Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:34:58.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of accessibility of semantic word knowledge in monolingual and bilingual fifth-grade reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2012

M. CREMER  and
R. SCHOONEN
M. CREMER*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
R. SCHOONEN
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Marjolein Cremer, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 210, 1012 VT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: m.cremer@uva.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influences of word decoding, availability, and accessibility of semantic word knowledge on reading comprehension were investigated for monolingual (n = 65) and bilingual children (n = 70). Despite equal decoding abilities, monolingual children outperformed bilingual children with regard to reading comprehension and availability of semantic word knowledge. Individual differences in reading comprehension were accounted for by differences in availability of semantic word knowledge and to a lesser extent by speed of access to this semantic knowledge. Speed of access accounted for variance in reading comprehension beyond the variance accounted for by decoding and availability of semantic knowledge. A path model suggests that reading comprehension differences between monolinguals and bilinguals are mediated by availability of semantic knowledge. Analyses showed no significant interaction between predictor variables and language background. A multigroup analysis distinguishing proficient and less proficient comprehenders showed a small difference between the two proficiency groups, suggesting that the lexical–semantic variables are more predictive of reading proficiency in the proficient group than in the less proficient group.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , November 2013 , pp. 1195 - 1217
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aarnoutse, C., & Kapinga, T. (2006). Begrijpend Lezen. Ridderkerk: 678 Onderwijs Advisering.Google Scholar
Aarnoutse, C., Van Leeuwe, J., Voeten, M., & Oud, H. (2001). Development of decoding, reading comprehension, vocabulary, and spelling during the elementary school years. Reading and Writing, 14, 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abad, M. J. F., Noguera, C., & Ortells, J. J. (2003). Influence of prime-target relationship on semantic priming effects from words in a lexical-decision task. Acta Psychologica, 113, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, J. (2003). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In Guthrie, J. T. (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Appel, R., & Vermeer, A. (1998). Speeding up second language vocabulary acquisition of minority children. Language and Education, 12, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
August, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
August, D., Carlo, M., Lively, T., Lippman, D., McLaughlin, B., & Snow, C. (1999). Enhancing vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension in English language learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Beck, I. L., McCaslin, E. S., & McKeown, M. G. (1980). The rationale and design of a program to teach vocabulary to fourth-grade students (LRDC No. 1980/25). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center.Google Scholar
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1983). Learning words well: A program to enhance vocabulary and comprehension. Reading Teacher, 36, 622–625.Google Scholar
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betjemann, R. S., & Keenan, J. M. (2008). Phonological and semantic priming in children with reading disability. Child Development, 79, 1086–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biemiller, A. (2005). Size and sequence in vocabulary development: Implications for choosing words for primary grade vocabulary instruction. In Hiebert, A. & Kamil, M. (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 223–242). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carlo, M. S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N.et al., (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 188–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (1994). Are C-tests valid measures for L2 vocabulary research? Second Language Research, 10, 157–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cremer, M., Schoonen, R., Dingshoff, D., & De Beer, M. (2011). Do word associations assess word knowledge? A comparison of L1 and L2, child and adult word associations. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, V. S. (2002). The syntagmatic–paradigmatic shift and reading development. Journal of Child Language, 29, 189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, M. E. (1980). Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 656–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daller, M., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2007). Conventions, terminology, and an overview of the book. In Daller, M., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B. (1980). Mondelinge woordassociatienormen: 100 woordassociaties op 460 Nederlandse zelfstandige naamwoorden. Lisse, Switzerland: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, A., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1998). The BIA-model and bilingual word recognition. In Jacobs, J. G. a. A. (Ed.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 189–225). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, A., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 78–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnia, F., & Geva, E. (2007). Modeling growth in reading comprehension in EL1 and ESL children: A longitudinal, individual growth curve analysis from first to sixth grade. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Studies of Reading.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (2007). Word association patterns: Unpacking the assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J., Pany, D., & Schreck, J. (1978). Vocabulary and reading comprehension: Instructional effects. (Tech. Rep. No. 100). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. (1998). What's in a word that makes it hard or easy: Some intralexical factors that affect the learning of words. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 140–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Predictors of reading comprehension for struggling readers: The case of Spanish-speaking language minority learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 701–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1983). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication. Journal of Literacy Research, 15, 3–18.Google Scholar
Meara, P., & Wolter, B. (2004). V_Links: Beyond vocabulary depth. Angles on the English Speaking World, 4, 85–96.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In Mosenthal, P. B., Kamil, M. L., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nakamoto, J., Lindsey, K. A., & Manis, F. R. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English language learners’ word decoding and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 20, 691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamoto, J., Lindsey, K.A., & Manis, F. R. (2008). A cross-linguistic investigation of English language learners’ reading comprehension in English and Spanish. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Nation, K., Adams, J. W., Bowyer-Crane, C. A., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1999). Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: Evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70, B1–B13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (1977). The syntagmatic–paradigmatic shift revisited: A review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 93–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. (1984). The transition from infant to child memory. In Moscovitz, M. (Ed.), Advances in the study of communication and affect: Infant memory (Vol. 10, pp. 103–130). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: Experience, meaning, and memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, C. L., Carlo, M. S., Snow, C. E., & McLaughlin, B. (2002). Depth and breath of vocabulary in two languages: Which vocabulary skills transfer? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 719–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In Gorfein, D. S. (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. Decade of behavior (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In Verhoeven, L., Elbro, C. & Reitsma, P. (Eds.), Precursors of Functional Literacy. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. V. (2009). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In Snowling, M. & Hulme, C. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Petrey, S. (1977). Word associations and the development of lexical memory. Cognition, 5, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 246–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, D. (1999a). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 282–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, D. (1999b). The value of vocabulary knowledge measures in predicting ESL reading comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Qian, D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52, 513–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In Harley, B. & Hulstijn, J. H. (Eds.), Language learning and language teaching. Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing. (Vol. 10, pp. 209–227). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Schoonen, R., & Verhallen, M. (1998). Aspects of vocabulary knowledge and reading performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Schoonen, R., & Verhallen, M. (2008). The assessment of deep word knowledge in young first and second language learners. Language Testing, 25, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrooten, W., & Vermeer, A. (1994). Woorden in het basisonderwijs 15.000 woorden aangeboden aan leerlingen. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Smits, D., & Aarnoutse, C. (1997). Een longitudinaal onderzoek naar verschillen in taal- en leesprestaties van autochtone en allochtone kinderen. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Opvoeding, Vorming en Onderwijs, 13, 33–52.Google Scholar
Sticht, T. G., & James, J. H. (1984). Listening and reading. In Pearson, P. D. (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 293–317). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson-Schill, S. L., Kurtz, K. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Effects of semantic and associative relatedness on automatic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W. (Eds.), The organization of memory (pp. 381–404). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Umbel, V. M., Pearson, B. Z., Fernandez, M. C., & Oller, D. K. (1992). Measuring bilingual children's receptive vocabularies. Child Development, 63, 1012–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Buuren, S., & Oudshoorn, C. G. M. (1999). Flexible multivariate imputation by MICE. Leiden: TNO Preventie en Gezondheid.Google Scholar
Verhallen, M. (1994). Lexicale vaardigheid van Turkse en Nederlandse kinderen. Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar betekenistoekenning [Lexical skills of Turkish and Dutch children. A comparative study into meaning assignment]. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam/IFOTT.Google Scholar
Verhallen, M., & Schoonen, R. (1993). Lexical knowledge of monolingual and bilingual children. Applied Linguistics, 14, 344–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (1987). Ethnic minority children acquiring literacy. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (1990). Acquisition of reading in a second language. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 90–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (1992). Drie-Minuten-Toets: Handleiding. Arnhem: Cito.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (1993). Taaltoets Allochtone Kinderen—Bovenbouw [Language Test for Minority Children—Grades 5 to 8]. Tilburg: Zwijsen.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (2006). Sociocultural variation in literacy achievement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M., Miller, L., & Donnelly, K. (2000). Retrieval, automaticity, vocabulary elaboration, orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive, fluency-based reading intervention program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed