Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:29:54.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unraveling the complexity of the relations of metalinguistic skills to word reading with struggling adult readers: Shared, independent, and interactive effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2019

Elizabeth L. Tighe Open the ORCID record for Elizabeth L. Tighe [Opens in a new window]  and
Mary A. Fernandes
Elizabeth L. Tighe*
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Mary A. Fernandes
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: etighe@gsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the shared, independent, and interactive effects of metalinguistic skills (phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and orthographic knowledge) to word reading with a sample of struggling adult readers. Controlling for vocabulary knowledge, a second-order latent factor of metalinguistic awareness accounted for unique variance (62.5%) in adults’ word reading skills. Two-way latent interactions between the metalinguistic skills (phonological awareness × morphological awareness, morphological awareness × orthographic knowledge, and phonological awareness × orthographic knowledge) revealed unique interactive contributions (1%–5.2%) of these skills to word reading controlling for the metalinguistic skill main effects and vocabulary knowledge. In particular, high levels of morphological awareness are critical to word reading irrespective of high or low phonological awareness and orthographic knowledge. In addition, higher phonological awareness skills are critical to word reading irrespective of high or low orthographic knowledge. These results indicate the importance as well as the complexity of the nature of metalinguistic skills underlying word reading for struggling adult readers. The theoretical, empirical, and applied implications of these findings are discussed in the context of researchers and practitioners invested in improving outcomes in adult literacy programs.

Keywords

adult literacymetalinguistic awarenessvocabulary knowledgeword reading
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , May 2019 , pp. 765 - 793
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adolf, S., Catts, H., & Little, T. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19, 933–958. doi: 10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apel, K. (2011). What is orthographic knowledge? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 592–603. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0085) CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Apel, K., Diehm, E., & Apel, L. (2013). Using multiple measures of morphological awareness to assess its relation to reading. Topics in Language Disorders, 33, 42–56. doi: 10.1097/TLD.0b013e318280f57b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apel, K., & Masterson, J. J. (2001). Theory-guided spelling assessment and intervention: A case study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 182–195. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2001/017) CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Apel, K., Wilson-Fowler, D., Brimo, D., & Perrin, M. A. (2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Reading and Writing, 25, 1283–1305. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9317-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berninger, V. W., Winn, W. D., Stock, P., Abbott, R. D., Eschen, K., Lin, S. J., … Nagy, W. (2008). Tier 3 specialized writing instruction for students with dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 21, 95–129. doi: 10.1007/s11145-007-9066-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, K. S., & Lee, C. (2012). Reader profiles for adults with low literacy skills: A quest to find resilient readers. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 1, 19–30. doi: 10.1177/0022219415609187 Google ScholarPubMed
Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179. doi: 10.3102/0034654309359353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braze, D., Katz, L., Magnuson, J. S., Mencl, W. E., Tabor, W., Van Dyke, J. A., … Shankweiler, D. P. (2016). Vocabulary does not complicate the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 29, 435–451. doi: 10.1007/s11145-015-9608-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D. P., & Mencl, W. E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 226–243. doi: 10.1177/00222194070400030401 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods Research, 33, 261–304. doi: 10.1177/0049124104268644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169–190. doi: 10.1023/A:1008131926604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassar, M. T., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children’s knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 631–644. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, S. H. (2012). Sounds, letters and meanings: The independent influences of phonological, morphological and orthographic skills on early word reading accuracy. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 456–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01496.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Benere, J., & Castles, A. (2012). Chicken or egg? Untangling the relationship between orthographic processing skill and reading accuracy. Cognition, 122, 110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.09.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Fourth Edition (PPVT-4). Circle Pines, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.1995.tb00077.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (2005a). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In Snowling, M. J., and Hulme, C. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 135–154). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (2005b). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fracasso, L. E., Bangs, K., & Binder, K. S. (2016). The contributions of phonological and morphological awareness to literacy skills in the adult basic education population. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 140–151. doi: 10.1177/0022219414538513 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 257–285. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2012.689791 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. doi: 10.1177/074193258600700104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, D., Ehri, L. C., & Perin, D. (1997). Are word-reading processes the same or different in adult literacy students and third-fifth graders matched for reading level? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 262–275. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, D., Ehri, L. C., & Perin, D. (2002). Do adult literacy students make the same word-reading and spelling errors as children matched for word-reading age? Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 221–243. doi: 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0603_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, D., Pae, H. K., Morris, R. D., Calhoon, M. B., & Nanda, A. O. (2009). Measuring adult literacy students’ reading skills using the Gray Oral Reading Test. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 133–149. doi: 10.1007/s11881-009-0027-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 11, 662–720. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi: 10.1037//1082-989X.3.4.424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L. A., & Carlisle, J. F. (2009). Teaching students with reading difficulties to be close readers: A feasibility study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 325–340. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2009/07-0096) CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Y.-S., Apel, K., & Al Otaiba, S. (2013). The relation of linguistic awareness and vocabulary to word reading and spelling for first-grade students participating in response to intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in School, 44, 337–347. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0013) CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirby, J. R., & Bowers, P. N. (2017). Morphological instruction and literacy: Binding phonological, orthographic, and semantic features of words. In Cain, K., Compton, D. L., and Parrila, R. K. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 437–462). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Leong, C. K. (2000). Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4, 5, and 6 children’s spelling. Reading and Writing, 12, 277–302. doi: 10.1023/A:1008168902922 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesgold, A. M., & Welch-Ross, M. (Eds.) (2012). Improving adult literacy instruction: Options for practice and research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Lovett, M. W., Frijters, J. C., Goudey, J., Graesser, A., & Greenberg, D. (2017). Developing and evaluating a reading intervention for adult literacy learners. Paper presented at the 24th annual Society for the Scientific Study of Reading (SSSR) Conference in Halifax, Nova Scotia.Google Scholar
MacArthur, C. A., Konold, T. R., Glutting, J. J., & Alamprese, J. A. (2012). Subgroups of adult basic education learners with different profiles of reading skills. Reading and Writing, 25, 587–609. doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9287-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahony, D. L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing, 6, 19–44. doi: 10.1007/BF01027276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, N. A., & Brownell, R. (2011). Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test—Fourth Edition (EOWPT-4). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Maslowsky, J., Jager, J., & Hemken, D. (2015). Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39, 87–96. doi: 10.1177/0165025414552301 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellard, D. F., Fall, E., & Mark, C. (2009). Reading profiles for adults with low-literacy: Cluster analysis with power and speeded measures. Reading and Writing, 22, 975–992. doi: 10.1007/s11145-008-9136-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muse, A. E. (2005). The nature of morphological knowledge (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University).Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2016). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In Wagner, R. K., Muse, A. E., and Tannenbaum, K. R. (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–77). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, W., Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Vaughan, K., & Vermeulen, K. (2003). Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second-grade readers and at-risk fourth-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 730–742. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanda, A. O., Greenberg, D., & Morris, R. (2010). Modeling child-based theoretical reading constructs with struggling adult readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 139–153. doi: 10.1177/0022219409359344 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond Phonological Skills: Broader Language Skills Contribute to the Development of Reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27 (4), 342–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00238.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2009). Children’s reading and spelling: Beyond the first steps. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649. doi: 10.1037/00121649.33.4.637 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (2006). The effects of learning to spell on children’s awareness of morphology. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 767–787. doi: 10.1007/s11145-006-9025-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, R., Forseberg, H., Wise, B., & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In Lyon, G. R. (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 243–277). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 554–566. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pae, H. K., Greenberg, D., & Williams, R. S. (2012). An analysis of differential response patterns on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—IIIB in adult struggling readers and third-grade children. Reading and Writing, 25, 1239–1258. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9315-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaut, D. C., Mcclelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.103.1.56 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratt, C., & Grieve, R. (1984). Metalinguistic awareness and cognitive development. In Tunmer, W., Pratt, C., and Herriman, M. L. (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children: Theory, research, and implications (pp. 128–143). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, D. K. (2008). A synthesis of morphological interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in grades K-12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 36–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00261.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roman, A. A., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., Wade-Woolley, L., & Deacon, S. H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in Grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 96–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueckle, J. G. (2010). Connectionism and the role of morphology in visual word recognition. Mental Lexicon, 5, 371–400. doi: 10.1075/ml.5/3/07rue CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueckle, J. G., & Raveh, M. (1999). The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network. Brain and Language, 68, 110–117. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatini, J. P., Sawaki, Y., Shore, J. R., & Scarborough, H. S. (2010). Relationships among reading skills of adults with low literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 122–138. doi: 10.1177/0022219409359343 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson—Fourth Edition (WJ-IV). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivation suffixes. Reading and Writing, 12, 219–252. doi: 10.1023/A:1008196330239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, M., Muse, A., Wagner, R. K., Foorman, B., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., … Bishop, M. D. (2015). Examining the underlying dimensions of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge. Reading and Writing, 28, 959–988. doi: 10.1007/s11145-015-9557-0 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tighe, E. L. (in press). Integrating component skills in a reading comprehension framework for struggling adult readers. In Perin, D. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of adult literacy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tighe, E. L., & Binder, K. S. (2015). An investigation of morphological awareness and processing in adults with low literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 245–273. doi: 10.1017/S0142716413000222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tighe, E. L., Little, C. W., Arrastia, M. C., Schatschneider, C., Diehm, E., Quinn, J. M., & Edwards, A. A. (2019). Assessing the direct and indirect effects of metalinguistic awareness to the reading comprehension skills of struggling adult readers. Reading and Writing, 32, 787–818. doi: 10.1007/s11145-018-9881-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2014). A dominance analysis approach to determining predictor importance in third, seventh, and tenth grade reading comprehension skills. Reading and Writing, 27, 101–127. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9435-6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2015). Exploring the dimensionality of morphological awareness and its relations to vocabulary knowledge in Adult Basic Education students. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 293–311. doi: 10.1002/rrq.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2016a). A quantile regression approach to understanding the relations between morphological awareness, vocabulary, and reading comprehension in Adult Basic Education students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 424–436. doi: 10.1177/0022219414 556771 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2016b). Modeling the relations among morphological awareness dimensions, vocabulary knowledge, and reading comprehension in Adult Basic Education students. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences, 7, 86. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.0008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2016c). Examining the relationships of component reading skills to reading comprehension in struggling adult readers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 395–409. doi: 10.1177/0022219414555415 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilstra, J., McMaster, K., Van Den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & Rapp, D. (2009). Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 383–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01401.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
To, N. L., Tighe, E. L., & Binder, K. S. (2016). Investigating morphological awareness and the processing of transparent and opaque words in adults with low literacy skills and in skilled readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 39, 171–188. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12036 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., Cain, K., & Parrila, R. (2011). Morphological awareness: A key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 523–534. doi: 10.1037/a0023495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2012). Test of Word Reading Efficiency— (2nd ed.) (TOWRE-2). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. A. (2013). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing—(2nd ed.) (CTOPP-2). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar