Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:57:22.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Iron Age bog bodies of north-western Europe. Representing the dead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Melanie Giles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the phenomenon of Iron Age bog bodies which are currently the subject of competing claims over the respectful treatment of the ancient dead. It reviews the problems associated with their discovery, identifies why they attract such attention, and critiques both traditional interpretations of bog bodies and methods of display. The paper defends their archaeological analysis, arguing that this process can radically transform our understanding of past communities: their lifeways and world views. Using British and Irish examples, it discusses how intimate emotions and social bonds are constructed between bog bodies, on the one hand, and, on the other, the professionals and public who engage with them. It contends that a more reflexive approach which foregrounds these complex relationships might help address concerns about the public display of human remains in general. It concludes by advocating broad processes of consultation as well as a contextual approach to the interpretation and display of future bog bodies.

Keywords

bog bodieshuman remainssacrificeritualmuseum displayarchaeological ethics
Type
Notes
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , June 2009 , pp. 75 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldhouse-Green, M., 2001: Dying for the gods. Human sacrifice in Iron Age and Roman Europe, Stroud.Google Scholar
Aldhouse-Green, M., 2004a: Chaining and shaming. Images of defeat, from Lyn Cerrig Bach to Sarmitzegetusa, Oxford journal of archaeology 23 (3), 319–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldhouse-Green, M., 2004b: Crowning glories. Languages of hair in later prehistoric Europe, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 70, 299–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahn, P., 1984: Do not disturb? Archaeology and the rights of the dead, Oxford journal of archaeology 3 (2), 127–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahn, P., and Paterson, R.K.W., 1986: The last rights. More on archaeology and the dead, Oxford journal of archaeology 5 (3), 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J.C., 1987: Contextual archaeology, Antiquity 61, 468–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J., 1984: And out faces, my heart, brief as photos. Once in a poem, London.Google Scholar
Besterman, T., 2004: Returning the ancestors, available online at http://www.museum.manchester.ac.uk/collection/humanremains/fileuploadmax10mb,120894,en.pdf.Google Scholar
Bienkowski, P., 2007: Care assistance (comment and analysis), Museums journal, June 2007, 18.Google Scholar
Blackford, J., 2000: Palaeoclimatic records from peat bogs, TREE 15 (5), 193–98.Google ScholarPubMed
Boyle, A., 1999: A grave disturbance. Archaeological perceptions of the recently dead, in Downes, J. and Pollard, T. (eds), The loved body's corruption, Glasgow, 187–99.Google Scholar
Brickley, M., and McKinley, J., 2004: Guidelines to the standards for recording human remains, Reading (IFA Technical Paper 7).Google Scholar
Brothwell, D., 1986: The bog man and the archaeology of people, London.Google Scholar
Brothwell, D., 2006: BioArch and the ancient bog burials, University of York Magazine, March 2006, 13.Google Scholar
Brothwell, D., and Gill-Robinson, H., 2002: Taphonomic and forensic aspects of bog bodies, in Haglund, W.D. and Sorg, M.H. (eds), Advances in forensic taphonomy. Method, theory and archaeological perspectives, London and New York, 119–31.Google Scholar
Brück, J., 2004: Material metaphors. The relational construction of identity in Early Bronze Age burials in Ireland and Britain, Journal of social archaeology 4 (3), 307–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, S., 2008: Review. Temporary exhibition – Lindow Man. A bog body mystery, Manchester Museum, Museums journal, July 2008, 50–51.Google Scholar
Carroll, Q., 2005: Who wants to rebury old skeletons?, British archaeology 82, 11–15.Google Scholar
Chadwick, A., 1998: Archaeology at the edge of chaos. Further towards reflexive excavation methodologies, Assemblage 3, available online at http://www.shef.ac.uk/~assem/3/3chad.htm.Google Scholar
Cleal, R., 2008: Human remains from Windmill Hill and West Kennett Avenue, Avebury Parish, Wiltshire, held by the Alexander Keiller Museum. Appendix A – Questionnaire on the display of human remains from Windmill Hill (Autumn 1999). Appendix 4, available online at http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/server/show/nav.19822.Google Scholar
CoBDO, 2008: Request for the reburial of human remains and grave goods, Avebury. Appendix 1, available online at http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/server/show/nav.19822.Google Scholar
Coles, B., and Coles, J., 1986: The sweet track to Glastonbury, London.Google Scholar
Coles, B., Coles, J. and Jørgensen, M. Schou (eds), 1999: Bog bodies, sacred sites and wetland archaeology, Exeter (WARP Occasional Paper 12).Google Scholar
Coles, J., and Minnitt, S., 1995: Industrious and fairly civilised. The Glastonbury lake village, Exeter.Google Scholar
Cox, M, 1994: On excavating the recent dead, British archaeological news 18, 8.Google Scholar
Crossland, Z., 2000: Buried lives. Forensic archaeology and the disappeared in Argentina, Archaeological dialogues 7 (2), 146–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossland, Z., 2006: Revelation and detection. Discourses of bodies and evidence in archaeology and forensic science. Paper presented to ‘Disturbing bodies. Leverhulme workshop on the social relations of exhumation’, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, 4 November 2006.Google Scholar
DCMS, 2003: Report of the working group on human remains, London.Google Scholar
DCMS, 2005: Guidance for the care of human remains in museums, London.Google Scholar
Diedriech, M., 2006: No one can speak for ancient Britons, Museums Journal, June 2006, 16.Google Scholar
Dowd, S., 2008: Bog child, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, M. (ed.), 2006: Ethnographies of archaeological practice. Cultural encounters, material transformations, Lanham.Google Scholar
English Heritage and the Church of England, 2005: Guidance for best practice for treatment of human remains excavated from Christian burial grounds in England, London.Google Scholar
Farrell, D., 2001: Innocent landscapes. Sites of the disappeared, Stockport.Google Scholar
Field, N., and Pearson, M. Parker, 2004: Fiskerton. An Iron Age timber causeway with Iron Age and Roman votive offerings. The 1981 excavations, Oxford.Google Scholar
Finn, C., 2006: Bog bodies and bog lands. Trophies of science, art and the imagination, in Russell, I. (ed.), Images, representations and heritage. Moving beyond modern approaches to archaeology, New York, 315–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C., 2004: The archaeology of personhood. An anthropological approach, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S., 2008: Protecting the dead. Exhumation and the Ministry of Justice, Web journal of current legal issues (JCLI) 5 Web, available online at http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2008/issue5/gallagher5.html.Google Scholar
Garland, A.N., 1995: Worsley Man, England, in Turner, R.C. and Scaife, R.G. (eds), Bog bodies. New discoveries and new perspectives, London, 104–7.Google Scholar
Garratt-Frost, S., 1992: The law and burial archaeology, Birmingham (Institute of Field Archaeologists, Technical Paper 11).Google Scholar
Giles, M., and Joy, J., 2007: Mirrors in the British Iron Age. Performance, revelation and power, in Anderson, M. (ed.), The book of the mirror. An interdisciplinary collection exploring the cultural story of the mirror, Cambridge, 16–31.Google Scholar
Gill-Robinson, H., 2004: Bog bodies on display, Journal of wetland archaeology 4, 111–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glob, P.V., 1969 (reprinted 1998): The bog people, London.Google Scholar
Goodnow, K., 2006: Bodies. Taking account of viewer's perspectives, in Lohman, J. and Goodnow, K. (eds), Human remains and museum practice, London, 123–30.Google Scholar
Green, M., 1998: Humans as ritual victims in the later prehistory of Western Europe, Oxford journal of archaeology 17 (2), 169–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, E., 2006: A chilling tale of ritual murder, Daily telegraph. News review on Saturday, 7 January 2006, 19–21.Google Scholar
Heaney, S., 1990: New selected poems 1966–1987, London.Google Scholar
Hill, J.D., 1995: Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex, Oxford (British Archaeological Reports British Series 242).Google Scholar
Hingley, R., 1990: Boundaries surrounding Iron Age and Romano-British settlements, Scottish archaeological review 7, 96–104.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1997: ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’. Towards a reflexive excavation methodology, Antiquity 71, 691–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Housley, R.A., Walker, A.J., Otlet, R.L. and Hedges, R.E.M., 1995: Radiocarbon dating of the Lindow III bog body, in Turner, R.C. and Scaife, R.G. (eds), Bog bodies. New discoveries and new perspectives, London, 39–46.Google Scholar
Hunter, J., and Cox, M., 2005: Forensic archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Johnson, T., 1996: Holy fabrications. The catacomb saints and the Counter-Reformation in Bavaria, Journal of ecclesiastical history 47, 274–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D.G., and Harris, R.J., 1998: Archaeological human remains. Scientific, cultural, and ethical considerations. CA Forum on Anthropology in Public, Current anthropology 39 (2), 253–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J., 2007: Riddle of the bog, Guardian, 21 June 2007, G2, 23–25.Google Scholar
Kelly, E.P., 2006: Secrets of the bog bodies. The enigma of the Iron Age explained, Archaeology Ireland 20 (1), 26–31.Google Scholar
Keys, D., 2008: Mummy matters (breaking news), BBC history magazine 9 (3), 10–11.Google Scholar
Kirk, L., and Start, H., 1999: Death at the undertakers, in Downes, J. and Pollard, T. (eds), The loved body's corruption. Archaeological contributions to the study of human mortality, Glasgow, 200–8.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 1993: We have never been modern, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Leach, E., 1979: Discussion, in Burnham, B.C. and Kingsbury, J. (eds), Space, hierarchy and society. Inter-disciplinary studies in social area analysis, Oxford (BAR Supplementary Series 59), 119–24.Google Scholar
Levitt, S., and Hadland, L., 2006: Museums and human remains. Paper presented to the conference on ‘Respect for ancient British human remains. Philosophy and practice’, available online at http://www.museum.man.ac.uk/respect/Museums_and_human_remains.Google Scholar
Lindow Man blog, 2008: Lindow, Manchester, available online at http://lindowmanchester.wordpress.com/.Google Scholar
Lohman, J., 2006: Parading the dead, policing the living, in Lohman, J. and Goodnow, K. (eds), Human remains and museum practice, London, 21–24.Google Scholar
Lohman, J., and Goodnow, K. (eds), 2006: Human remains and museum practice, London.Google Scholar
McEvoy, K., and Conway, H., 2004: The dead, the law, and the politics of the past, Journal of law and society 31 (4), 539–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinley, J., and Roberts, C., 1993: Excavation and post-excavation treatment of cremated and inhumed human remains, Reading (IFA Technical Paper 13).Google Scholar
McLean, S., 2008: Bodies from the bog. Metamorphosis, non-human agency and the making of ‘collective’ memory, TRAMES 12 (62/57), 3, 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester Museum, 2007: Policy on human remains, available online at http://www.museum.manchester.ac.uk/collection/humanremains/fileuploadmax10mb,120796,en.pdf.Google Scholar
Manchester Museum, 2008: Collections. Human remains, available online at http://www.museum.manchester.ac.uk/collection/humanremains/.Google Scholar
Mays, S., 2008: Remains of the dead (star letter), British archaeology 99, 8.Google Scholar
Meredith, D., 2002: Hazards in the bog. Real and imagined, American Geographical Society 92 (3), 319–32.Google Scholar
Merriman, N., 2000: The crises of representation in archaeological museums, in McManamon, F.P. and Hatton, A. (eds), Cultural resource management in contemporary society. Perspectives on managing and presenting the past, London, 300–9.Google Scholar
Merriman, N., Bienkowski, P. and Chapman, M., 2008: Voicing contradictory feelings, British archaeology 98, 53.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice, 2008: Burial law and archaeology, available online at www.archaeologists.net/modules/icontent/inPages/docs/Burial%20law%20and%20archaeology%20statement.doc.Google Scholar
Morris, J., 2003: Dead but not buried, Museums journal, December 2003, 12–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhall, I., and Briggs, E.K., 2007: Presenting a past society to a present day audience. Bog bodies in Iron Age Ireland, Museum Ireland 17, 71–81.Google Scholar
Museums Association, 2008: Code of ethics for museums, London.Google Scholar
Oliver, M., 2004: Museum urges reburial of skeletons in its closet, Guardian, 6 January 2004, available online at http://arts.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1117202,00.html.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J., 2001: Ethics and the archaeology of human remains, Journal of Irish archaeology 10, 121–49.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J., 2007: Bog bodies, Heritage outlook, Winter 2006–Spring 2007, 18–20.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J., and Killgore, J., 2003: Human remains in Irish archaeology, Kilkenny.Google Scholar
Painter, T.J., 1995: Chemical and microbiological aspects of the preservation process in Sphagnum peat, in Turner, R.C. and Scaife, R.G. (eds), Bog bodies. New discoveries and new perspectives, London, 88–99.Google Scholar
Payne, S., 2007: Caring for our human heritage, British archaeology 97, 46.Google Scholar
Plunkett, G., Whitehouse, N.J., Hall, V.A., Charman, D.J., Blaauw, M., Kelly, E. and Mulhall, I., 2009: A multi-proxy palaeoenvironmental investigation of an Iron Age bog body from Oldcroghan, Co. Offaly, Ireland, Journal of archaeological science 36, 265–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PPG 16, 1990: Planning policy guidance 16. Archaeology and planning, available online at http://www.communities.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1144057.Google Scholar
Pryor, F., 2005: Flag Fen. Life and death in a prehistoric landscape, Stroud.Google Scholar
Pyatt, F.B., Beaumont, E.H., Buckland, P.C., Lacy, D., Magilton, J.R. and Storey, D.M., 1995: Mobilisation of elements from the bog bodies Lindow I and III and some observations on body painting, in Turner, R.C. and Scaife, R.G. (eds), Bog bodies. New discoveries and new perspectives, London, 62–73.Google Scholar
Raftery, B., 1996: Trackway excavations in the Mountdillon bogs, Co. Longford, 1985–1991, Dublin (Irish Archaeological Wetland Unit Transactions, 3).Google Scholar
Randerson, J., 2007: Give us back our bones, pagans tell museum, Guardian, 5 February 2007, 3.Google Scholar
Reeve, J., and Adams, M., 1993: The Spitalfields project Vol. 1. Across the Styx, York.Google Scholar
Restell Orr, E., 2004: Honouring the ancient dead, British archaeology 77, 39.Google Scholar
Restell Orr, E., 2005: Lindow Man, available online at http://www.honour.org.uk/projects/lindowman/lindowman.php.Google Scholar
Restell Orr, E., 2007: Report on the meeting at Manchester Museum in February 2007, available online at http://www.honour.org.uk/projects/lindowman/MMMeetingFeb2007.php.Google Scholar
Restell Orr, E., and Bienkowski, P., 2006: Respect for all, Museums journal, May 2006, 18.Google Scholar
Salter, C.J., and Ehrenreich, R., 1984: Iron Age metallurgy in central southern England, in Cunliffe, B.W. and Miles, D. (eds), Aspects of the Iron Age in central southern England, Oxford (OUCA Monograph 2), 146–61.Google Scholar
Scaife, R.G., 1995: Pollen analysis of the Lindow III food residue, in Turner, R.C. and Scaife, R.G. (eds), Bog bodies. New discoveries and new perspectives, London, 83–85.Google Scholar
Scarre, G., 2003: Archaeology and respect for the dead, Journal of applied philosophy 20 (3), 237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, J. 2008. Lindow Man. Manchester Museum gets bogged down. Manchester Confidential.Com, available online at http://www.manchesterconfidential.com/index.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and Hodder, I., 1997: Processualism, postprocesualism and interpretative archaeology, in I. Hodder,Shanks, M., Alexandri, A., Buchli, V., Carmen, J., Last, J. and Lucas, G. (eds), Interpreting archaeology. Finding meaning in the past, London, 3–29.Google Scholar
Sharples, N., 2008: Excarnation and witchcraft. Death in Iron Age Wessex. Unpublished paper presented at ‘The British Iron Age. New perspectives’, University of Oxford, 3–5 October 2008.Google Scholar
Sledzik, P.S., and Micozzi, M.S., 1997: Autopsied, embalmed and preserved human remains. Distinguishing features in forensic and historic contexts, in Haglund, W.D. and Sorg, M.H. (eds), Forensic taphonomy. The postmortem fate of human remains, London and New York, 483–95.Google Scholar
Stead, I.M., Bourke, J.B. and Brothwell, D. (eds), 1986: Lindow Man. The body in the bog, London.Google Scholar
Stead, I.M., and Turner, R.C., 1987: Lindow Man. An ancient body from a Cheshire bog. Lancashire and Cheshire antiquarian society 84, 1–14.Google Scholar
Stutz, L., 2003: Embodied rituals and ritualised bodies. Tracing ritual practices in Late Mesolithic burials, Lund (Acta Archaeologica Lundensia 46).Google Scholar
Swain, H., 2002: The ethics of displaying human remains from British archaeological sites, Public archaeology 2, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tacitus, C., 1970: The Agricola and The Germania, translation by H. Mattingley, revised by S.A. Handford, London.Google Scholar
Tarlow, S., 2001: Decoding ethics, Public archaeology 1 (4), 245–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarlow, S., 2006: Archaeological ethics and the people of the past, in Scarre, C. and Scarre, G. (eds), The ethics of archaeology. Philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice, Cambridge, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P., 2008: A remarkable peat of nature returns, Manchester evening news, 5 February 2008, 9.Google Scholar
Taylor, T., 2003: The buried soul. How humans invented death, London.Google Scholar
Thackray, D., and Payne, S., 2008: Draft report on the request for reburial of human remains from the Alexander Keiller Museum at Avebury, available online at http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/upload/pdf/Draft_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Timewatch, 2006: ‘The bog bodies’, producer John Hayes Fisher, London (originally transmitted BBC2, 20 January 2006).Google Scholar
Turner, R.C., 1995a: Recent research into British bog bodies, in Turner, R.C. and Scaife, R.G. (eds), Bog bodies. New discoveries and new perspectives, London, 108–12.Google Scholar
Turner, R.C., 1995b: The Lindow bog bodies. Discoveries and excavations at Lindow Moss 1983–8, in Turner, R.C. and Scaife, R.G. (eds), Bog bodies. New discoveries and new perspectives, London, 10–18.Google Scholar
Turner, R.C., 1999: Dating the Lindow Moss and other British bog bodies and the problems of assigning their cultural context, in Coles, B., Coles, J. and Jørgensen, M. Schou (eds), Bog bodies, sacred sites and wetland archaeology, Exeter, 227–33.Google Scholar
Van der Plict, J., van der Sanden, W.A.B., Aerts, A.T. and Streurman, H.J., 2004: Dating bog bodies by means of 14C-AMS. Journal of archaeological science 31 (4), 471–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Sanden, W., 1996: Through nature to eternity. The bog bodies of northwest Europe, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vaswani, R., 2001: Remains of the day, Museums Journal 101 (2), 34–35.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, T.M., 2002: Last rights. The ethics of research on the dead, Journal of applied philosophy 19, 34–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Archaeological Congress, 2006: WAC codes of ethics, available online at http://www.worldarchaeologicalcongress.org/site/about_ethi.php.Google Scholar
Wylie, A., 2003: On ethics, in Zimmerman, L.J., Vitelli, K.D. and Hollowell-Zimmer, J. (eds), Ethical issues in archaeology, Lanham, 3–16.Google Scholar
Yarrow, T., 2003: Artefactual persons. The relational capacities of persons and things in the practice of excavation, Norwegian archaeological review 36 (1), 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar