Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:19:00.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Memory for stories in language-impaired children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Carolyn M. Graybeal*
Affiliation:
Boston University
*
Carolyn M. Graybeal, Boston University, School of Education, Division of Reading and Language, 765 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215

Abstract

Memory for content, or gist recall, was studied in groups of normal and language-impaired children, matched on age and sex, using a story recall task. The children were pretested for their ability to comprehend individual sentences in the stories. Following a practice session, two test stories were read to each child and oral recall was requested immediately after each story. The content of the recall protocols was analyzed into propositions and scored for accuracy, organization, and temporal ordering. The results showed that the groups differed primarily in the amount of accurate recall, with the language-impaired group recalling considerably less than the normal group. It was concluded that language-impaired children do exhibit deficits in gist recall for material which is within their linguistic grasp.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berry, M.Language disorders of children. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969.Google Scholar
Bransford, J., Barclay, J., & Franks, J.Sentence memory: a constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3, 193209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J., & Franks, J.The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 1971, 2, 331350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. The development of memory: knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. In Reese, J. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 10, New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Brown, A., & Smiley, S.Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: a problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 1911, 48, 18.Google Scholar
Christie, D., & Schumacher, G.Developmental trends in the abstraction and recall of relevant vs. irrelevant thematic information from connected verbal material. Child Development, 1975, 46, 598602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L.Peabody picture vocabulary test. Minneapolis: American Guidance Service, 1965.Google Scholar
Glasser, A., & Zimmerman, I.Clinical interpretation of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1967.Google Scholar
Johnson, D., & Myklebust, H.Learning disabilities. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1967.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirk, S., McCarthy, J., & Kirk, W.Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities (Rev. ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Lee, L.Northwestern syntax screening test. Evanston, III.: Northwestern University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Mandler, J., & Johnson, N.Remembrance of things parsed: story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 1977, 9, 111151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, H.Spontaneous speaking vocabulary of children. Journal of Education, 1957, 140.Google Scholar
Poppen, R., Stark, J., Eisenson, J., Forrest, T., & Wertheim, G.Visual sequencing performance of aphasie children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1969, 12, 288300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, E. Investigations of the maturation of various facets of auditory perception in preschool children. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, 1959.Google Scholar
Stein, N., & Glenn, G. An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In Freedle, R. (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing. Hillsdale, N.J.: Ablex, 1979.Google Scholar
Tallal, P., & Piercy, M.Developmental aphasia: impaired rate of non-verbal processing as a function of sensory modality. Neuropsychologia, 1973, 11, 389398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D.Wechsler intelligence scale for children. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1949.Google Scholar
Wiig, E., & Semel, E.Language disabilities of school children and adolescents. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1976.Google Scholar