Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:22:54.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reducing discards in a demersal purse-seine fishery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2008

Jorge M.S. Gonçalves ,
Luis Bentes ,
Pedro Monteiro ,
Rui Coelho ,
Margarida Corado  and
Karim Erzini
Jorge M.S. Gonçalves
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências do Mar – CCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, FCMA Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
Luis Bentes
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências do Mar – CCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, FCMA Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
Pedro Monteiro
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências do Mar – CCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, FCMA Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
Rui Coelho
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências do Mar – CCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, FCMA Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
Margarida Corado
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências do Mar – CCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, FCMA Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
Karim Erzini
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências do Mar – CCMAR, Universidade do Algarve, FCMA Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
Get access

Abstract

Fisheries bycatches and discards constitute a significant problem in many fisheries worldwide. Unlike the pelagic purse-seine, the demersal purse seine usually targets high commercial value demersal species such as sea breams (e.g., Diplodus spp., Pagellus spp., Sparusaurata) and the European sea bass (Dicentrarchuslabrax), while discards consist mainly of pelagic species and juveniles of the above mentioned species. In order to evaluate the efficiency of a selectivity device in reducing bycatch and consequently of discards in a demersal purse seine fishery, experimental deployments were carried out. The bycatch reducing device (BRD) consisted in the use of a panel of diamond-shaped mesh netting of 70 mm stretched mesh in the posterior part of the purse seine. Data from 61 experimental fishing trials allowed the evaluation of discards, with Scomberjaponicus, Boops boops, Sardina pilchardus, Diplodus bellottii and Belone belone being the main discarded species. The mean discard ratio per set was 0.49 (± 0.30 standard deviation). The causes for discarding were also identified, with low commercial value being the most important reason. The results of the trials with BRD, were promising, with an average of 49% (± 24%) of the fish escaping per set, especially from those species that are most discarded. Overall, the use of this method for reducing discards can be considered positive for the following reasons: there is no need for structural modification of the fishing gear, the BRD is easy to deploy, and it is efficient in terms of species, sizes and quantities of fish that manage to escape. It therefore has significant benefits for the demersal purse seine fishery and possibly for other “métiers” as well.

Keywords

Bycatch reducing deviceDiscardFishing impactGear selectivityFisheries management
Type
Research Article
Information
Aquatic Living Resources , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 135 - 144
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD, 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alverson D.L., Freeberg M.H., Murawski S.A., Pope J.G., 1994, A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards. Rome, FAO.
Beek, V.A., Van Leeuwen, P.I., Rijnsdorp, A.D., 1990, On the survival of plaice and sole discards in the otter trawl and beam trawl fisheries in the North Sea. Neth. J. Sea Res. 26, 151–160. CrossRef
Beltestad A.K., Misund O.A., 1995, Size selection in purse seines. In: Solving bycatch: considerations for today and tomorrow. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Report No 96-03, pp. 227–233.
Borges, T.C., Erzini, K, Bentes, L., Costa, M.E., Gonçalves, J.M.S., Lino, P.G., Pais, C., Ribeiro, J., 2001, By-catch and discarding practices in five Algarve southern Portugal metiers. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 17, 104–114. CrossRef
Broadhurst, M.K., 2000, Modifications to reduce bycatch in prawn trawls: a review and framework for development. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 10, 27–60. CrossRef
CEC, 1992, Report from the Commission to the Council on the discarding of fish in Community fisheries: causes, impact, solutions. Brussels, Commission of the European Communities, pp. 1–50.
Chopin F., Inoue Y., Matsushita Y., Arimoto T., 1995, Sources of accounted and unaccounted fishing mortality. In: Solving bycatch: considerations for today and tomorrow. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Report No 96–03, pp. 41–47.
Clucas I., 1997, A study of the options for utilization of bycatch and discards from marine capture fisheries. Rome, FAO.
Crean, K., Symes, D., 1994, The discards problem: towards a European solution. Mar. Pollut. 18, 422–434. CrossRef
Davis M.W., Ryer C.H., 2003, Understanding fish bycatch discard and escapee mortality. AFSC Quartely Report, Seattle, pp. 1–9.
Engas A., 1994, The effects of trawl performance and fish behaviour on the catching efficiency of demersal sampling trawls. In: Ferno A., Olsen S. (Eds.) Marine Fish Behaviour in Capture and Abundance Estimation. Oxford, Fishing News Books, pp. 45–65.
Erzini, K., Costa, M.E., Bentes, L., Borges, T.C., 2002, A comparative study of the species composition of discards from five fisheries from the Algarve southern Portugal. Fish. Manage. Ecol. 9, 31–40. CrossRef
Erzini, K., 2005, Trends in NE Atlantic landings (southern Portugal): identifying the relative importance of fisheries and environmental variables. Fish. Oceanogr. 14, 195–209. CrossRef
Glass, C.W., Wardle, C.S., Gosden, S.J., Racey, D.N., 1995, Studies on the use of visual stimuli to control fish escape from codends. Part I. Laboratory studies on the effect of a black tunnel on mesh penetration. Fish. Res. 23, 157–164.
Gonçalves, J.M.S., Erzini, K., 2000, The reproductive biology of the black sea bream, Spondyliosoma cantharus (L.) from the SW Coast of Portugal. Sci. Mar. 64, 403–411. CrossRef
Gonçalves, J.M.S., Stergiou, K.I., Hernando, J.A., Puente, E., Moutopoulos, D.K., Arregi, L., Soriguer, M.C., Vila, C., Coelho, R., Erzini, K., 2007, Discards of experimental trammel nets in southern European small-scale fisheries. Fish. Res. 8, 5–14. CrossRef
Gray, C.A., Larsen, R.B., Kennelly, S.J., 2000, Use of transparent netting to improve size selection and reduce selectivity and reduce bycatch in fish seine nets. Fish. Res. 45, 155–166. CrossRef
Hall M.A., 1994, Bycatch in purse-seine fisheries. In: Pitcher T.J., Chuenpagdee R. (Eds.) Bycatches in fisheries and their impact on the ecosystem. The Fisheries Centre, Vancouver, University of British Columbia, pp. 53–58.
Hall, M.A., 1996, On bycatches. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 6, 319–352. CrossRef
Hall, M.A., Alverson, D.L., Metuzals, K.I., 2000, Bycatch: problems and solutions. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 411-6, 204–219. CrossRef
Hannah, R.W., Jones, S.A., 2000, By-catch reduction in an ocean shrimp trawl from a simple modification to the trawl footrope. J. Northw. Atl. Fish. Sci. 27, 227–233. CrossRef
Hannah, C.G., Shore, J.A., Loder, J.W., 2000, The drift retention dichotomy on Browns Bank: a model study of interannual variability. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 2506–2518. CrossRef
ICN, 2006, Livro vermelho dos vertebrados de Portugal. Lisboa, Instituto de Conservação da Natureza, ICN.
IGP, 2007, Portuguese Fisheries Inspection Department. Minimum legal sizes. http://www.igp.pt. Downloaded on September, 4, 2007.
IUCN, 2007, IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on September, 4, 2007.
Kelleher, K., 2005, Discards in the world's marine fisheries: an update. FAO Fish. Tech. Paper 470, 1–131.
Kennelly, S.J., Broadhurst, M.K., 2002, By-catch begone: changes in the philosophy of fishing technology. Fish Fish. 3, 340–355. CrossRef
Mesnil, B., 1996, When discards survive: Accounting for survival of discards in fisheries assessments. Aquat. Living Resour. 9, 209–215. CrossRef
Misund O.A., 1994, Swimming behaviour of fish schools in connection with capture by purse-seine and pelagic trawl. In: Ferno A., Olsen S. (Eds.) Marine Fish Behaviour in Capture and Abundance Estimation. Oxford, Fishing News Books, pp. 84–106.
Revill, A.S., Holst, R., 2004, Reducing discards of North Sea brown shrimp (C. crangon) by trawl modification. Fish. Res. 68, 113–122. CrossRef
Saila S.B. 1983, Importance and assessment of discards in commercial fisheries. FAO Fish. Circ. No. 765, 1–62.
Santos, A.M.P., Borges, M.F., Groom, S., 2001, Sardine and horse mackerel recruitment and upwelling off Portugal. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 58, 589–596. CrossRef
SAS Institute Inc., 1988, SAS/STAT* User's Guide. Release 6.03. NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G., 1989, Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press/AMES.
StatSoft, Inc. 1996, STATISTICA for Windows. Tulsa, StatSoft, Inc.
Stratoudakis, Y., Marçalo, A., 2002, Sardine slipping during purse-seining off northern Portugal. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59, 1256–1262. CrossRef
Tingley D., Erzini K., Goulding I., 2000, Evaluation of the state of knowledge concerning discards practices in European Fisheries. European Parliament, MegaPesca.
Valdemarsen J.W., Isaksen B., 1994, Bycatch reduction in trawls by utilizing behavioural differences. In: Ferno A., Olsen S. (Eds.) Marine Fish Behaviour in Capture and Abundance Estimation. Oxford, Fishing News Books, pp. 69–83.