Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:56:57.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tracing the development of spatially modulated gestures in the manual modality in nonsigning Chinese-speaking children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

WING-CHEE SO  and
KIT-YI MIRANDA WONG
WING-CHEE SO*
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong
KIT-YI MIRANDA WONG
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Wing-Chee So, Department of Educational Psychology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. E-mail: wingchee@cuhk.edu.hk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Speakers employ gestures to identify nonpresent objects in nonneutral locations (e.g., pointing to the left to indicate a toy car) and maintain the same spatial locations to indicate the same objects throughout the discourse. These kinds of gestures are referred to as shared-location spatially modulated gestures. Previous research showed that native signers form associations between locations and objects as early as age 5. We examined whether nonsigning children also produced shared-location spatially modulated gestures as early as age 5, and if so, whether such ability is associated with verbal memory, spatial memory, and eductive reasoning (i.e., the ability to derive meaning from the complex situations). Our results showed that nonsigning children use spatial devices in their gestures as early as age 5, but such ability is not well developed until age 7 to 11. It is interesting that different types of cognitive skills may come into play in the production of shared-location spatially modulated gestures across different age groups. We found significant correlations between the production of this type of gesture and spatial memory in the younger children and eductive reasoning in the older children. Thus, there is possibly a developmental shift of the cognitive processes involved in the production of shared-location spatially modulated gestures.

Keywords

eductive reasoninggesturenonsigning childrenspatial modulation
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 527 - 544
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aronoff, M., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Sandler, W. (2003). Classifier constructions and morphology in two sign languages. In Emmorey, K. (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 53–84). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U., Lillo-Martin, D., O'Grady, L., & van Hoek, K. (1990). The development of spatialized syntactic mechanisms in American Sign Language. In Edmondson, W. & Karlsson, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research (pp. 16–25). Hamburg: Signum-Verlag Press.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U., van Hoek, K., Lillo-Martin, D., & O'Grady, L. (1993). The acquisition of syntax and space in young deaf signers. In Bishop, D. & Mogford, K. (Eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances (pp. 132–149). Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone. (Original work published 1988)Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition of semantic categories. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 475–511). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassell, J., & McNeill, D. (1991). Non-verbal imagery and the poetics of prose. Poetics Today, 12, 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, A. S. (2006). The Hong Kong List Learning Test (2nd ed.). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
Chan, A. S., Ho, Y. C., & Cheung, M. C. (1998). Music training improves verbal memory. Nature, 396, 128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, A. S., Ho, S., & Poon, W. S. (2002). Neuropsychological sequelae of patients treated with microsurgical clipping or endovascular embolization for anterior communicating artery aneurysm. European Neurology, 47, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, A. S., Kwok, J., Chiu, H., Lam, L., Pang, A., & Chow, L. (2000). Memory and organizational strategies in chronic and acute schizophrenic patients. Schizophrenia Research, 41, 431–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, M.-C., Chan, A. S., Law, S. C., Chan, J. H., & Tse, V. K. (2000). Cognitive function of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma with and without temporal lobe radionecrosis. Archives of Neurology, 57, 1347–1352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chu, M., Meyer, A. S., Foulkes, L., & Kita, S. (2014). Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: The role of cognitive abilities and empathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 694–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmorey, K. (1996). The confluence of space and language in signed language. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M. S., Nadel, L., & Garrettt, M. F. (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 171–209). Cambidge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E. (1993). Space in Danish sign language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (1998). Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse: A study of learners of French and Swedish. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2003). Gestures, referents, and anaphoric linkage in learner varieties. In Dimroth, C. & Starren, M. (Eds.), Information structure and the dynamics of language acquisition (pp. 311–328). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2006). Handling discourse: Gestures, reference tracking, and communication strategies in early L2. Language Learning, 56, 155–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2007). Raise your hand if you're spatial: Relations between verbal and spatial skills and representational gesture production. Gesture, 7, 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S. (2009). Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Bellugi, U., Struxness, L., & O'Grady, M. (1985). The acquisition of spatially organized syntax. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 24, 70–78.Google Scholar
Loew, R. (1984). Roles and reference in American Sign Language: A developmental perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota).Google Scholar
Ma, T. M. K. (1999). The clinical validity of the Hong Kong List Learning Test in identifying patients with temporal lobe lesions (Unpublished master's thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong).Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2000). Catchments and contexts: Non-modular factors in speech and gesture production. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 312–328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (2015). Why we gesture? New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D., & Levy, E. T. (1993). Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes, 16, 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, J. E., & Meyers, K. R. (1995). Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1936). Mental tests used in genetic studies: The performances of related individuals in tests mainly educative and mainly reproductive (Unpublished master's thesis, University of London).Google Scholar
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2003). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales: Section 1. General overview. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Sassenberg, U., Foth, M., Wartenburger, I., & van der Meer, E. (2011). Show your hands—Are you really clever? Reasoning, gesture production, and intelligence. Linguistics, 49, 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekine, K., & Furuyama, N. (2010). Developmental change of discourse cohesion in speech and gestures among Japanese elementary school children. Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 10, 97–116.Google Scholar
Senghas, A. (2010). The emergence of two functions for spatial devices in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Human Development, 53, 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senghas, A., & Coppola, M. (2001). Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science, 12, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slobin, D. I., Hoiting, N., Kuntze, M., Lindert, R., Weinberg, A., Pyers, J., . . . Thumann, H. (2003). A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of “classifiers.” In Emmorey, K. (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (pp. 271–296). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
So, W. C., Coppola, M., Licciardello, V., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). The seeds of spatial grammar in the manual modality. Cognitive Science, 29, 1029–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
So, W. C., Kita, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Using the hands to identify who does what to whom: Gesture and speech go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Science, 33, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, W. C., Lui, M., Wong, T. K., & Sit, L. T. (2015). The use of hand gestures to communicate about nonpresent objects in mind among children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supalla, T. (1982). Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego).Google Scholar
Supalla, T. (1995). An implicational hierarchy in verb agreement in American Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2003). The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language. In Emmorey, K. (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier construction in sign language (pp. 169–196). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Yoshioka, K. (2008). Gesture and information structure in first and second language. Gesture, 8, 236–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar