Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:30:57.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of informational adequacy in speech and writing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Donald L. Rubin ,
Lee Galda  and
Anthony D. Pellegrini
Donald L. Rubin*
Affiliation:
The University of Georgia
Lee Galda
Affiliation:
The University of Georgia
Anthony D. Pellegrini
Affiliation:
The University of Georgia
*
Donald L. Rubin, Departments of Language Education and Speech Communication, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theory and research pertaining to relationships between oral and written communication offer support to seemingly contrary hypotheses regarding the development of informational adequacy in speech and in writing. Because the social cognitive demands of face-to-face interaction are less complex than those of prototypical written communication, younger children might be expected to display greater audience adaptation in speech. On the other hand, the process of encoding in writing facilitates certain cognitive operations, and, therefore, children might be expected to communicate more effectively in writing. Empirical studies warranting conflicting conclusions, however, have administered tasks that tap different communication functions, either explanatory or referential. The present study replicates and extends this previous research by administering referential and explanatory communication tasks in both speech and writing to children at three grade levels. In addition, an independent measure of social cognitive ability was administered. Results confirmed increasing differentiation with age between speech and writing, with fifth graders displaying greater informational adequacy in writing. Children's performance in written communication, rather than speech, revealed a dependency on social cognitive ability. Differences between referential and explanatory communication suggested by previous research were confirmed.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 387 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Applebee, A. N. (1984). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54, 577–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, T. L., & Garvey, C. J. (1970). Studies in convergent behavior, II: A measure of communication accuracy (Report No. 91). Baltimore: Center for the Study of Social Organization of Schools, John Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Burleson, D. R., & Rowan, K. E. (1985). Are social-cognitive ability and narrative writing skill related? A response to Rubin et al. Written Communication, 2, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Tannen, D. (Ed.), Spoken and written language (pp. 35–54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chandler, M. J. (1973). Egocentrism and antisocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 9, 326–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, W. P. (1981). Referential communication activities in research and in the curriculum: A metaanalysis. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 189–203). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Dyson, A. H. (1983). The role of oral language in early writing processes. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 1–30.Google Scholar
Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122–128.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H., Botkin, P. T., Fry, C. L., Wright, J. W., & Jarvis, P. E. (1968). The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Flower, L. (1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41, 19–37.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1977). Communication development as related to channel, incentive and social class. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 96, 75–141.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1978). Written communication as functional literacy: A developmental comparison of oral and written communication. In Beach, R. & Pearson, P. D. (Eds.), Perspective on literacy (pp. 130–152). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota College of Education.Google Scholar
Hildyard, A., & Hidi, S. (1985). Oral-written differences in the production and recall of narratives. In Olson, D., Torrance, N., & Hildyard, A. (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning (pp. 285–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, M. L., & Rentel, V. M. (1981). Research update: Conveying meaning in written texts. Language Arts, 58, 721–728.Google Scholar
Kroll, B. M. (1978). Cognitive egocentrism and the problem of audience awareness in writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 269–281.Google Scholar
Kroll, B. M. (1985). Social cognitive ability and writer performance: How are they related? Written Communication, 2, 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, B. M., & Lemperz, J. (1981). Effect of mode of communication on the informational adequacy of children's explanations. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 138, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzie, C. A. (1987). An experimental investigation of the determinants of implicitness in spoken and written discourse. Discourse Processes, 10, 31–42.Google Scholar
McCutchen, D. (1987). Children's discourse skill: Form and modality requirements of schooled writing. Discourse Processes, 10, 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, S. (1986). Narrative presentations: An oral preparation for literacy with first graders. In Cook-Gumperz, J. (Ed.), The social construction of literacy (pp. 94–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, D. (1978). Internal revision: A process of discovery. In Cooper, C. R. & Odell, L. (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure (pp. 85–104). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Looft, W. R. (1972). Egocentrism and social interaction across the life span. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 73–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Keefe, B., & Delia, J. G. (1979). Construct comprehensiveness and cognitive complexity as predictors of the number and strategic adaptation of arguments and appeals in a persuasive message. Communication Monographs, 46, 231–240.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1986). The cognitive sequences of literacy. Canadian Psychology, 27, 109–121.Google Scholar
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D., Galda, S. L., & Rubin, D. L. (1984a). Context in text: The development of oral and written language in two genres. Child Development, 55, 1549–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D., Galda, S. L., & Rubin, D. L. (1984b). Persuasion as a social cognitive activity: The effects of age and channel of communication on children's production of persuasive messages. Language and Communication, 4, 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1955). Language and thought of the child. New York: Meridian Books. (Original work published 1926)Google Scholar
Piche, G. L., & Roen, D. (1987). Social cognition and writing: Interpersonal cognitive complexity and abstractness, and the quality of students' persuasive writing. Written Communication, 4, 68–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piche, G. L., Rubin, D. L., & Michlin, M. L. (1978). Age and social class in children's persuasive communication appeals. Child Development, 48, 773–780.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. L. (1982). Adapting syntax in writing to varying audiences as a function of age and social cognitive ability. Journal of Child Language, 9, 497–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, D. L. (1984). Social cognition and written communication. Written Communication, 1, 211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D. L. (1987). Divergence and convergence between oral and written communication. Topics in Language Disorders, 7(4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D. L., Piche, G. L., Michlin, M. L., & Johnson, F. L. (1984). Social cognitive ability as a predictor of the quality of fourth-graders' written narratives. In Beach, R. & Bridwell, L. (Eds.), New directions in composition research (pp. 297–308). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. L., & Rafoth, B. A. (1986). Social cognitive ability as a predictor of the quality of expository and persuasive writing among college freshman. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 9–21.Google Scholar
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Goelman, H. (1982). The role of production factors in writing ability. In Nystrand, M. (Ed.), What writers know (pp. 173–210). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & McDonald, J. D. S. (1977). Role taking in written communication investigated by manipulating anticipatory knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1981). Narrative, literacy and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaughnessy, M. P. (1977). Errors and expectations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, F. (1982). Writing and the writer. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Sulzby, E. (1982). Oral and written mode adaptations in stories by kindergarten children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulzby, E. (1986). Writing and reading: Signs of oral and written language organization in the young child. In Teale, W. & Sulzby, E. (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Writing and reading (pp. 50–89). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Sulzby, E. (1987). Children's development of prosodic distinctions in telling and dictation modes. In Matsuhashi, A. (Ed.), Writing in real time. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1982). Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written language. Language, 58, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D. (1985). Relative focus of involvement in oral and written discourse. In Olsen, D., Torrance, N., & Hildyard, A. (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning (pp. 124–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar