We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Martin Nystrand, with contributions by Margaret Himley and Anne Doyle. Orlando, FL: Academic, 1986. Pp. xii + 234.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
28 November 2008
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bissex, G. (1980). Gnys at wrk: A child learns to write and read. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Britton, J., Burgess, T., Martin, M., McLeod, A., & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities (pp. 11–18). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1980). Psychological processes in discourse production. Technical report no. 99. Boulder, CO: Institute of Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1981). Writing: The divorce of the author from the text. In Kroll, B. & Vann, R. (Eds.), Exploring speaking-writing relationships: Connections and contrasts. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar