Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T02:17:28.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moulding analysis and architectural research: the late Middle Ages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2016

Eileen Roberts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mouldings as used in the medieval period can be described as contours applied to the salient parts of a building to give emphasis through light and shade.

It is significant that Robert Willis, whose writings set an unsurpassed standard for art historians, opened his important book on architectural nomenclature with a chapter on moulding terms, analysing William Worcestre’s drawing and its accompanying description. Willis used moulding data as long ago as 1845 to distinguish successive phases of building work in the nave of Winchester cathedral. The moulding surveys published soon after by the architect Edmund Sharpe proved exemplary both in quality of draughtsmanship and methodical approach. In the twentieth century W. R. Lethaby, aware of the value of moulding analysis, laid the foundation for recognizing individual styles in his two books on Westminster Abbey. He directly influenced Mr John Harvey, who collected the dated mouldings of one master mason, Henry Yeveley, and his associates, thus giving new direction to architectural studies. ‘Every historian of art who is concerned with Gothic’, wrote the late Paul Frankl in i960, ‘makes a note of the profiles.’

Type
Research Article
Information
Architectural History , Volume 20 , 1977 , pp. 5 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain 1977 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Pevsner, Nikolaus, Some Architectural Writers of the Nineteenth Century (Oxford 1972),p.54.Google Scholar
2Willis, (1844), p. 3. See also Harvey (1969), pp. 314 et seq. & 332-333.Google Scholar
3Willis, (1845), pp.60 et seq.Google Scholar
4Sharpe, (1848) and (1871-74).Google Scholar
5Lethaby, (1906), p. 131 and figs 50& 51. Idem (1925), pp. 90 et seq.Google Scholar
6Harvey, (1947a), p. 51. On the revised spelling of Yeveley see Harvey (1972), p. 15.Google Scholar
7Frankl, Paul, The Gothic (Princeton 1960), p. 819.Google Scholar
8Professor François Bucher has uncovered many hundreds of medieval architectural drawings in the libraries and archives of Europe, including working drawings. See ‘Design in Gothic Architecture: a Preliminary Assessment’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, xxvii (1968), pp.49–71. See also Harvey (1972), pp. 109 et seq.Google Scholar
9Shoe, Lucy T., Profiles of Greek Mouldings, 2 vols (Harvard 1936). Idem, ‘Profiles of Western Greek Mouldings’, American Academy in Rome Papers and Monographs, xiv (1952). Professor Rhys Carpenter, in The Architects of the Parthenon (Harmondsworth 1970), drew from her survey to identify separate styles of architects.Google Scholar
10Clarke, 1968, p. 11.Google Scholar
11Roberts, (1974), p. 68.Google Scholar
12Oldfield, L. H. G., ‘Hertfordshire Topography’, 9 vols (1794–1803), Hertford County Record Office. J. Buckler, ‘Architectural Drawings’ (mostly 1810-50), Hertfordshire, Vols IX-XII, BL Add. MSS 36364-36367. J. C. Buckler, ‘Views of Hertfordshire, a Collection of Drawings’, 4 vols, Hertford County Record Office.Google Scholar
13 See the illustrated list of words naming medieval mouldings recorded by the fifteenth-century antiquary, William Worcestre, in Harvey (1969), pp.314 et seq.Google Scholar
14 The base composed of bowtel-ogee is found at St Mary, Cheshunt, dated by an inscribed brass 1418-48, and on the Cornwallis tomb, in St Peter, Great Berkhamsted, dated 1544.Google Scholar
15 Salzman, (1967), pp. 123–124. Knoop, D. & Jones, G. P., The Medieval Mason (3rd edn, Manchester 1967), pp.70–71.Google Scholar
16Harvey (1947b), p. 127 and pls 143 & 144. In the design of stained glass windows cartoons were commonly reused: Salzman (1967), pp. 178–179, and Knowles, J. A., The York School of Glass-painting (London 1936), pp. II, 21, 22, 38.Google Scholar
17Letter to the author dated 23 August 1968. See also Harvey (1954), p.x.Google Scholar
18Roberts, (1972b), p. 122, fig. 2A and pl. XXVIA.Google Scholar
19Harvey, (1950), pp. 14 etseq.Google Scholar
20A particularly clear exposition of this technique in its strictest application is given by Sokal & Sneath in Principles of Numerical Taxonomy (San Francisco & London 1963).Google Scholar
21Clarke, (1968), p. 19.Google Scholar
22Roberts, (1974), p.76, table I.Google Scholar
23Roberts, (1974), p. 74, fig. 21.Google Scholar
24Roberts, (1972b), p. 119.Google Scholar
25Roberts, (1972a), pp. 24 & 34.Google Scholar
26Roberts, (1974), p. 66.Google Scholar
27Roberts, (1973), p. 119.Google Scholar