Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:34:38.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minimisation problems for implicit functionals defined by differential equations of liver kinetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

L. Bass ,
A. J. Bracken  and
R. Vyborny
R. Vyborny
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4067, Queensland.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A substance carried convectively through the liver by the blood undergoes two successive enzymatic transformations. The resulting concentrations of the three forms of the substance are determined, as functions of position along the blood flow in the steady state, by coupled ordinary differential equations of the first order on a finite interval. The densities along the blood flow of the activities of the two (immobile) transforming enzymes are described by two non-negative and normalised functions of position.

The problem, suggested by recent experimental results, is to choose these two functions so as to minimise the concentration of the once-transformed (intermediate) form of the substance at one boundary (the liver outlet). That minimisation is particularly significant biologically when the intermediate form is toxic and the second transformation renders it harmless. In this problem of optimal control (exerted perhaps by natural selection), the classical approach through Euler's equations is inapplicable because of the constraints on the two density functions. Moreover, when the enzyme kinetics and hence the differential equations are non-linear, the functional to be minimised is not obtainable explicitly. Instead it appears, after some manipulation of the coupled equations, as the terminal boundary value of the solution of a non-linear Volterra integral equation, which involves the two density functions (one explicitly and one implicitly) as control variables.

Appropriate existence, uniqueness and boundedness results are obtained for the solution of this integral equation, and the problem is then solved rigorously for one class of non-linearities (including saturation kinetics). Some unanswered questions are posed for another class (including substrate-inhibition kinetics).

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , April 1984 , pp. 538 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1984

References

[1]Bass, L., Robinson, P. J. and Bracken, A. J., “Hepatic elimination of fllowing substrates: the distributed model”, J. Theoret. Biol. 72 (1978), 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bass, L., “On the location of cellular functions in perfused organs”, J. Theoret. Biol. 82 (1980), 347–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[3]Bass, L., “Functional zones in rat liver; the degree of overlap”, J. Theoret. Biol. 89 (1981), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[4]Bass, L., “Functional zones in the liver”, Gastroenterology 81 (1981), 976–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[5]Bracken, A. J. and Bass, L., “Statistical mechanics of hepatic elimination”, Math. Biosci. 44 (1979), 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Coddington, E. A. and Levinson, N., Theory of ordinary differential equations (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955), 43.Google Scholar
[7]Dixon, M. and Webb, E. C., Enzymes (Longmans, London, 3rd edition, 1979).Google Scholar
[8]Gumucio, J. J. and Miller, D. L., “Functional implicaticn of liver cell heterogeneity”, Gastroenterology 80 (1981), 393–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[9]Hille, E., Lectures on differential equations (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1969), 19.Google Scholar
[10]Pang, K. S. and Gillette, J. R., “Kinetics of metabolite formation and elimination in the perfused rat liver preparation”, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 207 (1978), 178–194.Google ScholarPubMed
[11]Weyl, H., Philosophy of mathematics and natural science (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1949), Chapter 3.Google Scholar