Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:52:07.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential effects of internal and external factors in early bilingual vocabulary learning: The case of Singapore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2017

HE SUN ,
BIN YIN ,
NUR FARINA BEGUM BINTE AMSAH  and
BETH ANN O'BRIEN
HE SUN*
Affiliation:
Nanyang Technological University
BIN YIN
Affiliation:
Nanyang Technological University
NUR FARINA BEGUM BINTE AMSAH
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
BETH ANN O'BRIEN
Affiliation:
Nanyang Technological University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE He Sun, the Education and Cognitive Development Lab, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, NIE5-B3-13, 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore 637616, Singapore. E-mail: he.sun@nie.edu.sg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both internal factors (e.g., nonverbal intelligence) and external factors (e.g., input quantity) are claimed to affect the rate of children's vocabulary development. However, it remains an open question whether these variables work similarly on bilingual children's dual language learning. The current paper examined this issue on 805 Singapore children (4 years, 1 month to 5 years, 8 months) who are learning English (societal language) and an ethnic language (Mandarin/Malay/Tamil). Singapore is a bilingual society; however, there is an inclination for English use at home in recent years, resulting in a discrepancy of input between English and ethnic languages in many families. In this study, internal and external factors were examined comprehensively with standardized tests and a parental questionnaire. Regression analysis was used to address the questions. There were statistically significant differences in language input quantity, quality, and output between English and ethnic language learning environments. Singapore children are learning English in an input-rich setting while learning their ethnic language in a comparatively input-poor setting. Multiple regressions revealed that while both sets of factors explained lexical knowledge in each language, the relative contribution is different for English and ethnic languages: internal factors explained more variance in English language vocabulary, whereas external factors were more important in explaining ethnic language knowledge. We attribute this difference to a threshold effect of external factors based on the critical mass hypothesis and call for special attention to learning context (input-rich vs. input-poor settings) for specific bilingual language studies.

Keywords

bilingual receptive vocabulary knowledgeexternal variablesinput-poor settinginput-rich settinginternal variables
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , March 2018 , pp. 383 - 411
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexiou, T. (2009). Young learners’ cognitive skills and their role in foreign language vocabulary learning. In Nikolov, M. (Ed.), Early learning of modern foreign languages: Processes and outcomes (pp. 46–61). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Allman, B. (2005). Vocabulary size and accuracy of monolingual and bilingual preschool children. In Cohen, J., McAlister, K. T., Rolstad, K., & MacSwan, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism (pp. 58–77). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, D. J., Goldfield, B. A., & Reznik, J. S. (2002). Alternative approaches to analyzing individual differences in the rate of early vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Summers, C. L., Boerger, K. M., Resendiz, M. D., Greene, K. A. I., . . . Gillam, R. B. (2012). The measure matters: Language dominance profiles across measures in Spanish–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 616–629. doi:10.1017/S1366728912000090 Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49.Google Scholar
Bohman, T. M., Bedore, L. M., Pena, E. D., Mendez-Perez, A., & Gillam, R. B. (2010). What you hear and what you say: Language performance in Spanish-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 325–344. doi:10.1080/13670050903342019 Google Scholar
Bokhorst-Heng, W. D. (1999). Bilingual education and the dialectics of national integration. In Alatis, J. E. & Tan, A.-H. (Eds.), Proceedings of Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics (pp. 356–370). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C.-S., & Haynes, O. M. (2004). Specific and general language performance across early childhood: Stability and gender considerations. First Language, 24, 267–303.Google Scholar
Bouchard, C., Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Boudreault, M.-C., & Deneault, J. (2009). Gender differences in language development in French Canadian children between 8 and 30 months of age. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 685–707. doi:10.1017/S0142716409990075 Google Scholar
Bull, R., Lee, K., Karuppiah, N., Poon, K., O'Brien's, B., Towndrow, P., & Bautista, A. (2014). Preschool impact upon child outcomes: A longitudinal study of transition from preschool to primary. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University, National Institute of Education Office of Educational Research Education Research Funding Programme.Google Scholar
Burgess, S., Hecht, S., & Lonigan, C. (2002). Relations of the home literacy environment (HLE) to the development of reading-related abilities: A one-year longitudinal study. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 408–426.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. (2002). Modern Language Aptitude Test: Manual—2002 Edition. Bethesda, MD: Second Language Testing.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (2003). First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2011). Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, morphology and complete syntax in successive bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 223–248.Google Scholar
