Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:41:20.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral theories, Homeric questions – and the shaft graves of Mycenae. A response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Sofia Voutsaki
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I would like to thank Silvia Tomášková, Christoph Ulf and James Wright for their comments, which allow me to clarify and expand my argument. As I cannot address all the points they raise in this response, I have decided to concentrate on three themes: (i) the application of moral theory, (ii) Homeric questions and (iii) the focus on the shaft graves of Mycenae.

Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , June 2010 , pp. 105 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, J.C., 1994: Fragments from antiquity, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barrett, J.C., 2000: A thesis on agency, in Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J. (eds), Agency in archaeology, London and New York, 61–68.Google Scholar
Bazelmans, J., 2002: Moralities of dress and the dress of the dead in early medieval Europe, in Hamilakis, Y., Pluciennik, M. and Tarlow, S. (eds), Thinking though the body. Archaeologies of corporeality, New York, 71–84.Google Scholar
Bennet, J., 2004: Iconographies of value. Words, people and things in the Late Bronze Age Aegean, in Barrett, J.C. and Halstead, P. (eds), The emergence of civilisation revisited, Oxford (Sheffield Studies in Aegean Archaeology 6), 90–106.Google Scholar
Bennet, J., and Davis, J.L., 1999: Making Mycenaeans. Warfare, territorial expansion, and representations of the other in the Pylian Kingdom, in Laffineur, R. (ed.), POLEMOS. Le Contexte guerrier en Égée à l’Âge du Bronze, Liège (Aegaeum 19), 105–20.Google Scholar
Blakolmer, F., 2007: Der autochthone Stil der Schachtgräberperiode im Bronzezetilichen Griechenland, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes in Wien 76, 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1977: Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M.B., 1999: The psychology of prejudice. Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of social issues 55 (3), 429–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M.B, 2003: Intergroup relations, 2nd edn, Buckingham and Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Brewer, M.B., and Miller, N., 1996: Intergroup relations, Buckingham.Google Scholar
Brück, J., 2001: Monuments, power and personhood in the British Neolithic, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7, 649–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfiel, E.M., 2000: On the archaeology of choice. Agency studies as a research stratagem, in Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J. (eds), Agency in archaeology, London and New York, 249–55.Google Scholar
Burt, R.S., 1992: Structural holes. The social structure of competition, Cambridge, MA and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busby, C., 1997: Permeable and partible persons. A comparative analysis of gender and the body in South India and Melanesia, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 3, 261–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J., 1990: Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity, New York.Google Scholar
Cairns, D.L., 2001: Oxford readings in Homer's Iliad. Oxford.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 1996: Enchainment, commodification and gender in the Balkan Neolithic and Copper Ages, Journal of European archaeology 4, 203–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J., 2000: Fragmentation in archaeology. People, places and broken objects in the prehistory of South Eastern Europe, London.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., and Gaydarska, B.: 2007. Parts and wholes. Fragmentation in prehistoric context, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cohen, A.P., 1994: Self consciousness. An alternative anthropology of identity, London.Google Scholar
Corbey, C., and Roebroeks, W. (eds), 2001: Studying human origins. Disciplinary history and epistemology, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crielaard, J.P. (ed.) 1995: Homeric questions. Essays in philology, ancient history and archaeology, including the papers of a conference organised by the Netherlands Institute at Athens, 15 May 1993, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dickinson, O.T.P.K., 1977: The origins of Mycenaean civilisation, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Dietz, S., 1980: Asine II. Results of the excavations east of the Acropolis 1970–1974, Fasc. 2. The Middle Helladic cemetery, the Middle Helladic and early Mycenaean deposits, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Dietz, S., 1991: The Argolid at the transition to the Mycenaean Age, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Dobres, M.-A., and Robb, J. (eds), 2000a: Agency in archaeology, London and New York.Google Scholar
Dobres, M.-A., and Robb, J., 2000b: Agency in archaeology. Paradigm or platitude?, in Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J. (eds), Agency in archaeology, London and New York, 3–17.Google Scholar
Dornan, J.L., 2002: Agency and archaeology. Past, present, and future directions, Journal of archaeological method and theory 9, 303–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H.L., 1980: Holism and hermeneutics, Review of metaphysics 34, 3–23.Google Scholar
Felten, F., Reinholdt, C., Pollhammer, E., Gauß, W. and Smetana, R., 2007: Ägina-Kolonna 2006. Vorbericht über die Grabungen des Fachbereichs Altertumswissenschaften/Klassische und Frühägäische Archäologie der Universität Salzburg, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes in Wien 76, 89–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, M., 1954: The world of Odysseus, New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., 1984: Histoire de la sexualité, III. Le Souci de soi, Paris.Google Scholar
Fowler, C., 2004: The archaeology of personhood, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R. (ed.), 2004: The Cambridge companion to Homer, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gero, J., 2000: Troubled travels in agency and feminism, in Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J. (eds), Agency in archaeology, London and New York, 34–39.Google Scholar
Giddens, A., 1979: Central problems in social theory. Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C., 2006: The structured self in Hellenistic and Roman thought, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosden, C., and Marshall, Y., 1999: The cultural biography of objects, World archaeology 31, 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, E.-J., 2009: Becoming persons, becoming ancestors. Personhood, memory and the corpse in Roman rituals of social remembrance, Archaeological dialogues 16, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M.S., 1973: The strength of weak ties, American journal of sociology 78 (6), 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziadio, G., 1988: The chronology of the graves of Circle B at Mycenae. A new hypothesis, American journal of archaeology 92, 343–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziadio, G., 1991: The process of social stratification at Mycenae in the Shaft Grave Period. A comparative examination of the evidence, American journal of archaeology 95, 403–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziosi, B., and Haubold, J., 2005: Homer. The resonance of epic, London.Google Scholar
Hamilakis, Y., 1996: A footnote on the archaeology of power. Animal bones from a Mycenaean chamber tomb at Galatas, NE Peloponnese, Annual of the British School at Athens 91, 153–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilakis, Y., Pluciennik, M. and Tarlow, S., 2002: Introduction. Thinking through the body, in Hamilakis, Y., Pluciennik, M. and Tarlow, S. (eds), Thinking through the body. Archaeologies of corporeality, New York, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, R., 1960: Death and the right hand, New York.Google Scholar
Hiller, S., 1990: The miniature frieze in the West House – evidence for Minoan poetry?, in Hardy, D.A., Doumas, C.G., Sakellarakis, J.A. and Warren, P.M. (eds), Thera and the Aegean World III.1. Archaeology, London, 229–36.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1982: Theoretical archaeology. A reactionary view, in Hodder, I. (ed.) Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 2000: Agency and individuals in long-time processes, in Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J. (eds), Agency in archaeology, London and New York, 21–33.Google Scholar
Horrocks, G., 1997: Homer's dialect, in Morris, I. and Powell, B. (eds), A new companion to Homer, Leiden, New York and Cologne, 193–217.Google Scholar
Iakovidis, S., 1981: Royal shaft graves outside Mycenae, in Betancourt, P. (ed.), Shaft graves in Bronze Age Greece, Philadelphia (Temple University Aegean Symposium 6), 17–28.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 1995: ‘People like us’. The concept of the anatomically modern human, Cultural dynamics 7, 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M., 1989: Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation, Journal of anthropological archaeology 8, 129–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M., 2000: Self-made men and the staging of agency, in Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J. (eds), Agency in archaeology, Cambridge, 213–31.Google Scholar
Jones, A., 2005: Lives in fragments? Personhood and the European Neolithic, Journal of social archaeology 5, 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karo, G., 1930–33: Die Schachtgräber von Mykenai, Munich.Google Scholar
Keswani, P.S., 1989: Dimensions of social hierarchy in Late Bronze Age Cyprus. An analysis of the mortuary data from Enkomi, Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 2, 49–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keswani, P.S., 2004: Mortuary ritual and society in Bronze Age Cyprus, London.Google Scholar
Keswani, P.S., 2005: Death, prestige, and copper in Bronze Age Cyprus, American journal of archaeology 109, 341–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilian-Dirlmeier, I., 1986: Beobachtungen zu den Schachtgräbern von Mykenai und zu den Schmuckbeigaben mykenischer Männergräber. Untersuchung zur Sozialstruktur in späthelladischer Zeit, Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 33, 159–98.Google Scholar
Kilian-Dirlmeier, I., 1997: Das mittelbronzezeitliche Schachtgrab von Ägina, Mainz (Kataloge vor- und frühgeschichtlicher Altertümer 27, Alt-Ägina 4.3).Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I., 1986: The cultural biography of things. Commoditization as a process, in Appadurai, A. (ed.), The social life of things, Cambridge, 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B., 1993: We have never been modern, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 1999: Pandora's hope. Essays on the reality of science studies, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lin, N., Cook, K. and Burt, S., 2001: Social capital. Theory and research, New York.Google Scholar
Liverani, M., 2001: International relations in the ancient Near East, 1600–1100 BC, New York.Google Scholar
Liverani, M., 2005: The Near East. The Bronze Age, in Manning, J.G. and Morris, I. (eds), The ancient economy. Evidence and models, Stanford, 47–57.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A., 1985: After virtue. A study in moral theory, 2nd edn, London.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A., 1988: Whose justice? Which rationality?, London.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A., 1991: Persons and human beings, Arion 1, 188–94.Google Scholar
Mauss, M., 1954: The gift, London.Google Scholar
Mee, C., and Cavanagh, W., 1998: A private place. Death in prehistoric Greece, Jonsered.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M., 1962: The phenomenology of perception, London.Google Scholar
Meskell, L., 1996: The somatisation of archaeology. Institutions, discourses, corporeality, Norwegian archaeological review 29, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, L., 1998: Intimate archaeologies. The case of Kha and Merit, World archaeology 29, 363–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, L., 1999: Archaeologies of social life, Oxford.Google Scholar
Meskell, L.M., and Joyce, R.A., 2003: Embodied lives. Figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience, London and New York.Google Scholar
Milka, E., 2006: From cemeteries to societies. The study of the Middle Helladic (2000–1500 BC) burials from the Argolid, southern Greece, Symposium voor Onderzoek door Jonge Archeologen (SOJA) Bundel 2005, Leiden.Google Scholar
Milka, E., in press: Burials upon the ruins of abandoned houses in the MH Argolid, in Philippa-Touchais, A., Touchais, G., Voutsaki, S. and Wright, J. (eds), MESOHELLADIKA. The Greek Mainland in the Middle Bronze Age, Paris (Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique, Supplément).Google Scholar
Morris, I., 2001: The use and abuse of Homer, in Cairns, D.L. (ed.), Oxford readings in Homer's Iliad, New York, 1–56.Google Scholar
Morris, I., and Powell, B. (eds.) 1997: A new companion to Homer, Leiden, New York and Cologne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S.P., 1989: A tale of two cities. The miniature frescoes from Thera and the origins of Greek poetry, American journal of archaeology 93, 511–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munn, N.D., 1983: Gawan kula. Spatiotemporal control and the symbolism of influence, in Leach, J.W. and Leach, E. (eds), The kula. New perspectives in Massim exchange. Cambridge, 277–308.Google Scholar
Mylonas, G.E., 1973: O Tafikos Kyklos B ton Mykenon, Athens (Bibliotheke tes en Athenais Archaiologikes Etaireias 73).Google Scholar
Negbi, O., 1994: The ‘Libyan landscape’ from Thera. A review of Aegean enterprises overseas in the Late Minoan IA period, Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 7, 73–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, B., 2003: Material culture after text. Re-membering things. Norwegian archaeological review 36, 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlie, M.A., 1999: Review article of M. Walzer, Thick and thin. Moral argument at home and abroad, Political theory 27, 140–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palaima, Th.G., 1995: The nature of the Mycenaean wanax. Non-Indo-European origins and priestly functions, in Rehak, P. (ed.), The role of the ruler in the prehistoric Aegean, Liège (Aegaeum 11), 119–42.Google Scholar
Palaima, Th.G., 2003: The inscribed bronze ‘Kessel’ from Shaft Grave IV and Cretan heirlooms of the bronze artist named ‘Aigeus’ vel sim. in the Mycenaean Palatial Period, Cretan Studies 9, 187–200.Google Scholar
Reese, D.S., 1995: Equid sacrifices/burials in Greece and Cyprus. An addendum, Journal of prehistoric religion 9, 35–42.Google Scholar
Rioux, B., 1963: L'Etre et la vérité chez Heidegger et Saint Thomas d'Aquin, Montreeal and Paris.Google Scholar
Rorty, A.O. (ed.), 1976: The identities of persons, Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, A.O. 1990: Persons and ‘personae’, in Gill, C. (ed.), The person and the human mind. Issues in ancient and modern philosophy, Oxford, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, J.B., 2001: The pre-palatial Bronze Age of the southern and central Greek mainland, in Cullen, T. (ed.), Aegean prehistory. A review, Boston, 95–156.Google Scholar
Sandel, M., 1982: Liberalism and the limits of justice, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schliemann, H., 1878: Mykenae. Bericht über meine Forschungen und Entdeckungen in Mykenae und Tiryns, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C., 1987: Reconstructing archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sherratt, E.S., 1990: ‘Reading the texts’. Archaeology and the Homeric question, Antiquity 64, 807–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, B., 1960: The discovery of the mind. The Greek origins of European thought, New York.Google Scholar
Strathern, M., 1988: The gender of the gift. Problems with women and problems with society in Melanesia, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarlow, S., 1999: Bereavement and commemoration. An archaeology of mortality, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tarlow, S., 2002: The aesthetic corpse in nineteenth-century Britain, in Hamilakis, Y., Pluciennik, M. and Tarlow, S. (eds), Thinking through the body. Archaeologies of corporeality, New York, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J., 1996: Time, culture and identity, London and New York.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 2001: Comment on ‘Monuments, power and personhood in the British Neolithic’ by J. Brück, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7 (4), 763–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J., 2002: Archaeology's humanism and the materiality of the body, in Hamilakis, Y., Pluciennik, M., and Tarlow, S. (eds), Thinking through the body. Archaeologies of corporeality, New York, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triantaphyllou, S., in press: Prospects for reconstructing the lives of Middle Helladic populations in the Argolid. Past and present of human bone studies, in Philippa-Touchais, A., Touchais, G., Voutsaki, S. and Wright, J. (eds), MESOHELLADIKA. The Greek mainland in the Middle Bronze Age, Paris (Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique, Supplément).Google Scholar
Ulf, C. (ed.) 2004: Der neue Streit um Troia. Eine Bilanz, Munich.Google Scholar
Ulf, C., 2009a: Rethinking cultural contacts, Ancient West & East 8, 81–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulf, C., 2009b: The world of Homer and Hesiod, in Raaflaub, K.A. and van Wees, H. (eds.), A companion to archaic Greece, Malden, MA and Oxford, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulf, C., and Rollinger, R. (eds.), forthcoming: Lag Troia in Kilikien? Die aktuelle Diskussion um Homers Ilias, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Van Gennep, A., 1960: The rites of passage, Chicago.Google Scholar
Van Wees, H., 1992. Status warrior. War, violence and society in Homer and history, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeule, E., 1975: The art of the shaft graves. Lectures in memory of Louise Taft Semple, Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P., 1988: Intimations of the will in Greek tragedy, in Vernant, J.-P. and Vidal-Naquet, P. (eds), Myth and tragedy in ancient Greece, New York.Google Scholar
Von Reden, S., 1995: Exchange in ancient Greece, London.Google Scholar
Voutsaki, S., 1995: Social and political processes in the Mycenaean Argolid. The evidence from the mortuary practices, in Laffineur, R. and Niemeier, W.-D., (eds) POLITEIA. Society and state in the Aegean Bronze Age, Liège (Aegaeum 12), 55–65.Google Scholar
Voutsaki, S., 1997: The creation of value and prestige in the Late Bronze Age Aegean, Journal of European archaeology 5, 34–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voutsaki, S., 1998: Mortuary evidence, symbolic meanings and social change. A comparison between Messenia and the Argolid in the Mycenaean period, in Branigan, K. (ed.), Cemetery and society in the Aegean Bronze Age, Sheffield, 41–58.Google Scholar
Voutsaki, S., 1999: Mortuary display, prestige and identity in the Shaft Grave Era, in Kilian-Dirlmeier, I. (eds), Eliten in der Bronzezeit. Ergebnisse zweier Kolloquien in Mainz und Athen, Mainz (Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, Monographien 43.1), 103–18.Google Scholar
Voutsaki, S., 2001: Economic control, power and prestige in the Mycenaean world. The archaeological evidence, in Voutsaki, S. and Killen, J. (eds), Economy and politics in the Mycenaean palace states, Cambridge (Cambridge Philological Society Supplementary Volume 27), 195–213.Google Scholar
Voutsaki, S., 2004: Age and gender in the southern Greek mainland, 2000–1500 BC. Ethnographisch-Archäologische Zeitung 45, 339–63.Google Scholar
Voutsaki, S., forthcoming: From value to meaning, from things to persons, in Urton, G. and Papadopoulos, J.K. (eds), The construction of value in the ancient world, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Voutsaki, S., in press: The domestic economy in the MH Asine, in Philippa-Touchais, A., Touchais, G., Voutsaki, S. and Wright, J. (eds), MESOHELLADIKA. The Greek Mainland in the Middle Bronze Age, Paris (Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique, Supplément).Google Scholar
Voutsaki, S., Ingvarsson-Sundström, A. and Richards, M., 2009: Project on the Middle Helladic Argolid. A report on the 2006 season, Pharos 14, 137–52.Google Scholar
Voutsaki, S., Dietz, S. and Nijboer, A.J., in press: Radiocarbon analysis and the history of the East Cemetery, Asine, Opuscula.Google Scholar
Voutsaki, S., Triantaphyllou, S., Ingvarsson-Sundström, A., Sarri, K., Richards, M., Nijboer, A.J., Kouidou-Andreou, S., Kovatsi, L., Nikou, D. and Milka, E., 2007: Project on the Middle Helladic Argolid. A report on the 2006 season, Pharos 13, 59–99.Google Scholar
Voutsakis, V., 2003: Introduction to the Greek translation of M. Walzer, Thick and thin. Moral argument at home and abroad, Athens, 9–71.Google Scholar
Walzer, M., 1994: Thick and thin. Moral argument at home and abroad, Notre Dame.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webmoore, T., and Witmore, C., 2008: Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social’ archaeology, Norwegian archaeological review 41, 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitridge, P., 2004: Landscapes, houses, bodies, things. ‘Place’ and the archaeology of Inuit imaginaries, Journal of archaeological method and theory 11, 213–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiessner, P., 1983: Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points, American antiquity 48, 253–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiessner, P., 1984: Reconsidering the behavioral basis for style. A case study among the Kalahari San, Journal of anthropological archaeology 3, 190–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B., 1993: Shame and necessity, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J.C., 1987: Death and power at Mycenae, in Laffineur, R. (ed.), Thanatos. Les coutumes funéraires en Egée à l'Age du Bronze, Liège (Aegaeum 1), 171–84.Google Scholar
Wright, J.C., 2004a: Mycenaean drinking service and standards of etiquette, in Barrett, J.C. and Halstead, P. (eds), Food, cuisine and society in prehistoric Greece, Oxford (Sheffield Studies in Aegean Archaeology 5), 90–104.Google Scholar
Wright, J.C., 2004b: The emergence of leadership and the rise of civilization in the Aegean, in Barrett, J.C. and Halstead, P. (eds), The emergence of civilisation revisited, Oxford (Sheffield Studies in Aegean Archaeology 6), 64–89.Google Scholar
Wright, J.C., 2008a: Chamber tombs, family, and state in Mycenaean Greece, in Gallou, C., Georgiadis, M. and Muskett, G. (eds), ΔΙΟΣΚΟΥΡΟΙ. Studies presented to Bill Cavanagh and Chris Mee for their contribution to Aegean archaeology, Oxford (British Archaeological Reports, International Series, 1889), 144–53.Google Scholar
Wright, J.C., 2008b: Early Mycenaean Greece, in Shelmerdine, C.W. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to the Aegean Bronze Age, New York, 230–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar