Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:41:50.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2004

ELINOR SAIEGH–HADDAD
ELINOR SAIEGH–HADDAD
Affiliation:
Bar-Ilan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study examined the impact of the phonemic and lexical distance between Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and a spoken Arabic vernacular (SAV) on phonological analysis among kindergarten (N=24) and first grade (N=42) native Arabic-speaking children. We tested the effect of the lexical status of the word (SAV, MSA, and pseudoword), as well as the linguistic affiliation of the target phoneme (SAV vs. MSA), on initial and final phoneme isolation. Results showed that, when words were composed of SAV phonemes only, the lexical status of the word did not affect phoneme isolation. However, when MSA and pseudowords encoded both SAV and MSA phonemes, kindergarteners found MSA words significantly more difficult to analyze. Comparing children's ability to isolate SAV versus MSA phonemes revealed that all children found MSA phonemes significantly more difficult to isolate. Kindergarteners found MSA phonemes that were embedded within MSA words even more difficult to isolate. Results underscore the role of the lexical status of the stimulus word, as well as the linguistic affiliation of the target phoneme in phonological analysis in a diglossic context.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , October 2004 , pp. 495 - 512
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ababneh Y. 2000. Studies in the linguistics and phonology of Arabic. Dar El-Shorook, Amman, Jordan (in Arabic).
Abu-Rabia S. 2000. Effects of exposure to literary Arabic on reading comprehension in a diglossic situation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 147– 157.Google Scholar
Adams M. 1990. Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Caravalos M., & Bruck M. 1993. The effect of oral and written language input in children's phonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 1– 30.Google Scholar
Charity A. H., Scarborough H., & Griffin D. M. 2002. Familiarity with “School English” in African-American children and its relation to early reading achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. Chicago.
Cossu G., Shankweiler D., Liberman I. Y., Katz L., & Tola G. 1988. Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 1– 16.Google Scholar
Durgunoglu A. Y., & Oney B. 1999. A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 281– 299.Google Scholar
Elbro C. 1996. Early linguistic abilities and reading development: A review and a hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 453– 485.Google Scholar
Elbro C. 1998. When reading is “readn” or somthn. Distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items in normal and disabled readers. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 149– 153.Google Scholar
Feitelson D., Goldstein Z., Iraqi J., & Share D. L. 1993. Effects of listening to story reading on aspects of literacy acquisition in a diglossic situation. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 71– 79.Google Scholar
Ferguson C. A. 1959. Diglossia. Word, 14, 47– 56.Google Scholar
Fledge J. E. 1987. The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47– 65.Google Scholar
Fowler A. E. 1991. How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness. In S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 79– 117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goswami U., & Bryant P. 1990. Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
Gough P. B., Hoover W. A., & Peterson C. L. 1996. Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties (pp. 1– 13). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gough P. B., & Tunmer W. E. 1986. Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6– 10.Google Scholar
Hoover W. A., & Gough P. B. 1990. The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127– 160.Google Scholar
LaBerge D., & Samuels S. J. 1974. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293– 323.Google Scholar
Labov W. 1995. Can reading failure be reversed: a linguistic approach to the question. In V. Gadsden & D. Wagner (Eds.), Literacy among African-American youth: Issues in learning, teaching, and schooling (pp. 39– 68). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Maamouri M. 1998. Language education and human development: Arabic diglossia and its impact on the quality of education in the Arab region, Discussion paper prepared for The World Bank. The Mediterranean Development Forum.
Mann V., & Wimmer H. 2002. Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 653– 682.Google Scholar
McBride–Chang C. 1995. What is phonological awareness? Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 179– 192.Google Scholar
Metsala J. L. 1997a. An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 47– 56.Google Scholar
Metsala J. L. 1997b. Spoken word recognition in reading disabled children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 159– 169.Google Scholar
Metsala J. L. 1999. Young children's phonological awareness and non-word repetition as a function of vocabulary development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 3– 19.Google Scholar
Metsala J. L., & Walley A. C. 1998. Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability, In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 89– 120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Oney B., & Goldman S. R. 1984. Decoding and comprehension skills in Turkish and English: Effects of the regularity of grapheme–phoneme correspondences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 557– 568.Google Scholar
Perfetti C. A. 1985. Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rickford J. R., & Rickford A. E. 1995. Dialect readers revisited. Linguistics and Education, 7, 107– 128.Google Scholar
Saiegh–Haddad E. 2003. Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 431– 451.Google Scholar
Saiegh–Haddad E. 2004. Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Treiman R. 1985. Onset and rimes as units of spoken syllables: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 161– 181.Google Scholar
Treiman R. 1988. The internal structure of the syllable. In G. Carlson & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 27– 52). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Treiman R., & Weatherson S. 1992. Effects of linguistic structure on children's ability to isolate initial consonants. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 174– 201.Google Scholar
Treiman R., & Zukowsky A. 1991. Levels of phonological awareness. In S. A. Badry & D. P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 67– 83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wade–Woolley L., & Geva E. 2000. Processing novel phonemic contrasts in the acquisition of L2 word reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 295– 311.Google Scholar
Wagner R. K., & Torgesen J. K. 1987. The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192– 212.Google Scholar
Walley A. C., Metsala J. L., & Garlock V. M. 2003. Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 5– 20.Google Scholar
Walley A. C., 1993. The role of vocabulary development in children's spoken word recognition and segmentation ability. Developmental Review, 13, 286– 350.Google Scholar
Walley A. C., & Fledge J. E. 1999. Effects of lexical status on native and non-native vowel perception: A developmental study. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 307– 332.Google Scholar
Wang M., & Geva E. 2003. Spelling acquisition of novel English phonemes in Chinese children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 325– 348.Google Scholar
Washington J. A., & Craig H. K. 2001. Reading performance and dialectal variation. In J. L. Harris, A. G. Kamhi, & K. E. Pollock (Eds.), Literacy in African American communities (pp. 147– 168). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wolf M., & Katzir–Cohen T. 2001. Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211– 239.Google Scholar