Collentine, J., & Freed, B. (2004). Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition: Introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 597–650.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic Interdependence and the Educational Development of Bilingual Children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 222–251.Google Scholar
Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (1986). Bilingual education: Aspects of theory, research and practice. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. (2012). Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 219–253.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. (2016). Cognitive linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics, 27, 479–491. doi:10.1515/cog-2016-0059 Google Scholar
Daller, M., & Ongun, Z. (2017). The threshold hypothesis revisited: Bilingual lexical knowledge and non-verbal IQ development. International Journal of Bilingualism. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
Dixon, L. Q., Wu, S., & Daraghmeh, A. (2012). Profiles in bilingualism: Factors influencing kindergartners’ language proficiency. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40, 25–34. doi:10.1007/s10643-011-0491-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, L. Q., Zhao, J., Quiroz, B. G., & Shin, J. (2012). Home and community factors influencing bilingual children's ethnic language vocabulary development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16, 541–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focussed instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223–236.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. (2003). Generalization from sparse input. In Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Eriksson, M., Marschik, P. B., Tulviste, T., Almgren, M., Pérez, P. M., Wehberg, S., & Gallego, C. (2012). Differences between girls and boys in emerging language skills: Evidence from 10 language communities. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 326–343. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02042 Google Scholar
Farver, J. M., Xu, Y., Eppe, S., & Lonigan, C. J. (2006). Home environments and young Latino children's school readiness. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 196–212.Google Scholar
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
French, L. M., & O'Brien, I. (2008). Phonological memory and children's second language grammar learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 463–487. doi:10.1017/S0142716408080211 Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 200–213.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., & Hoff, E. (2007). Input and the acquisition of language: Three questions. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M. (Eds.), The handbook of language development (pp. 107–127). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gillon, G. (2004). Phonological awareness: From research to practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, H., Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2008). Lexical acquisition over time in minority first language children learning English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 41–65. doi:10.1017/S014271640808003 Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., & Kreiter, J. (2003). Understanding child bilingual acquisition using parent and teacher reports. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 267–288. doi:10.1017/S0142716403000158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K., & Diaz, R. M. (1985). The relationship between degree of bilingualism and cognitive ability: A critical discussion and some new longitudinal data. Children's Language, 5, 319–344.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M., & Lyons, T. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology, 27, 236–248.Google Scholar
Ibbotson, P. (2013). The scope of usage-based theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 255. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00255 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juffs, A. (2004). Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 199–225. doi:10.1111/j.0079-1636.2004.00135 Google Scholar
Knell, E., Qiang, H. Y., Pei, M., Chi, Y. P., Siegel, L. S., Zhao, L., & Zhao, W (2007). Early English immersion and literacy in Xi'an, China. Modern Language Journal, 91, 395–417.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. E., & Taylor, D. M. (1996). Language in the lives of ethnic minorities: Cuban-American families in Miami. Applied Linguistics, 17, 477–500.Google Scholar
Lim, V. P., Lincoln, M., Chan, Y. H., & Onslow, M. (2008). Stuttering in English-Mandarin bilingual speakers: The influence of language dominance on stuttering severity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1522–1537. doi:1092-4388/08/5106-1522 Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21, 339–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 940–967. doi:1092-4388/07/5004-0940 Google Scholar
Meara, P. (1997). Towards a new approach to modelling vocabulary acquisition. In Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 109–121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Metsala, J. L., & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In Metsala, J. L. & Ehri, L. C. (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning reading (pp. 89–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Reexamining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2008). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 29, 578–596.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
O'Grady, W. (2008). The emergentist program. Lingua, 118, 447–464.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. E. (2002). Language and literacy in bilingual children. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pakir, A. (1999). Bilingual education with English as an official language: Socio-cultural implications. In Alatis, J. E. & Tan, A.-H. (Eds.), Georgetown roundtable of linguistics archive (pp. 341–349). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2007). Second language acquisition in childhood. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M. (Eds.), Handbook of language development (pp. 387–406). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child internal and child external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 213–237.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z. (2007). Social factors in childhood bilingualism in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 399–410.Google Scholar
Phillips, B. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2009). Variations in the home literacy environment of preschool children: A cluster analytic approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 146–174. doi:10.1080/10888430902769533 Google Scholar
Pi-Yu, C., & Rvachew, S. (2007). English-French bilingual children's phonological awareness and vocabulary skills. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 292–307.Google Scholar
Pivik, R. T., Andres, A., & Badger, T. M. (2011). Diet and gender influences on processing and discrimination of speech sounds in 3- and 6-month-old infants: A developmental ERP study. Developmental Science, 14, 700–712. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01019 Google Scholar
Place, S., & Hoff, E. (2011). Properties of dual language exposure that influence 2-year-olds’ bilingual proficiency. Child Development, 82, 1834–1839. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01660 Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1995). Coloured Progressive Matrices manual. London: Lewis.Google Scholar
Rickard Liow, S. J., & Sze, W. P. (2009). Bilingual Language Assessment Battery (BLAB). Unpublished manuscript, National University of Singapore, Department of Psychology and Division of Graduate Medical Studies.Google Scholar
Rickard Liow, S. J., Sze, W. P, & Lee, L. C. (2013). Bilingual Language Assessment Battery (BLAB) manual. Singapore: National University of Singapore, Department of Psychology and Division of Graduate Medical Studies.Google Scholar
Rojas, R., Iglesias, A., Bunta, F., Goldstein, B., Goldenberg, C., & Reese, L. (2016). Interlocutor differential effects on the expressive language skills of Spanish-speaking English learners. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 166–177.Google Scholar
Saravanan, V. (2001). The significance of bilingual Chinese, Malay and Tamil children's English network patterns on community language use patterns. Early Child Development and Care, 166, 81–91.Google Scholar
Saravanan, V., Lakshmi, S., & Caleon, I. (2007). Attitudes towards literary Tamil and standard spoken Tamil in Singapore. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 58–79.Google Scholar
Scheele, A. F., Leseman, P. P. M., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). The home language environment of monolingual and bilingual children and their language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 117–140. doi:10.1017/S0142716409990191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sénéchal, M., LeFevre, J. A., Thomas, E. M., & Daley, K. E. (1998). Differential effects of home literacy experiences on the development of oral and written language. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 96–116. doi:10.1598/RRQ.33.1.5 Google Scholar
Singapore Department of Statistics. (2016). Population trends 2016. Singapore: Author.Google Scholar
Singleton, J. L., & Newport, E. L. (2004). When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from inconsistent input. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 370–407.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. (1997). Constructing and deconstructing the self: Comparing post-Vygotskian and discourse-based versions of social constructivism. Mind, Culture and Activity, 4, 160–173.Google Scholar
Sun, H., Steinkrauss, R., Tendeiro, J., & De Bot, K. (2016). Individual differences in very young children's English acquisition in China: Internal and external factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 550–566. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000243 Google Scholar
Sun, H., Steinkrauss, R., Wieling, M., & de Bot, K. (2016). Individual differences in very young Chinese children's English vocabulary breadth and semantic depth: Internal and external factors. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13670050.2016.1178706 Google Scholar
Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2009). When study-abroad experience fails to deliver: The internal resources threshold effect. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 79–99.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2007). The output hypothesis: Its history and its future. Beijing: Beijing Foreign Studies University.Google Scholar
Uchikoshi, Y. (2006). English vocabulary development in bilingual kindergarteners: What are the best predictors? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 33–49.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2013). Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 86–110. doi:10.1017/S1366728912000284 Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2016). Quantity and quality of language input in bilingual language development. In Nicoladis, E. & Montanari, S. (Eds.), Lifespan perspectives on bilingualism (pp. 136–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S., Hulk, A., & Marinis, T. (2011). Internal and external factors in child second language acqusition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 207–212.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S., Persson, L., Prins, T., & de Bot, K. (2015). An investigation of factors affecting early foreign language learning in the Netherlands. Applied Linguistics, 36, 527–548. doi:10.1093/applin/amt052 Google Scholar
Verhagen, V., & Mos, M. (2016). Stability of familiarity judgments: Individual variation and the invariant bigger picture . Cognitive Linguistics, 27, 307–344. doi:10.1515/cog-2015-0063 Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar