Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:26:17.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of a morpheme-based training procedure on the literacy skills of readers with a reading disability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2020

Irit Bar-Kochva Open the ORCID record for Irit Bar-Kochva [Opens in a new window] ,
Sebastian Peter Korinth  and
Marcus Hasselhorn
Irit Bar-Kochva*
Affiliation:
University of Cologne and German Institute of Adult Education (DIE)—Leibniz Centre for Lifelong Learning
Sebastian Peter Korinth
Affiliation:
Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main and Center for Individual Development and Adaptive Education of Children at Risk (IDeA)
Marcus Hasselhorn
Affiliation:
Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Center for Individual Development and Adaptive Education of Children at Risk (IDeA) and DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education
*
*Corresponding author. Email: ibarkoch@uni-koeln.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of a computerized morpheme-based training procedure on the reading and writing skills of reading-disabled participants (N = 30, mean age = 11.23 years, SD = 0.935) was examined. Considering that fast morphological analysis has been found to have a central role in written word processing of skilled readers, the following training was designed to enhance this process: it consisted of a visual lexical-decision task in which morphologically complex words were visually presented while the duration of the word-stems’ presentation was gradually restricted. A control intervention consisted of the same task, except that the duration of a nonmorphological unit’s presentation was manipulated. The children were divided into two groups: one underwent the morpheme-based intervention, and the other underwent the control intervention. The morpheme-based training procedure had a positive effect beyond that of the control procedure on the spelling of untrained word stems embedded in trained prefixes and suffixes. These results suggest a general improvement in retrieval of orthographic–morphological representations in spelling. Improvements in other measures could, however, not be ascribed to the morphological manipulation alone. These results emphasize the link between morphological processing and spelling. However, the morpheme-based training procedure appears to be less relevant to the improvement of reading.

Keywords

morphologyreadingreading disabilityspelling
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 41 , Issue 5 , September 2020 , pp. 1061 - 1082
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Amthauer, R (1973). IST 70 Intelligence Structure Test—Manual instruction for execution and evaluation [IST 70 Intelligenz-Struktur-Test—Handanweisung für die Durchführung und Auswertung] (4th ed.). Hogrefe: Göttingen.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Kochva, I. (2016). An examination of an intervention program designed to enhance reading and spelling through the training of morphological decomposition in word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 163–172. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2015.1108321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Kochva, I., & Amiel, M. (2016). The relations between reading and spelling: An examination of subtypes of reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 66, 219–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar-Kochva, I., Gilor, O., & Breznitz, Z. (2016). An examination of the process of acquiring visual word representations in dyslexic children. Journal for Educational Research Online, 8, 7–25.Google Scholar
Bar-Kochva, I., & Hasselhorn, M. (2015). In search of methods enhancing fluency in reading: An examination of the relations between time constraints and processes of reading in readers of German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 140, 140–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.06.012 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar-Kochva, I., & Hasselhorn, M. (2017). The training of morphological decomposition in word processing and its effects on literacy skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D. (2006). [R] lmer, p-values and all that. Retrieved from https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2006-May/094765.html Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyersmann, E., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. (2012). Parallel processing of whole words and morphemes in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.672437 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179. doi: 10.3102/0034654309359353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breznitz, B., Shaul, S., Horowitz-Kraus, T., Sela, I., Nevat, M., & Karni, A. (2013). Enhanced reading by training with imposed time constraint in typical and dyslexic adults. Nature Communications, 4, 1486. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2488 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breznitz, Z. (2006). Fluency in Reading: Synchronization of Processes. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruck, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2008). Morpheme-based reading aloud: Evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers. Cognition, 108, 243–262. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantiani, C., Lorusso, M. L., Guasti, M. T., Sabisch, B., & Männel, C. (2013). Characterizing the morphosyntactic processing deficit and its relationship to phonology in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 51, 1595–1607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantiani, C., Lorusso, M. L., Perego, P., Molteni, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2013). Event-related potentials reveal anomalous morphosyntactic processing in developmental dyslexia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 1135–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantiani, C., Lorusso, M. L., Perego, P., Molteni, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2015). Developmental dyslexia with and without language impairment: ERPs reveal qualitative differences in morphosyntactic processing. Developmental Neuropsychology, 40, 291–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlisle, J. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 464–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991–1060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). Processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 103–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 75–114. doi: 10.1080/01690960444000197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1098.Google ScholarPubMed
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbro, C., & Arnbak, A. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 1293–1326. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1293 Google Scholar
Good, J. E., Lance, D. M., & Rainey, J. (2015). The effects of morphological awareness training on reading, spelling, and vocabulary skills. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 36, 142–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183–208. doi: 10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 257–285. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2012.68979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, S. H., Ehri, L. C., & Locke, J. L. (2018). Morpho-phonemic analysis boosts word reading for adult struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 31, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heister, J., Wuerzner, K. M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R. (2011). dlexDB-A lexical database for the psychological and linguistic research. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Horn, W. (1969) Test System for School and Education Counseling [Prüfsystem für Schul-und Bildungsberatung, PSB]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. R., & Bowers, P. N. (2017). Morphological instruction and literacy: Binding phonological, orthographic, and semantic features of words. In Cain, K., Compton, D. L., & Parrila, R. K. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 437–462). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, J. R., & Bowers, P. N. (2018). Morphological instruction and literacy: Binding phonological, orthographic, and semantic features of words. In Berthiaume, R., Daigle, D., & Desrochers, A. (Eds.), Morphological processing and literacy development (pp. 217–243). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliegl, R., Masson, M. E. J., & Richter, E. M. (2010). A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition, 18, 655–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavric, A., Elchlepp, H., & Rastle, K. (2012). Tracking hierarchical processing in morphological decomposition with brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 811–816.Google ScholarPubMed
Leikin, M., & Even Zur, H. (2006). Morphological processing in adult dyslexia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 471–490. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9025-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenhard, W., & Schneider, W. (2006). ELFE 1–6: Ein Leseverständnistest für Erst- bis Sechstklässler [ELFE 1–6: A reading comprehension test for first to sixth graders]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E, & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). Defining dyslexia, comorbidity, teachers’ knowledge of language and reading a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marelli, M., Amenta, S., Morone, E. A., & Crepaldi, D. (2013). Meaning is in the beholder’s eye: Morpho–semantic effects in masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 534–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-Wilson, W., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 394–421. doi: 10.1080/01690960701588004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marx, A. E., & Stanat, P. (2012). Reading comprehension of immigrant students in Germany: Research evidence on determinants and target points for intervention. Reading and Writing, 25, 1929–1945. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9307-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, K., & Landerl, K. (2010). Reading and spelling tests, SLRT-II. [Lese- und Rechtschreibtest (SLRT-II): Weiterentwicklung des Salzburger Lese- und Rechtschreibtests] . Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
Morris, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. (2008). An electrophysiological investigation of early effects of masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1021–1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagler, T., Lonnemann, J., Linkersdörfer, J., Hasselhorn, M., & Lindberg, S. (2014). The impact of reading material’s lexical accessibility on text fading effects in children’s reading performance. Reading and Writing, 27, 841–853. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9468-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Olsson, J. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 289–307. doi: 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life. The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading, Mathematical, and Scientific Literacy. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
OECD. (2003). Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow. Further results from PISA 2000. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
Oswald, W. D., & Roth, E. (1997). Der Zahlen-Verbindungs-Test (ZVT) [Number Trail Making Test]. 2. überarbeitete Auflage. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Penke, M. (2006). The representation of inflectional morphology in the mental lexicon. An overview of psycho- and neurolinguistic methods and results. In Wünderlich, D. (Ed.), Advances in theory of the lexicon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Petermann, F., & Daseking, M. (2012). Zürcher Lesetest-II (ZLT-II). Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.Google Scholar
Quémart, P., & Casalis, S. (2015). Visual processing of derivational morphology in children with developmental dyslexia: Insights from masked priming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 345 – 376. doi: 10.1017/S014271641300026X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quémart, P., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2011). The role of form and meaning in the processing of written morphology: A priming study in French developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 478–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raveh, M., & Schiff, R. (2008). Visual and auditory morphological priming in adults with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 221–252. doi: 10.1080/10888430801917068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing . Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/ Google Scholar
Reed, D. K. (2008). A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in grades K–12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 36–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00261.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rispens, J., Been, P. H., & Zwarts, F. (2006). Brain responses to subject-verb agreement violations in spoken language in developmental dyslexia: An ERP study. Dyslexia, 12, 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rispens, J., Roeleven, S., & Koster, C. (2004). Sensitivity to subject-verb agreement in spoken language in children with developmental dyslexia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, G., Torgesen, J. K., Boardman, A., & Scammacca, N. (2008). Evidence-based strategies for reading instruction of older students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueckl, J. G. (2010). Connectionism and the role of morphology in visual word recognition. Mental Lexicon, 1, 371–400. doi: 10.1075/ml.5.3.07rue CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, R., & Raveh, M. (2007). Deficient morphological processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: Another barrier to efficient word recognition. Dyslexia, 13, 110–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiff, R., Raveh, M., & Fighel, A. (2012). The development of the Hebrew mental lexicon: When morphological representations become devoid of their meaning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D. L., & Shalev, C. (2004). Self-teaching in normal and disabled readers. Reading and Writing, 17, 769–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2005). Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1130–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F. (2007) Stem access in regular and irregular inflection: Evidence from German participles. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 325–347. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S., & Clahsen, H. (1999). Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition, 72, 203–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taha, H., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2016). The role of phonological versus morphological skills in the development of Arabic spelling: An intervention study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45, 507–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsesmeli, S. N., Douvalis, D., & Kyrou, K. (2011). Effects of morphological training on individuals with difficulties in spelling acquisition: Evidence from Greek. In Fabini, B. C. (Ed.), Spelling skills: Acquisition, abilities, and reading connection (pp. 1–50). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Tsesmeli, S. N., & Seymour, P. H. (2009). The effects of training of morphological structure on spelling derived words by dyslexic adolescents. British Journal of Psychology, 100, 565–592. doi: 10.1348/000712608X371915 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhoeven, L., & Schreuder, R. (2011). Morpheme frequency effects in Dutch complex word reading: A developmental perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 483–498. doi: 10.1017/S0142716411000178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. (1993). ICD-10: The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: Author.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bar-Kochva et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Bar-Kochva et al. supplementary material(File)
File 46.1 KB