Degano and Perla Colombini2019) and cochineal was previously identified in two Moche textiles (Phipps Reference Phipps2010).

Radiocarbon analyses

Twenty samples, representative of the complete collection excavated in 2013 from unit 1, were directly dated using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) (Table 1). These dates were subsequently calibrated in OxCal 4.4 (Bronk Ramsey Reference Bronk Ramsey2021), using the SHCal20 Southern Hemisphere calibration curve (Hogg et al. Reference Hogg2020). The calibration chart (Figure 7) presents the dating results, with the highest confidence calibration levels falling in the tenth century AD. The date ranges for three Moche style and three Highland-Moche samples straddle the AD 1000 line, while the dates of the Wari and Moche-Wari samples range slightly earlier.

Table 1. Calibrations of 20 AMS dates. Columns refer to: style/culture of the textile, reference number for this article, laboratory number, and standard deviation of the uncalibrated date. The rest of the columns refer to the percentage probabilities from high to low of the dates falling into the time ranges in the adjacent column.

Figure 7. Calibrations of 20 AMS dates. R Date codes include the textile number and the excavation context as presented in the OSM and Figure 4 (figure by authors).

The six textile samples from tomb 1 were discovered in levels 2, 4 and 6. Tomb 1 was reopened and reused multiple times, probably with the additions of textiles into the tomb with each refilling (Tufinio et al. Reference Tufinio, Tufinio, Chavarri, Gamboa, Velásquez, Uceda and Morales2014: 163–4). The condition of the tomb 1 textiles—most torn into small fragments—suggests that earlier burials were disturbed as the tomb was reused and that fragments left on the surface became mixed with tomb fill during subsequent rituals at different periods. Uhle (Reference Uhle1913: 111) made a similar observation upon discovering fragments of a Wari ceramic cup on the surface of the cemetery and a sherd of the same cup plastered into the closing wall of a later tomb. Some Wari and Moche-Wari textiles may have been heirlooms when they were added to the burials, but they remained part of a living culture at the time of their deposition and part of a period of change.

Our AMS dates represent the time of the harvesting of the cotton and camelid hair used to make the textiles, yet these taphonomic and social factors involved in their deposition present complications that urge caution in dating the burials themselves. Some burials may have occurred as early as the ninth century, but the late tenth–early eleventh century is a terminus post quem.

Ceramics

Sherd counts and percentages are not accurate indicators of the frequency of ceramic types but in highly disturbed contexts, such as those found at Huaca del Sol, they may provide a rough indicator of culture persistence and change. Four categories were described for decorated pottery at the time of excavation and in subsequent analyses: Moche, Castillo, Chimú and other. Castillo is a serving ware of long duration beginning in early Moche times. ‘Other’ includes Cajamarca, Casma (?), Wari and unidentified styles. Further analysis of the category Chimú suggests that examples of reduced-fired ceramics could also be described as Moche or Lambayeque and are here named Blackwares.

Excavations in unit 1 revealed three levels where Moche sherds were greater in number than any other type (level 1: n = 199, 27%; level 2: n = 250, 34%; level 3: n = 75, 17%). Moche sherds are less numerous in the tombs, where ‘other’ types dominate, but are nonetheless present. The counts and percentages for all Section 4 excavations (unit 1, tombs, pozos/pits and trench) also show a significant representation of Moche sherds (27.3%, compared with 25.9% Blackwares, 0.6% Castillo and 46.2% other; Tufinio et al. Reference Tufinio, Tufinio, Chavarri, Gamboa, Velásquez, Uceda and Morales2014: fig. 58).

Uhle (Reference Uhle1913: 110) states that thousands of whistles and trumpet fragments were discovered, and Tufinio and colleagues (2014: 162) describe 799 sherds of various types of musical instruments found throughout Section 4. These Moche instruments were discovered throughout Huacas de Moche (Scullin & Boyd Reference Scullin and Boyd2014) providing evidence for the continuance of a Moche burial tradition on Huaca del Sol. Despite disturbance to the upper levels of Section 4, the relative quantity of Moche ceramics suggests that the Moche style was valued by the late inhabitants of Huaca del Sol even if some were only maintained as heirlooms. The same ceramic types have also been found elsewhere at the site. In addition, Uhle found two offering caches: one below the disturbed levels containing Moche-style gold ornaments and the other between an adobe surface and a wall containing early Wari-style ceramics and Moche-style ceramic figurines (Menzel Reference Menzel1977: 39). These finds suggest both Moche continuity as well as Wari influence.

Discussion

Until recently it is likely that no one referred to themselves as Moche; the word has an uncertain meaning in a language spoken north of the Moche Valley and was first documented a millennium after the Moche expired (see Urban Reference Urban2019: 115–16). Nevertheless, the archaeological culture that we call Moche clearly represents a distinct sociocultural phenomenon and identity for those people who participated in it.

The coastal Moche may have first developed in reaction to the arrival of highland groups (serranos), as in evidence by numerous sites with highland-style sherds and house forms in the nearby chaupiyunga—the rich agricultural lands of the middle Moche Valley (Billman Reference Billman2002; Billman et al. Reference Billman, Ringberg, Bardoph and Briceño Rosario2023)—highlanders were always a concern to coastal peoples. At the height of Moche culture, c. AD 450–550, highland communities seem to have been rather insular, yet in the Middle Horizon (AD 650–1000), Wari southern highland influences were present at Huacas de Moche, as were coastal Cajamarca style ceramics (cf. Tsai Reference Tsai2019). Evidence from textiles analysed here suggests that other serranos also interacted with the Moche.

Hybrid artefacts from late Moche contexts signal adaption to a Middle Horizon world. The continuance of a late Moche presence on Huaca del Sol apparently deterred any Lambayeque intrusion allowing the rise of Chimu in the southern region. The people who lived at Huaca del Sol may no longer have thought of themselves as Moche, per se, even though they continued to use symbols and techniques from the past. Just as determining the cultural identity of any prehistoric community is fraught with difficulties, so too is identifying how they came to take on a new one. It appears, however, that the transition between identities, at least on Huaca del Sol, may have been relatively short, and that untangling highland-coastal interactions will continue to underpin our understanding of the Moche.

Conclusions

Our work suggests that a Moche identity was maintained at Huacas de Moche until the end of the tenth century. Textiles found at Huaca del Sol show four distinct styles: one continuing earlier Moche technical and decorative styles; a second employing hybrid Highland-Moche techniques; a third with Moche and Wari influences; and a fourth, Wari style. Together with evidence from ceramics and burial practices, this indicates that the late occupants of Huacas de Moche lived in a world that differed substantially from the experiences of earlier inhabitants. Our research indicates that long-standing Moche material cultural practices and styles continued to be valued at Huacas de Moche, long after the presumed end of the archaeological culture. Textiles were constructed using the same methods as early Moche types and incorporated imagery that continued to express Moche beliefs. In the final centuries of the Moche, new burial traditions were adopted and foreign styles and techniques were mixed with the more traditional styles. Yet some sense of Moche identity appears to have been maintained, even as the world about them changed.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Ministry of Culture of Perú for granting permission for the analysis of samples under Resolución Viceministerial Nr. 000268-2021-VMPCIC/MC. Brian Billman and Jennifer Ringberg are thanked for providing details on early chaupiyunga settlements. Two reviewers of an earlier draft of the manuscript also helped us to clarify our thoughts and produce a better article and special thanks are offered to Lindsey Elstub, Editorial Manager for Antiquity, for her help in handling final details for our resubmission.

Funding statement

The research was funded by the Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Patronato Huacas del Valle de Moche, the Peabody Museum of Archaeology & Ethnology, Harvard University and personal sources.

Online supplementary materials (OSM)

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2024.138 and select the supplementary materials tab.

References

Alva, W. 2015. Sipán: descubrimiento e investigación. Lima: Edición del Autor.Google Scholar
Ángeles, R. & Pozzi-Escot, D.. 2001. Textiles del horizonte medio: las evidencias de Huaca Malena, Valle de Asia. Boletin de Arqueologia PUCP 4: 401–24. https://doi.org/10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.200001.013Google Scholar
Armitage, R., Fraser, D., Degano, I. & Perla Colombini, M.. 2019. The analysis of the Saltzman Collection of Peruvian dyes by high performance liquid chromatography and ambient ionization mass spectrometry. Heritage Science 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-019-0319-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, F. 1969. Ethnic groups and boundaries: the social organization of culture difference. New York: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Billman, B. 2002. Irrigation and the origins of the southern Moche state on the north coast of Peru. Latin American Antiquity 13: 371400. https://doi.org/10.2307/972222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billman, B.R., Ringberg, J., Bardoph, D.N. & Briceño Rosario, J.. 2023 Negotiating identities: understanding highland-coastal interaction in the Early Intermediate period in the Chaupiyunga of the Moche Valley, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 34: 329–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/laq.2022.32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital, in Richardson, J.G. (ed.) Handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education: 241–58. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2021. OxCal v.174. Available at: https://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/oxcal.htmlGoogle Scholar
Caramanica, A. 2022. Building resilience from risk: interactions across ENSO, local environment, and farming systems on the desert north coast of Peru (1100BC–AD1460). The Holocene 32: 1410–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/09596836221121772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuchón, H. 2021. Análisis del material textil procedente de la Tumba de las Tejedoras de Elite, in Flores, I. (ed.) Tejedoras Wari en Pucllana, una Tumba de Élite: 286442. Lima: Ministerio de Cultura & Municipalidad de Miraflores.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. 1978. Ethnicity: problem and focus in anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 7: 379403. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.07.100178.002115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, A.K. & Shimada, I.. 1986. El Niño flood deposits at Batán Grande, Northern Peru. Geoarchaeology 1: 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.3340010104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnan, C.B. & Donnan, S.. 1997. Moche textiles from Pacatnamu, in Donnan, C. & Cock, G. (ed.) Pacatnamu papers, volume 2: the Moche occupation: 215–42. Los Angeles (CA): The Fowler Museum of Cultural History.Google Scholar
Donnan, C.B. & Mackey, C.J.. 1978. Ancient burial patterns of the Moche Valley, Peru. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Dulanto, J. 2008. Between horizons: diverse configurations of society and power in the late pre-Hispanic Andes, in Silverman, H. & Isbell, W.H. (ed.) Handbook of South American archaeology: 761–83. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, A. 2008. Notas sobre el testigo No. 3, Tumba 18, Plataforma Superior, Huaca de la Luna, in Uceda, S., Mujica, E. & Morales, R. (ed.) Investigaciones en la Huaca de la Luna 2001: 261–67. Trujillo: Patronato Huacas del Valle de Moche and Universidad Nacional de Trujillo.Google Scholar
Gayoso, H. 2007. Tejiendo el Poder: los especialistas textiles de Huacas del Sol y de la Luna. Unpublished Masters dissertation, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla.Google Scholar
Hales, S. & Hodas, T.. 2010. Material culture and social identities in the ancient world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, J.M. 2000. Ethnic identity in Greek antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heggarty, P. & Beresford Jones, D.G.. 2012. Archaeology and language in the Andes: a cross-disciplinary exploration of prehistory (Publications of the British Academy 173). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, A.G. 2020. SHCal20 Southern Hemisphere calibration, 0–55,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 62: 759–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornborg, A. & Hill, J.D.. 2011. Introduction: ethnicity in ancient Amazonia, in Hornborg, A. & Hill, J.D. (ed.) Ethnicity in ancient Amazonia: reconstructing past identities from archaeology, linguistics and ethnohistory: 128. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. 2010. Beyond Wari walls. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Jones, S. 1997. The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laszczka, A. & Prządka-Giersz, P.. 2020. Tapestry-woven textiles from Castillo de Huarmey, Peru and the Wari-Huarmey textile tradition. Estudios Latinoamericanos 40: 141–57. https://doi.org/10.36447/Estudios2020.v40.art5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, G.F. 2012. Ancient alterity in the Andes: a recognition of others. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, C. 2009. Chimu statecraft in the provinces, in Marcus, J. & Williams, P.R. (ed.) Andean civilization: a tribute to Michael E. Moseley: 325–49. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzel, D. 1964. Style and time in the Middle Horizon. Ñawpa Pacha 2: 1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzel, D. 1977. The archaeology of ancient Peru and the work of Max Uhle. Berkeley: R. H. Lowie Museum of Anthropology, University of California.Google Scholar
Morales, R. & Rengifo, C.. (ed.) 2021. Investigaciones en la Huaca de la Luna 2018–2019. Trujillo: Universidad Nacional de Trujillo & Patronato Huacas del Valle de Moche.Google Scholar
Moseley, M. 1983. The good old days were better: agrarian collapse and tectonics. American Anthropologist 85: 773–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, M. & Deeds, E.. 1982. The land in front of Chan Chan: agrarian expansion, reform, and collapse in the Moche Valley, in Moseley, M. & Day, K.C. (ed.) Chan Chan: Andean desert city: 2553. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Murra, J. 1962. Cloth and its function in the Inka state. American Anthropologist 64: 710–28. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1962.64.4.02a00020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakland, A. 2020. Max Uhle's field notes and textile collections from Chimu Capac, Supe Valley, Peru: style and cultural affiliation during the early and late Middle Horizon. Ñawpa Pacha 40: 175222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00776297.2020.1794326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakland, A. 2022. Wari and the Huaca del Sol, Max Uhle's 1899 textile collection at Moche, Perú, in Farmer, J. & Koontz, R. (ed.) Making ‘meaning’: precolumbian archaeology, art history, and the legacy of Terence Grieder. Houston (TX): University of Houston Libraries. https://doi.org/10.52713/QDMZ4161Google Scholar
Oakland Rodman, A. 1992. Textiles and ethnicity: Tiwanaku in San Pedro de Atacama, north Chile. Latin American Antiquity 3: 316–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/971952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neale, L. 1946. Mochica (early Chimú) and other Peruvian twill fabrics. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 2: 269–94. https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.2.3.3628718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neale, L. & Kroeber, A.. 1930. Textile periods in ancient Peru. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 28: 2356.Google Scholar
Pariona, L. 2022. El estudio de los textiles del Horizonte Medio en Huaca del Sol. Trujillo: Universidad Nacional de Trujillo.Google Scholar
Phipps, E. 2010. Cochineal red, the art history of a color. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 67(3): 148.Google Scholar
Prümers, H. 1990. Der fundort “El Castillo” in Huarmeytal, Peru. Ein Beitrag zum Problem des Moche-Huari Textilstils (Mundus Reihe Alt-Amerikanistik 4). Bonn: Holos.Google Scholar
Prümers, H. 2001. “El Castillo” de Huarmey: una plataforma funeria del horizonte medio. Boletín de Arqueologia PUCP 4: 289312. https://doi.org/10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.200001.010Google Scholar
Prümers, H. 2007. Los textiles de la tumba del “Señor de Sipan”. Zeitschrift fur Archaologie AuBereuropaischer Kulturen 2: 255324.Google Scholar
Quilter, J. & Castillo, L.J.. (ed.) 2010. New perspectives on Moche political organization. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.Google Scholar
Quilter, J. & Koons, M.. 2012. The fall of the Moche: a critique of claims for South America's first state. Latin American Antiquity 23: 127–43. https://doi.org/10.7183/1045-6635.23.2.127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, A.P. 1977. Warp-patterned weaves of the Andes. Washington, D.C.: The Textile Museum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rengifo, C., Gayoso, H., & Castillo, F.. 2022. Huacas de Moche: Dos mil años de ocupación prehispánica desde una perspectiva arqueológica. Estudios Atacameños 68: e5000. https://doi.org/10.22199/issn.0718-1043-2022-0025Google Scholar
Sandweiss, D.H. & Quilter, J.. (ed.) 2008. El Niño, catastrophism, and culture change in ancient America. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Library and Collection.Google Scholar
Scullin, D. & Boyd, B.. 2014. Whistles in the wind: the noisy Moche city. World Archaeology 46: 362–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2014.921099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimada, I. 1995. Cultura Sicán: dios, riqueza y poder en la costa norte del Perú. Lima: Banco Continental.Google Scholar
Sun, Yan. 2021. Many worlds under one heaven: material culture, identity, and power in the northern frontiers of the Western Zhou, 1045–771 BCE. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surette, F. 2015. Virú and Moche textiles on the north coast of Peru during the Early Intermediate period: material culture, domestic traditions and elite fashions. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Western University, Ontario.Google Scholar
