Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:50:21.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the existence and sensitivity analysis of optimal catital accumulation paths in continuous time, infinite horizon models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

E. Flytzanis  and
Nikolaos S. Papageorgiou
E. Flytzanis
Affiliation:
Athens School of Economics –34, Greece.
Nikolaos S. Papageorgiou
Affiliation:
University of California, Department of Mathematics, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we consider an infinite horizon, continuous time model of economic growth. We prove two theorems; one on the existence of optimal paths of capital accumulation and the other on the dependence of the set of optimal paths on the initial capital stock (sensitivity analysis). In the existence result the underlying technology set is nonconvex and only its “investment’ slices are convex. The proof is direct, without any use of necessary conditions. In the sensitivity analysis, the technology set is convex and so we have that the value function is concave. Then having that, we show that the set of optimal paths is an upper semicaontinuous multifunction of the initial capital stock.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , April 1989 , pp. 450 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1989

References

[1]Arrow, K. and Kurz, M., Public investment, the rate of return and optimal fiscal policy (The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1970).Google Scholar
[2]Ash, R., Real analysis and probability (Academic Press, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
[3]Balder, E., “Lower closure for orientor fields by lower semicontinuity of outer integral functionals”, Annali di Mat. Pura ed Applicata 139 (1985) 349–360.Google Scholar
[4]Benveniste, L. M. and Sheinkman, J., “Duality theory for dynamic optimization models in economics: The continuous time case”, J. Econ. Theory 27 (1982) 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Brock, W., “Sensitivity of optimal growth with respect to a change in target stocks”, in Contributions to the Von-Neumann growth model (eds. Bruckmann, G. and Weber, W.) (Springer, Berlin 1971).Google Scholar
[6]Cass, D. and Shell, K., “The structure and stability of competitive dynamical systems”, J. Econ. Theory 12 (1976) 31–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Cesari, L., “Closure, lower closure and seminormality theorems in optimal control”, SIAM J. Control 9 (1971) 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Gaines, R. and Peterson, J., “The existence of optimal consumption policies in optimal economic growth models with nonconvex technologies”, J. Econ. Theory 37 (1985) 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Haurie, A., “Optimal control on an infinite time horizon: The turnpike approach”, J. Math. Econ. 3 (1976) 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Klein, E. and Thompson, A., Theory of correspondences (Wiley, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
[11]Ma, T. A., “Topological degree of set valued compact fields in locally convex spaces”, Dissertationes Math. 92 (1972) 1–47.Google Scholar
[12]Mirrelees, J. A., “Optimum growth when technology is changing”, Review of Economic Studies 34 (1967) 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Papageorgiou, N. S., “Convergence theorems for Banach space valued integrable multi-functions”, Intern. J. Math. and Math. Sci. 10 (1987) 433–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Ramsey, F. P., “A mathematical theory of saving”, The Economic Journal 38 (1928) 542–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Rockafellar, R. T., “Conjugate convex functions in optimal control and the calculus of variations”, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 32 (1970) 174–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Rockafellar, R. T., Convex Analysis (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Takekuma, S. I., “A sensitivity analysis on optimal economic growth”, J. Math. Econ. 7 (1980) 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar