Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:14:15.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Syntactic development in early foreign language learning: Effects of L1 transfer, input, and individual factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2019

Holger Hopp ,
Anja Steinlen ,
Christina Schelletter  and
Thorsten Piske
Holger Hopp*
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Braunschweig
Anja Steinlen
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Christina Schelletter
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Thorsten Piske
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: h.hopp@tu-braunschweig.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores parallels and differences in the comprehension of wh-questions and relative clauses between early foreign-language (FL) learners and monolingual children. We test for (a) effects of syntactic first-language (L1) transfer, (b) the impact of input on syntactic development, and (c) the impact of individual differences on early FL syntactic development. We compare the results to findings in child second language (L2) naturalistic acquisition and adult FL acquisition. Following work on adult FL acquisition, we carried out a picture-based interpretation task with 243 child FL learners in fourth grade at different regular, partial, and high-immersion schools in Germany plus 68 monolingual English children aged 5 to 8 years as controls. The child FL learners display a strong subject-first preference but do not appear to use the L1 syntax in comprehension. Input differences across different schools affect overall accuracy, with students at high-immersion FL schools catching up to monolingual performance within 4 years of learning. Finally, phonological awareness is implicated in both early FL learning and naturalistic child L2 development. These findings suggest that early FL development resembles child L2 acquisition in speed and effects of individual factors, yet is different from adult FL acquisition due to the absence of L1 transfer effects.

Keywords

child foreign-language acquisitionindividual differencesmorphosyntaxtransfer
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 40 , Issue 5 , September 2019 , pp. 1241 - 1267
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adani, F. (2011). Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: Towards a grammatically based account. Journal of Child Language, 38, 141–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adani, F., van der Lely, H., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2010). Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua, 120, 2148–2166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avrutin, S. (2000). Comprehension of discourse-linked and non-discourse-linked questions by children and Broca’s aphasics. In Grodzinsky, Y., Shapiro, L., and Swinney, D. (Eds.), Language and the brain: Representation and processing (pp. 295–313). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D., Maechler, D., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (2006). Test for Reception of Grammar: TROG-2: Manual (Version 2). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Blom, W. B. T., & Bosma, E. (2016). The sooner the better? An investigation into the role of age of onset and its relation with transfer and exposure in bilingual Frisian-Dutch children. Journal of Child Language, 43, 581–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burmeister, P. (2006). Immersion und Sprachunterricht im Vergleich. In Pienemann, M., Keßler, J.-U., and Roos, E. (Eds.), Englischerwerb in der Grundschule. Ein Studien- und Arbeitsbuch (pp. 197–216). Paderborn: Schöningh/UTB.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Holland: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V. (2018). Child L2 acquisition. In Bayram, F., Miller, D., Rothman, J., & Serratrice, L. (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp. 103–126). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2011). Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, tense morphology and morpho-syntax in successive bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 318–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contemori, C., Carlson, M., & Marinis, T. (2018). On-line processing of English which-questions by children and adults: A visual world paradigm study. Journal of Child Language, 45, 415–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Contemori, C., & Marinis, T. (2014). The impact of number mismatch and passives on the real-time processing of relative clauses. Journal of Child Language, 41, 658–689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correa, L. M. (1995). An alternative assessment of children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching and assessment. Strasbourg: Language Policy Unit.Google Scholar
Cristante, V., & Schimke, S. (2018). Verarbeitung von Passiv- und OVS-Sätzen bei Kindern mit Deutsch als früher L2. In Schimke, S. & Hopp, H. (Eds.), Sprachverarbeitung im Zweitspracherwerb (pp. 169–194). Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
den Besten, H. (1983). On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In Abraham, W. (Ed.), On the formal syntax of the Westgermania: Papers from the 3rd Groningen Grammar Talks (pp. 155–216). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, J., Tager-Flusberg, P., Hakuta, K., & Cohen, M. (1979). Children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 57–64.Google Scholar
De Vincenzi, M. (1991). Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vincenzi, M., Arduino, L. S., Ciccarelli, L., & Job, R. (1999). Parsing strategies in children: Comprehension of interrogative sentences. In Bagnara, S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Science (pp. 301–308). Rome: Instituto di Psicologia del CNR.Google Scholar
Durrleman, S., Marinis, T., & Franck, J. (2016). Syntactic complexity in the comprehension of wh-questions and relative clauses in typical language development and autism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 1501–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnia, F., & Geva, E. (2011). Cognitive correlates of vocabulary growth in English language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 711–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Liu, H. (1999). Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FMKS, Verein für frühe Mehrsprachigkeit an Kitas und Schulen (2014). Ranking: Bilinguale Kitas und Grundschulen im Bundesvergleich. Retrieved from http://www.fmks-online.de/download.htmlGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119, 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2004). The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language, 31, 661–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2011). Which questions are most difficult to understand? The comprehension of wh-questions in three subtypes of SLI. Lingua, 121, 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerngross, G., Puchta, H., & Becker, C. (2014). Playway 4. Berlin: Klett.Google Scholar
Goodluck, H. (2005). D(iscourse)-linking and question formation: Comprehension effects in children and Broca’s aphasics. In Di, A. M. Sciullo (Ed.), UG and external systems: Language, brain and computation (pp. 185–192). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T. (2006). Another take on the L2 initial state: Evidence from comprehension in L2 German. Language Acquisition, 13, 287–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T., & Conradie, S. (2006). Investigating the L2 initial state. Additional evidence from the production and comprehension of Afrikaans-speaking learners of German. In Slabakova, R., Montrul, S. A., and Prévost, P. (Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development: In honor of Lydia White (pp. 89–114). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Branchini, C., & Arosio, F. (2012). Interference in the production of Italian subject and object wh-questions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 185–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberzettl, S. (2005). Der Erwerb der Verbstellungsregeln in der Zweitsprache Deutsch durch Kinder mit russischer und türkischer Muttersprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K., Goto Butler, Y., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? (Policy Report). Stanford, CA: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/Google Scholar
Haznedar, B. (2001). The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2017). The processing of English which-questions in adult L2 learners: Effects of L1 transfer and proficiency. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 36, 107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, G., & Fuse, A. (2007). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin-speaking children and adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1280–1299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaan, E., Ballantyne, J. C., & Wijnen, F. (2015). Effects of reading speed on second-language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 799–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenbacher, M. (2001). Universal grammar and parameter resetting in second language acquisition. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Kultusministerkonferenz. (2013). Konzepte für den bilingualen Unterricht– Erfahrungsbericht und Vorschläge zur Weiterentwicklung. Retrieved from http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2013/201_10_17-Konzepte-_bilingualer-_Unterricht.pdfGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. (2009). Second language acquisition in early childhood. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 28, 5–34.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education, Baden-Württemberg. (2016). Bildungsstandards für Englisch Grundschule: Klassen 2, 4. Retrieved from http://www.bildung-staerkt-menschen.de/service/downloads/Bildungsstandards/GS/GS_E_bs.pdfGoogle Scholar
Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 232–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Grüter, T. (2014). Introduction to “input and experience in bilingual development.” In Grüter, T., and Paradis, J. (Eds.), Input and experience in bilingual development (pp. 1–14). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Jia, R. (2016). Bilingual children’s long-term outcomes in English as a second language and sources of individual differences in their rate of English development. Developmental Science, 20, e12433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Rusk, B., Duncan, T. S., & Govindarajan, K. (2017). Children’s second language acquisition of English complex syntax: The role of age, input, and cognitive factors. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 67, 1–20.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., Tulpar, Y., & Arppe, A. (2016). Chinese L1 children’s English L2 verb morphology over time: Individual variation in long-term outcomes. Journal of Child Language, 43, 553–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15, 315–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petermann, F., & Petermann, U. (2008). HAWIK-IV. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 17, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pliatsikas, C., & Marinis, T. (2013). Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, T. (2012). The transfer of V2: Inversion and negation by German and Dutch learners of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, T. (2013). Competing grammars in the comprehension of questions and relative clauses in L1 German-L2 English. In Amaro, J. Cabrelli, Judy, T., & Pascual y Cabo, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2013) (pp. 170–179). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Rankin, T. (2014). Variational learning in L2: The transfer of L1 syntax and parsing strategies in the interpretation of wh-questions by L1 German learners of L2 English. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 432–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1976). SPM. Standard Progressive Matrices. San Antonio, TX: Pearsons.Google Scholar
Robertson, D., & Sorace, A. (1999). Losing the V2 constraint. In Klein, E. C. & Martohardjono, G. (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (pp. 317–361). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeper, T., & de Villiers, J. (2011). The acquisition path for wh-questions. In Villiers, J. De, and Roeper, T. (Eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition (pp. 189–246). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roesch, A. D., & Chondrogianni, V. (2016). “Which mouse kissed the frog?” Effects of age of onset, length of exposure, and knowledge of case marking on the comprehension of wh-questions in German-speaking simultaneous and early sequential bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 43, 635–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sağin-Şimşek, Ç. (2006). Third language acquisition: Turkish-German bilingual students’ acquisition of English word order in a German educational setting. Münster, NY: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Sánchez, L. (2011). Luisa and Pedrito’s dog will the breakfast eat: Interlanguage transfer and the role of the second language factor. In Angelis, G. De & Dewaele, J.-M. (Eds.), New trends in crosslinguistic influence and multilingualism research (pp. 86–104). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, W., & O’Brien, G. (2006). Oral language. In Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, W., Christian, D. (Eds.), Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence (pp. 14–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (2009). Unraveling inflection in child L2 development. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère, 1, 63–83.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinlen, A. K. (2016). Primary school minority and majority language children in a partial immersion program: The development of German and English reading skills. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 4, 198–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinlen, A. K. (2018). The development of English and German writing skills in a bilingual primary school in Germany. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoma, D., & Tracy, R. (2006). Deutsch als frühe Zweitsprache: zweite Erstsprache? In Ahrenholz, B. (Ed.), Kinder mit Migrationshintergrund: Spracherwerb und Fördermöglichkeiten (pp. 58–79). Freiburg: Fillibach.Google Scholar
Tracy, R., & Thoma, D. (2009). Convergence on finite V2 clauses in L1, bilingual L1 and early L2 acquisition. In Jordens, P., and Dimroth, C. (Eds.), Functional categories in learner language (pp. 1–43). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2005). Child L2, adult L2, child L1: Differences and similarities—A study on the acquisition of direct object scrambling in Dutch (Unpublished PhD thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands).Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2016a). Early child L2 acquisition: Age or input effects? Neither, or both? Journal of Child Language, 43, 608–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unsworth, S. (2016b). Quantity and quality of language input in bilingual language development. In Nicoladis, E., and Montanari, S. (Eds.), Lifespan perspectives on bilingualism (pp. 136–196). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (2011). The acquisition of German: Introducing organic grammar. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, J., Marx, P., & Schneider, W. (2007). Die Prävention von Lese-Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten bei Kindern mit nichtdeutscher Herkunftssprache durch ein Training der phonologischen Bewusstheit. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigl, W. (1999). Die Verbposition im Englisch deutscher Gymnasiasten. Beitraege zur Fremsprachenvermittlung, 36, 25–41.Google Scholar
Weiß, R. (2006). CFT 20-R: Grundintelligenztest Skala 2. Manual. Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. B. (2002). Early French immersion: How has the original Canadian model stood the test of time? In Burmeister, P., Piske, T. & Rohde, A. (Eds.), An integrated view of language development (pp. 357–379). Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
Woodard, K., Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. (2016). Taking your own path: Individual differences in executive function and language processing skills in child learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed