Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:31:26.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assemblage urbanism. Becoming urban in late medieval Southampton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2018

Ben Jervis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is proposed that assemblage theory offers the possibility of exploring archaeological evidence in innovative ways, in order to write alternative narratives of urban development. By combining historical and archaeological scholarship with work in contemporary urban geography, it is proposed that the concept of urban decline in the later Middle Ages is problematic and a more fruitful alternative approach would be to focus on the transformation of urban assemblages. These ideas are explored by drawing upon archaeological evidence from Southampton, UK.

Keywords

medievalurbanassemblage theoryurban declineSouthamptonagencytemporality
Type
Articles
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , December 2018 , pp. 135 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acuto, M., 2011: Putting ANTs into the mille-feuille, City 15 (5), 552–62.Google Scholar
Alberti, B., and Marshall, Y., 2009: Animating archaeology. Local theories and conceptually open-ended methodologies, Cambridge archaeological journal 19 (3), 344–56.Google Scholar
Anderson, B., and Harrison, P., 2010: The promise of non-representational theories, in Anderson, B. and Harrison, P. (eds), Taking place. Non-representational theories and geography, Farnham, 1–34.Google Scholar
Arande, P., Howell, M. and Simmons, W., 2002: Fertile spaces. The productivity of urban space in northern Europe, Journal of interdisciplinary history 32 (4), 515–48.Google Scholar
Astill, G., 2000: Archaeology and the late-medieval urban decline, in Slater, T. (ed.), Towns in decline AD 100–1600, Aldershot, 214–34.Google Scholar
Bailey, M., 1993: ‘A tale of two towns’. Buntingford and Standon in the later Middle Ages, Journal of medieval history 19, 351–71.Google Scholar
Barad, K., 2007: Meeting the universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Bennett, J., 2010: Vibrant matter. A political ecology of things. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Brantz, D., 2017: Assembling the multitude. Questions about agency in the urban environment, Urban history 44 (1), 130–36.Google Scholar
Brenner, N., Madden, D. and Wachsmuth, D., 2011: Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory, City 15 (2), 225–40.Google Scholar
Bridbury, A., 1981: English provincial towns in the later Middle Ages, Economic history review 34 (1), 10–24.Google Scholar
Bridbury, A., 1984: Late medieval urban prosperity. A rejoinder, Economic history review 37 (4), 555–56.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S., Campbell, B., Klein, A., Overton, M. and van Leeuwen, B., 2015: British economic growth, 1270–1880, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brown, D., 2002: Pottery in medieval Southampton c.1066–1540, York (CBA Research Report 133).Google Scholar
Brown, R., and Hardy, A., 2011: Trade and prosperity, war and poverty. An archaeological and historical investigation into Southampton's French Quarter, Oxford.Google Scholar
Buchanan, I., 2005: Space in the age of non-place, in Buchanan, I. and Lambert, G. (eds), Deleuze and space, Edinburgh, 16–35.Google Scholar
Buchanan, I., 2015: Assemblage theory and its discontents, Deleuze studies 9 (3), 382–92.Google Scholar
Burgess, L. (ed.), 1976: The Southampton Terrier of 1454, London (Southampton Record Series 15).Google Scholar
Campbell, B., 2016: The great transition. Climate, disease and society in the late-medieval world, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Christopherson, A., 2015: Performing towns. Steps towards an understanding of medieval urban communities as social practice, Archaeological dialogues 22 (2), 109–32.Google Scholar
Cobb, H., 2016: Why the Mesolithic needs assemblages, in Bonney, E.M., Franklin, K. and Johnson, J. (eds), Incomplete archaeologies. Assembling knowledge in the past and present, Oxford, 1–8.Google Scholar
Conkey, M., and Gero, J., 1997: Programme to practice. Gender and feminism in archaeology, Annual review of anthropology 26, 411–37.Google Scholar
Crellin, R., 2017: Changing assemblages. Tracing vibrant matter in burial assemblages, Cambridge archaeological journal 27 (1), 111–25.Google Scholar
Dawdy, S., 2010: Clockpunk archaeology and the ruins of modernity, Current anthropology 51 (6), 761–78.Google Scholar
DeLanda, M., 1997: A thousand years of non-linear history, New York.Google Scholar
DeLanda, M., 2005: Space. Extensive and intensive, actual and virtual, in Buchanan, I. and Lambert, G. (eds), Deleuze and space, Edinburgh, 80–88.Google Scholar
DeLanda, M., 2006: A new philosophy of society. Assemblage theory and social complexity, London.Google Scholar
DeLanda, M., 2016: Assemblage theory, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
DeLanda, M., and Harman, G., 2017: The rise of realism, London.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., 1987: A thousand plateaus, London.Google Scholar
Dewsbury, J., and Thrift, N., 2005: ‘Genesis eternal’. After Paul Klee, in Buchanan, I. and Lambert, G. (eds), Deleuze and space, Edinburgh, 89–108.Google Scholar
Dobson, R., 1977: Urban decline in late medieval England, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 27, 1–22.Google Scholar
Dovey, K., 2011: Uprooting critical urbanism, City 15 (3–4), 347–54.Google Scholar
Dyer, A., 1991: Decline and growth in English towns 1400–1640, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dyer, A., 2000: ‘Urban decline’ in England, 1377–1525, in Slater, T. (ed.), Towns in decline AD 100–1600, Aldershot, 266–88.Google Scholar
Edensor, T., 2012: Vital urban materiality and its multiple absences. The building stone of central Manchester, Cultural geographies 20 (4) 447–65.Google Scholar
Farias, I., 2009: Introduction. Decentering the object of urban studies, in Farias, I. and Benser, T. (eds), Urban assemblages. How actor-network theory changes urban studies, London, 1–24.Google Scholar
Faulkner, P., 1975: The surviving medieval buildings, in Platt, C. and Coleman-Smith, R. (eds), Excavations in medieval Southampton 1953–1969, Vol. 1, The excavation reports, Leicester, 56–125.Google Scholar
Fleischer, J., 2015: On critical approaches, unintended consequences and the data of everyday life in ‘performing towns’, Archaeological dialogues 22 (2), 132–36.Google Scholar
Fowler, C., 2013: The emergent past. A relational realist archaeology of early Bronze Age mortuary practices, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, C., and Harris, O., 2015: Enduring relations. Exploring a paradox on new materialism, Journal of material culture 20 (2), 127–48.Google Scholar
Frichot, H., 2005: Stealing into Gilles Deleuze's baroque house, in Buchanan, I. and Lambert, G. (eds), Deleuze and space, Edinburgh, 61–79.Google Scholar
Frichot, H., and Metzger, J., 2016: Never believe that the city will suffice to save us! Stockholm gentry-fictions, in Frichot, H., Gabrielsson, C. and Metzger, J. (eds), Deleuze and the city, Edinburgh, 79–94.Google Scholar
Gao, J., 2013: Deleuze's conception of desire, Deleuze studies 7 (3), 406–20.Google Scholar
Gaydarska, B., 2016: The city is dead! Long live the city! Norwegian archaeological review 49 (1), 40–57.Google Scholar
Geller, P., 2009: Identity and difference. Complicating gender in archaeology, Annual review of anthropology 38, 65–81.Google Scholar
Gosden, C., and Malafouris, L., 2015: Process archaeology (P-Arch), World archaeology 47 (5), 701–17.Google Scholar
Greenhough, B., 2010: Vitalist geographies. Life and the more than human, in Anderson, B. and Harrison, P. (eds), Taking place. Non-representational theories and geography, Farnham, 37–54.Google Scholar
Gregson, N., and Rose, G., 2000: Taking Butler elsewhere. Performativities, spatialities and subjectivities, Environment and planning D. Society and space 18, 433–52.Google Scholar
Harris, O., 2013: Relational communities in Neolithic Britain, in Watts, C. (ed.), Relational archaeologies. Humans, animals, things, London, 173–89.Google Scholar
Harris, P., 2005: To see with the mind and think through the eye. Deleuze, folding architecture, and Simon Rodia's Watts Towers, in Buchanan, I. and Lambert, G. (eds), Deleuze and space, Edinburgh, 36–60.Google Scholar
Harrison, R., 2011: Surface assemblages. Towards an archaeology in and of the present, Archaeological dialogues 18 (2), 141–61.Google Scholar
Hicks, M. (ed.), 2015: English inland trade 1430–1540. Southampton and its region. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hinton, D., 1990: Archaeology, economy and society. England from the fifth to the fifteenth century, London.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2012: Entangled. An archaeology of the relationships between humans and things, Oxford.Google Scholar
Horvath, L., and Maicher, M., 2016: Rethinking the city as a body without organs, in Frichot, H., Gabrielsson, C. and Metzger, J. (eds), Deleuze and the city, Edinburgh, 33–45.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 2007: Lines, London.Google Scholar
Jervis, B., 2016a: Assemblage theory and town foundation in medieval England, Cambridge archaeological journal 26 (3), 381–95.Google Scholar
Jervis, B., 2016b: Decline or transformation? Archaeology and the late medieval ‘urban decline’ in southern England, Archaeological journal, doi:10.1080/00665983.2017.1229895.Google Scholar
Jervis, B., 2017: Assessing urban fortunes in six late medieval ports. An archaeological application of assemblage theory, Urban history 44 (1), 2–26.Google Scholar
Jervis, B., 2018: The agency of rules. The case of Southampton's Oak Book, in Hausmair, B., Jervis, B., Nugent, R. and Williams, E. (eds), Archaeologies of rules and regulation. Between text and practice, Oxford, 25–42.Google Scholar
Johnson, M., 2010: English houses 1300–1800. Vernacular architecture, social life, Harlow.Google Scholar
Jones, A., and Sibbesson, E., 2013: Archaeological complexity. Materials, multiplicity and transitions to agriculture in Britain, in Alberti, B., Jones, A. and Pollard, J. (eds), Archaeology after interpretation. Returning materials to archaeological theory, Walnut Creek, CA, 151–72.Google Scholar
King, C., 2010: ‘Closure’ and the urban Great Rebuilding in early modern Norwich, Post-medieval archaeology 44 (1), 54–80.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 2005: Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network theory, Oxford.Google Scholar
Law, J., and Mol, A., 1995: Notes on materiality and sociality, Sociological review 43, 274–94.Google Scholar
Lewis, C., 2016. Disaster recovery. New archaeological evidence for the long-term impact of the ‘calamitous’ fourteenth century, Antiquity 90, 777–97.Google Scholar
Lewis, R., 2017: Comments on urban agency. Relational space and intentionality, Urban history 44 (1), 137–44.Google Scholar
Lilley, K., 2000: Decline of decay? Urban landscapes in late-medieval England, in Slater, T. (ed.), Towns in decline AD 100–1600, Aldershot, 235–65.Google Scholar
Lilley, K., 2015: Urban planning after the Black Death. Townscape transformation in later medieval England (1350–1530), Urban history 42 (1), 22–42.Google Scholar
Lucas, G., 2001: Critical approaches to fieldwork. Contemporary and historical archaeological practice, London.Google Scholar
Lucas, G., 2012: Understanding the archaeological record, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lucas, G., 2015: Archaeology and contemporaneity, Archaeological dialogues 22 (1), 1–15.Google Scholar
McFarlane, C., 2011a: Assemblage and critical urbanism, City 15 (2), 204–24.Google Scholar
McFarlane, C., 2011b: The city as assemblage. Dwelling and urban space, Environment and planning D. Society and space 29, 649–71.Google Scholar
McFarlane, C., 2011c: Learning the city. Knowledge and translocal assemblage, Oxford.Google Scholar
McFarlane, C., 2011d: On context. Assemblage, political economy and structure, City 15 (3–4), 375–88.Google Scholar
McFarlane, C., and Anderson, B., 2011: Thinking with assemblage, Area 43 (2), 162–64.Google Scholar
Olsen, B., 2007: Keeping things at arm's length. A genealogy of asymmetry, World archaeology 39 (4), 579–88.Google Scholar
Olsen, B., Shanks, M., Webmoor, T. and Witmore, C., 2012: Archaeology. The discipline of things, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Palliser, D., 1988: Urban decay revisited, in Thompson, J. (ed.), Towns and townspeople in the fifteenth century, Gloucester, 1–21.Google Scholar
Platt, C., 1973: Medieval Southampton. The port and trading community, AD 1000–1600, London.Google Scholar
Platt, C., 2012: Archaeology and the ‘agrarian crisis’ in England 1315–22, Medieval archaeology 56, 292–8.Google Scholar
Platt, C., and Coleman-Smith, R., 1975: Excavations in medieval Southampton 1953–1969, Vol. 1, The excavation reports, Leicester.Google Scholar
Postan, M., 1973: Essays on medieval agriculture and general problems of the medieval economy, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pythian-Adams, C., 1978: Urban decay in late medieval England, in Abrams, P. and Wrigley, E. (eds), Towns in societies. Essays in economic history and historical sociology, Cambridge, 159–86.Google Scholar
Pythian-Adams, C., 1979: Desolation of a city. Coventry and the urban crisis of the later Middle Ages, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S., 1980: Decline and decay in late medieval towns. A look at some of the concepts and arguments, Urban history 7, 76–78.Google Scholar
Rigby, S., 2010: Urban population in late medieval England. The evidence of the lay subsidies, Economic history review 63 (2), 393–417.Google Scholar
Ruddock, A., 1951: Italian merchants and shipping in Southampton, 1270–1600, Southampton.Google Scholar
Ryzewski, K., 2015: No home for the ‘ordinary gamut’. A historical archaeology of community displacement and the creation of Detroit, City Beautiful, Journal of social archaeology 15 (3), 408–31.Google Scholar
Saul, N., 1982: English towns in the late Middle Ages. The case of Great Yarmouth, Journal of medieval history 8, 75–88.Google Scholar
Serres, M., and Latour, B., 1995: Conversations on science, culture, and time, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., 2007: Symmetrical archaeology, World archaeology 39 (4), 589–96.Google Scholar
Simone, A.-M., 2011: The surfacing of urban life, City 15 (3–4), 355–64.Google Scholar
Smith, M., 2008: Urban empty spaces. Contentious places for consensus, Archaeological dialogues 15 (2), 216–31.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 2009: Sigmund Freud's archaeological metaphor and archaeology's self-understanding, in Holtorf, C. and Piccini, A. (eds), Contemporary archaeologies. Excavating now, Frankfurt am Main, 33–45.Google Scholar
Tittler, R., 1984: Late medieval urban prosperity, Economic history review 37 (4), 551–54.Google Scholar
Van Oyen, A., 2015: The Roman city as articulated through Terra Siggilata, Oxford journal of archaeology 34 (3), 279–99.Google Scholar
Wallenstein, S.-O., 2016: Genealogy of capital and the city. CERFI, Deleuze and Guattari, in Frichot, H., Gabrielsson, C. and Metzger, J. (eds), Deleuze and the city, Edinburgh, 111–27.Google Scholar
Watts, C., 2013: Relational archaeologies. Roots and routes, in Watts, C. (ed.), Relational archaeologies. Humans, animals, things, London, 1–20.Google Scholar
Webmoor, T., 2007: What about ‘one more turn after the social’ in archaeological reasoning? Taking things seriously, World archaeology 39 (4), 563–78.Google Scholar
Witmore, C., 2007: Symmetrical archaeology. Excerpts of a manifesto, World archaeology 39 (4), 546–62.Google Scholar