Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:28:53.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the generalized complementarity problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Jen-Chih Yao
Affiliation:
Dept of Appl. Mathematics, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan80424, R.O.C.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper, the generalised complementarity problem studied by Parida and Sen [13] is further extended. The extended problem appears to be more general and unifying. Characterisations of solutions to this extended problem are given. Some existence results derived by these characterisations are presented. An application of the extended problem to the quasi-variational inequalities of obstacle type is considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1994

References

[1]Berge, C., Topological Spaces (Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh/London, 1963).Google Scholar
[2]Chan, D. and Pang, J. S., “The generalized quasi-variational inequality problem”, Math. Oper. Res. 7 (1982) 211222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cottle, R. W., “Nonlinear programs with positively bounded Jacobians”, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 14 (1966) 147158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Cottle, R. W., “Complementary and variational problems”, Sympos. Math. 19 (1976) 177208.Google Scholar
[5]Cottle, R. W. and Dantzig, G. B., “Complementary pivot theory of mathematical programming”, Linear Algebra Appl. 1 (1968) 103125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Habetler, G. J. and Price, A. J., “Existence theory for generalized nonlinear complementarity problems”, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 7 (1971) 229239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Harker, P. T. and Pang, J. S., “Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: A survey of theory, algorithms and applications”, Math. Programming 48 (1990) 161220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Hogan, W. W., “Point-to-set maps in mathematical programming”, SIAM Rev. 15 (1973) 591603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Karamardian, S., “Generalized complementarity problems”, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 3 (1971) 161168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Karamardian, S., “Complementarity problems over cones with monotone and pseudomonotone maps”, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 18 (1976) 445454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Noor, M. A. and Zarae, S., “Linear quasi complementarity problems”, Utilitas Math. 27 (1985) 249260.Google Scholar
[12]Parida, J. and Sen, A., “Duality and existence theory for nondifferentiable programming”, J. Optim. Theory Appl. 48 (1986) 451458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Parida, J. and Sen, A., “A variational-like inequality for multifunctions with applications”, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 124 (1987) 7381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Saigal, R., “Extension of the generalized complementarity problem”, Math. Oper. Res. 1 (1976) 260266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Schechter, M., “A subgradient duality theorem”, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 61 (1977) 850855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar