Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:25:08.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of a measure of root awareness to account for reading performance in the Arabic language: A development and validation study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

SANA TIBI ,
JAMIE L. TOCK  and
JOHN R. KIRBY
SANA TIBI*
Affiliation:
Florida State University
JAMIE L. TOCK
Affiliation:
Florida State University
JOHN R. KIRBY
Affiliation:
Queen’s University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Sana Tibi, School of Communication Science and Disorders, Florida State University, 201 W. Bloxham Street, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1200. E-mail: sana.tibi@cci.fsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Morphological awareness (MA) is an important predictor of reading outcomes in different languages. The consonantal root is a salient feature of Arabic lexical structure and critical to MA. The goals of this study were to (a) develop a measure of root awareness (RA) as one dimension of MA in Arabic, and (b) validate the RA measure by predicting reading outcomes in an Arabic population. A set of RA items was administered to 194 Arabic-speaking third-grade children. A one-factor model was specified using confirmatory factor analysis to examine the model fit of the RA measure. A structural equation model was then developed to examine the relation between the RA measure and important reading outcome measures including word reading, reading fluency, and reading comprehension. The results of these analyses indicated good model fit, and the RA measure accounted for a substantial portion of the variance in the outcomes. The establishment of the RA measure is an important preliminary step to efficiently assessing MA in Arabic and could serve as an integral tool for studying reading development.

Keywords

morphologyreading comprehensionroot awarenessscale developmentword reading
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , March 2019 , pp. 303 - 322
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Rabia, S. (2002). Reading in a root-based-morphology language: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 299–309. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00177Google Scholar
Abu-Rabia, S. (2007). The role of morphology and short vowelization in reading Arabic among normal and dyslexic readers in Grades 3, 6, 9, and 12. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 89–106. doi:10.1007/s10936-006-9035-6Google Scholar
Abu-Rabia, S. (2012). The role of morphology and short vowelization in reading morphological complex words in Arabic: Evidence for the domination of the morpheme/root-based theory in reading Arabic. Creative Education, 3, 486–494. doi:10.4236/ce.2012.34074Google Scholar
Abu-Rabia, S., Shalhoub-Awwad, Y. (2004). Morphological structures in visual word recognition: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 321–336. doi:10.4236/ce.2012.34074Google Scholar
Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. S. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 423–442. doi:10.1023/a:1024237415143Google Scholar
Apel, K., Diehm, E., & Apel, L. (2013). Using multiple measures of morphological awareness to assess its relation to reading. Topics in Language Disorders, 33, 42–56. doi:10.1044/0161-1461Google Scholar
Bar-On, A., & Ravid, D. (2011). Morphological analysis in learning to read pseudowords in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 553–581. doi:10.1017/S014271641100021XGoogle Scholar
Belkhouche, B., Harmain, H., Al Najjar, L., Taha, H., & Tibi, S. (2010). Analysis of primary school Arabic language textbooks. Proceedings of the Arab Conference on Information Technology, 10. Retrieved from http://acit2k.org/ACIT/index.php/proceedings/acit-2010-proceedingsGoogle Scholar
Ben-Dror, I., Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1995). Semantic, phonologic, and morphologic skill in reading disabled and normal children: Evidence from perception and production of spoken Hebrew. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 876–893. doi:10.2307/748202Google Scholar
Berninger, V., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 141–163. doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6Google Scholar
Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17, 303–316.Google Scholar
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon Cognition, 81, 65–92. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00119-6Google Scholar
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2005). Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 207–260. doi:10.1080/01690960444000106Google Scholar
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2010). Aralex: A lexical database for Modern Standard Arabic. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 481–487. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.481Google Scholar
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2011). Productivity and priming: Morphemic decomposition in Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 624–652. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.521022Google Scholar
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2015). Structure, form, and meaning in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Arabic. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 955–992. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1048258Google Scholar
Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R. (2010). Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary journal, 23, 515–537. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9172-zGoogle Scholar
Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179. doi:10.3102/0034654309359353Google Scholar
Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2008). Morpheme-based reading aloud: Evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers. Cognition, 108, 243–262. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.010Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190. doi:10.1023/A:1008131926604Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 464–487. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 239–274.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Kearns, D. (2017). Learning to read morphologically complex words. In K. Cain, D. L. Compton, & R. K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 191–214). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexander, M. F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303–335. doi:10.1023/A:1008177205648Google Scholar
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.Google Scholar
Deacon, H., Benere, J., & Pasquarella, A. (2013). Reciprocal relationship: Children’s morphological awareness and their reading accuracy across Grades 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1113–1126. doi:10.1037/a0029474Google Scholar
Deacon, H., Kieffer, M., & LaRoche, A. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Evidence from mediation and longitudinal models. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 432–451. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.926907Google Scholar
Deacon, H. S., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological?” The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. doi:10.1017.S0124716404001117Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2008). A review of the evidence on morphological processing in dyslexics and poor readers: A strength or weakness? In G. Reid, A. Fawcett, F. Manis, & L. Siegel (Eds.), The Sage handbook of dyslexia (pp. 212–237). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. G. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4Google Scholar
Ehri, L. (2017). Orthographic mapping and literacy development revisited. In K. Cain, D. L. Compton, & R. K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 127–146). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 257–285. doi:10.1080/10888438.2012.689791Google Scholar
Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In D. Sorbom, R. Cudeck, & S. H. C. Du Toit (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future: A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: Structures, functions and varieties (Rev. ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. K., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300. doi:10.1080/10888430802132279Google Scholar
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in the English reading comprehension of native English, Spanish, Filipino, and Vietnamese speakers. Language Learning, 62, 1170–1204. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00722.xGoogle Scholar
Kirby, J. R., & Bowers, P. N. (2017). Morphological instruction and literacy: Binding phonological, orthographic, and semantic features of words. In K. Cain, D. L. Compton, & R. K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 437–462). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 389–410. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Layes, S., Lalonde, R., & Rebai, M. (2017). Study on morphological awareness and rapid automatized naming through word reading and comprehension in normal and disabled reading Arabic-speaking children. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33, 123–140. doi:10.1080/10573569.2015.1105763Google Scholar
Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2014). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on second language reading. Applied Linguistics, 36, 611–634. doi:10.1093/applin/amu007Google Scholar
Muse, A. E. (2005). The nature of morphological knowledge (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee).Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2008). Mplus (Version 5.1). [Computer software]. Los Angeles: Author.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp.145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pittas, E., & Nunes, T. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading and spelling in Greek: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1507–1527. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9503-6Google Scholar
Qasem, M., & Foote, R. (2010). Cross language lexical activation: A test of the revised hierarchical and morphological decomposition models in Arabic-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 111–140. doi:10.1017/S0272263109990271Google Scholar
Quemart, P., Casalis, S., & Cole, P. (2011). The role of form and meaning in the processing of written morphology: A priming study in French developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 478–496. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.008Google Scholar
Rahbari, N., & Sénéchal, M. (2010). Learning to read and spell in Persian: A cross-sectional study from Grades 1 to 4. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1514–1527. doi:10.1037/a0020377Google Scholar
Ramirez, G., Chen, X., Geva, E., & Kiefer, H. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 337–358. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9Google Scholar
Ravid, D., & Malenky, A. (2001). Awareness of linear and nonlinear morphology in Hebrew: A developmental study. First Language, 21, 25–56. doi:10.1177/014272370102106102Google Scholar
Ravid, D., & Schiff, R. (2006). Morphological processing in Hebrew-speaking students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 220–229. doi:10.1177/0022219412449425Google Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2017). MAWRID: A model of Arabic word reading in development. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022219417720460Google Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Taha, H. (2017). The role of morphological and phonological awareness in the early development of word spelling and reading in typically developing and disabled Arabic readers. Dyslexia, 23, 345–371. doi:10.1002/dys.1572Google Scholar
Schiff, R., Cohen, M., Ben-Artzi, E., Sasson, A., & Ravid, D. (2016). Auditory morphological knowledge among children with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 140–154. doi:10.1080/10888438.2015.1094074Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2007). Morphological analogies in Hebrew-speaking university students with dyslexia compared with typically developing grade schoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 237–253. doi:10.1007/s10936-006-9043-6Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2018). Development and relationships between phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and word reading in spoken and Standard Arabic. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–13.Google Scholar
Shalhoub-Awwad, Y., & Leikin, M. (2016). The lexical status of the root in processing morphologically complex words in Arabic. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 296–310. doi:10.1080/10888438.2016.1180525Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 294–305. doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2481Google Scholar
Spencer, M., Muse, A., Wagner, R. K., Foorman, B., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Tighe, E. L., & Bishop, M. D. (2015). Examining the underlying dimensions of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 959–988. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9557-0Google Scholar
Taha, H., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2017). Morphology and spelling in Arabic: Development and interface. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 46, 27–38. doi:10.1017/S0142716417000029Google Scholar
Tibi, S. (2016). Cognitive and linguistic factors in reading Arabic: The role of morphological awareness in reading (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Canada).Google Scholar
Tibi, S., & Kirby, R. J. (2017). Morphological awareness: Construct and predictive validity in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 1019–1043. doi:10.1017/S0142716417000029Google Scholar
Tibi, S., & Kirby, J. R. (2018a). Investigating phonological awareness and naming speed as predictors of reading in Arabic. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22, 70–84. doi:10.1080/10888438.2017.1340948Google Scholar
Tibi, S., & Kirby, J. R. (2018b). Morphology and reading in Arabic. In A. Chekayri (Ed.), Teaching reading in Arabic: New approaches (pp. 91–111). Ifran: Morocco [Arabic].Google Scholar
Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2015). Exploring the dimensionality of morphological awareness and its relations to vocabulary knowledge in adult basic education. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 293–311. doi:10.1002/rrq.102Google Scholar
Tong, X., McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., & Wong, A. M.-Y. (2009). Morphological awareness, orthographic knowledge, and spelling errors: Keys to understanding early Chinese literacy acquisition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 426–452. doi:10.1037/a0026445Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286. doi:10.1177/002221949402700503Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161–195.Google Scholar
Wagner, R., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
Wolter, J. A., Wood, A., & D’zatko, K. W. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 286–298. doi:10.1044/0161-1461Google Scholar
Wu, X., Anderson, R. C., Li, W., Wu, X., Li, H., Zhang, J., … Gaffney, J. S. (2009). Morphological awareness and Chinese children’s literacy development: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 26 –52. doi:10.1080/10888430802631734Google Scholar