Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:11:31.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conditions for permanence in well-known biological competition models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Jan H. van Vuuren
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag XI, 7602 Matieland, South Africa; email: vuuren@ing.sun.ac.za
John Norbury
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, 24–29 St Giles', OX1 3LB, United Kingdom; email: ecmigb@vax.ox.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Reaction-diffusion systems are widely used to model the population densities of biological species competing for natural resources in their common habitat. It is often not too difficult to establish positive uniform upper bounds on solution components of such systems, but the task of establishing strictly positive uniform lower bounds (when they exist) can be quite troublesome. Two previously established criteria for the permanence (non-extinction and non-explosion) of solutions of general weakly-coupled competition-diffusion systems with diagonally convex reaction terms are used here as background to develop more easily verifiable and concrete conditions for permanence in various well-known competition diffusion models. These models include multi-component reaction-diffusion systems with (i) the by now classical Lotka-Volterra (logistic) reaction terms, (ii) higher order “logistic” interaction between the species, (iii) logistic-logarithmic reaction terms, (iv) Ayala-Gilpin-Ehrenfeld θ-interaction terms (which are used to model Drosophila competition), (v) logistic-exponential interaction between the species, (vi) Schoener-exploitation and (vii) modified Schoener-interference between the species. In (i) a known condition for permanence (for the ODE-system) is recovered, while in (ii)–(vii) new criteria for permanence are established.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2000

References

[1]Ahmad, S. and Lazer, A. C., “Asymptotic behaviour of solutions of periodic competition diffusion systems”, Nonlinear Analysis TMA 13 (1989) 263284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Alvarez, C. and Lazer, A. C., “An application of topological degree to the periodic competing species problem”, J. Austral. Math. Soc.Ser. B 28 (1986) 202219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Ayala, F. J., Gilpin, M. E. and Ehrenfeld, J. G., “Competition between species: theoretical models and experimental tests”, Theoretical Population Biology 4 (1973) 331356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[4]Burton, T. A. and Hutson, V., “Permanence for non-autonomous predator-prey systems”, Differential and Integral Equations 4 (1991) 12691280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Chen, N. and Lu, Z. Y., “Global stability of periodic solutions to reaction-diffusion systems”, Mathematica Applicata 4 (1991) 111114.Google Scholar
[6]Cosner, C. and Lazer, A. C., “Stable coexistence states in the Lotka-Volterra competition model with diffusion”, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 44 (1984) 11121132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]de Mottoni, P. and Schiaffino, A., “Competition systems with periodic coefficients: a geometrical approach”, J. Math. Biology 11 (1981) 319335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Fernands, M. L. C. and Zanolin, F., “Repelling conditions for boundary sets using Liapunov-like functions. II: Persistence and periodic solutions”, J. Diff. Eqns 86 (1990) 3358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Fonda, A., “Uniformly persistent semi-dynamical systems”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 104 (1988) 111116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Gilpin, M. E. and Ayala, F. J., “Global models of growth and competition”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 70 (1973) 35903593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[11]Gilpin, M. E. and Ayala, F. J., “Schoener's models and Drosophila competition”, Theoretical Population Biology 9 (1974) 1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Gopalsamy, K., “Global stability in a periodic Lotka-Volterra system”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 27 (1985) 6672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Hale, J. K. and Waltman, P., “Persistence in infinite-dimensional systems”, SIAM J. Math. Analysis 20 (1989)388395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Hess, P., Periodic-parabolic boundary value problems and positivity. Pitman Research Notes in Math. 247 (Longman, Essex, 1991).Google Scholar
[15]Kirlinger, G., “Permanence of some ecological systems with several predator and one prey species”, J. Math. Biology 26 (1988) 217232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Pao, C. V., “Coexistence and stability of a competition-diffusion system in population dynamics”, J. Math. Analysis Appl. 83 (1981) 5476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Schoener, T. W., “Population growth regulated by intra-specific competition for energy or time: some simple representations”, Theoretical Population Biology 4 (1973) 5684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[18]Schoener, T. W., “Competition and the form of habitat shift”, Theoretical Population Biology 6 (1974)265307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[19]Schoener, T. W., “Alternatives to Lotka-Volterra competition: models of intermediate complexity”, Theoretical Population Biology 10 (1976) 309333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[20]Tineo, A. and Alvarez, C., “A different consideration about the globally asymptotically stable solution of the periodic n -species problem”, J. Math. Analysis Appl. 159 (1991) 4450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]van Vuuren, J. H. and Norbury, J., “Permanence and asymptotic stability in diagonally convex reaction-diffusion systems”, Proc. Royal Soc. of Edinburgh, Ser A (Math.), 128A (1998) 147172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Zanolin, F., “Permanence and positive periodic solutions for Kolmogorov competing species systems”, Results in Math. 21 (1992) 224250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Zuao, X. Q. and Sleeman, B. D., “Permanence in Kolmogorov competition models with diffusion”, IMA J. Appl. Math. 15 (1993) 111.Google Scholar