Szpak, P., Millaire, J-F., White, C.D., Lau, G., Surette, F. & Longstaffe, F.J.. 2015. Origins of prehispanic camelid wool textiles from the north and central coasts of Peru traced by carbon and nitrogen isotopic analyses. Current Anthropology 56: 449–59. https://doi.org/10.1086/680873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szpak, P., Millaire, J-F., White, C.D., Donnan, C. & Longstaffe, F.J.. 2018. Stable isotope sourcing of wool from textiles at Pacatnamú. Archaeometry 60: 612–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szpak, P., Millaire, J-F., Chapdelaine, C., White, C.D. & Longstaffe, F.J.. 2019. An integrated isotopic study of Early Intermediate Period camelid husbandry in the Santa Valley, Perú. Environmental Archaeology 25: 279–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2019.1583302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thays, C. & Cornejo, M.. 2021. Análisis de los materiales textiles recuperados del Montículo 6, in Cornejo, M.A. (ed.) Complejo arqueológico Catalina Huanca, Monticulo 6, continuidades y rupturas del horizonte medio en la costa central: 299389. Lima: Ediciones Rafael Valdez.Google Scholar
Tsai, H. 2019. The “Coastal Cajamarca” style did not come from the coast. Ñawpa Pacha 39(1): 121–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00776297.2019.1581452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufinio, M., Chávarri, H., Vega, R. & Gamboa, P.. 2013. Excavaciones en la Sección 2 de Huaca del Sol, in Uceda, S. & Morales, R. (ed.) Informe Técnico 2012 del Proyecto Arqueológico Huaca de la Luna: 177260. Trujillo: Universidad Nacional de Trujillo.Google Scholar
Tufinio, M., Tufinio, H. Chavarri, P. Gamboa, V. Velásquez, . 2014. Excavaciones en la Sección 4 de Huaca del Sol, in Uceda, S. & Morales, R. (ed.) Informe Técnico 2013 del Proyecto Arqueológico Huaca de la Luna: 87170. Trujillo: Universidad Nacional de Trujillo.Google Scholar
Uceda, S., Morales, R. & Mujica, E.. 2016. Huaca de la Luna: templo y dioses Moches/Moche temples and gods. New York: World Monuments Fund.Google Scholar
Uceda, S., Gayoso, H., Castillo, F. & Rengifo, C.. 2021. Climate and social changes: reviewing the equation with data from the Huacas de Moche archaeological complex, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 32: 705–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/laq.2021.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhle, M. 1913. Die Ruinen von Moche. Société des Américanistes de Paris 10: 95117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urban, M. 2019. Lost languages of the Peruvian north coast (Estudios Indiana 12). Berlin: Mann.Google Scholar
Wester, C. 2021. Ñaimlap: memoria Lambayeque y materialidad histórica/Lambayeque: memory and historical materiality. Callao: Comunica-2.Google Scholar
Young-Sanchez, M. 2000. Textiles from Peru's central coast 750–1000: the Reiss and Stübel collections from Ancon. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Zavaleta, E., Cruz, G., Lázaro, D., Pariona, L. & Vilca, Y.J.. 2021. Identificación y análisis de contextos funerarios del Horizonte Medio en Huacas de Moche, in Morales, R. & Rengifo, C. (ed.) Investigaciones en la Huaca de la Luna 2018–2019: 89130. Trujillo: Universidad Nacional de Trujillo and Patronato Huacas del Valle de Moche.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of Peru showing the location of sites mentioned in the text: red dots indicate modern towns; green dots indicate archaeological sites (figure by authors).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Huacas de Moche site plan (figure by Huacas de Moche Archaeological Project).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Huaca del Sol with urban zone remains in the foreground (photograph by authors).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Left) aerial view of Huaca del Sol annotated with Sections 1–4 and excavation units in Section 4; right) detail of level 2 features in the western portion of excavation unit 1 (figure by authors).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Textiles incorporating Moche and Wari images: a) crab man; b) snake belt man; c) Wari staff-bearing figures (figure by authors).

Figure 5

Figure 6. δ13C and δ15N values of camelid hair from the Huaca del Sol textiles compared with fibres of highland (Chancay Valley) and coastal (Pacatnamu) origins (figure by authors).

Figure 6

Table 1. Calibrations of 20 AMS dates. Columns refer to: style/culture of the textile, reference number for this article, laboratory number, and standard deviation of the uncalibrated date. The rest of the columns refer to the percentage probabilities from high to low of the dates falling into the time ranges in the adjacent column.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Calibrations of 20 AMS dates. R Date codes include the textile number and the excavation context as presented in the OSM and Figure 4 (figure by authors).

Supplementary material: File

Quilter et al. supplementary material 1

Quilter et al. supplementary material
Download Quilter et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 88.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Quilter et al. supplementary material 2

Quilter et al. supplementary material
Download Quilter et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 798.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Quilter et al. supplementary material 3

Quilter et al. supplementary material
Download Quilter et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 21.1 KB