Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:09:18.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The universal availability of art publications: a global context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Philip Pacey
Philip Pacey*
Affiliation:
Lancashire Polytechnic, Preston
Get access

Abstract

‘Universal Availability of Publications’ (UAP) and the universal availability of art publications should be considered in the context of ‘one world’, a world in which we all share responsibility for our fellow human beings. In this context both librarianship and art, and thus art librarianship also, should be seen as services rendered to humankind at large. IFLA’s UAP programme has been conceived as a service, intended to supply genuine human needs, and art librarians, who are constantly frustrated in their efforts to serve users of art libraries by the limitations to the availability of art documentation, can readily identify a need for ‘Universal Availability of Art Publications’. Nevertheless, a worldwide programme of this nature is in danger, first, of being pursued for its own sake (or for the sake of ‘needs’ which are imagined, over-emphasised, or misconceived), and second, of reinforcing cultural imperialism. Safeguards include acceptance of the necessity to proceed step by step in pursuit of a success which can never be complete; the fact that UAP is founded on local collections developed to meet local needs; recognition of the imbalance in the production of publications in different parts of the world; and recognition of the importance of unpublished documentation and of ‘publications’ which do not as yet exist. A greater emphasis on increasing the availability, and generating the production, of publications from countries which publish relatively little, is proposed. A fourth safeguard ought to derive from the professional ethics and grass-roots experience of librarians, who serve and identify with library users, actual and potential. The pursuit of universal availability of art publications should be based on realistic assessment of what is feasible, and on local, regional, and national resources, with all possible encouragement being given to developing countries to document their own arts. Art librarians may be paying too little attention to the needs of users and, especially, of non-users of art libraries, and should be aware of the barriers to availability which can result from the prevalence of a narrow, elitist conception of ‘Art’ and from the provision of library services primarily for an elite. Without neglecting the service of scholarship, the art library profession should try to shift the balance of its commitment towards the provision of a service for everyone, everywhere, so that our interpretation and pursuit of the ‘Universal Availability of Art Publications’ truly reflects a vision of our whole world’s heritage and practice ‘of divers arts’.

This is the text of a paper presented to the Section of Art Libraries, at the 1985 IFLA Council in Chicago.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1985 , pp. 7 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Pacey, Philip. ‘Art as Service’Google Scholar
(2) I am indebted on this point to a paper by Thompson, Dixon, ‘Innovation or imitation: culture and control of technological change’(unpublished).Google Scholar
(3) MACY, Joanna Rogers. Despair and personal power in the nuclear age. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers. 1983.Google Scholar
(4) Speech delivered at the 25th anniversary of the Museum of Modern Art, New York; quoted in: HYATT, John. Art Wars (Rochdale, U.K.: Rochdale Art Gallery. 1984) in an essay which shows how post-war Britain and America promoted the ‘freedom of the artist’ as a ‘paradigm example of ‘freedom’ of the individual’ and as an ingredient in the make-up of the acceptable face of capitalism and post-colonial imperialism.Google Scholar
Similar ground is covered by: TAGG, John. ‘American power and American painting’. Praxis, vol. 1 no. 2, Winter 1976, pp. 59–79.Google Scholar
(5) IFLA. UAP: Universal Availability of Publications (Undated leaflet, c. 1980)Google Scholar
(6) KRAUTHAMMER, Charles. ‘Brave News World’. New Republic, March 14th 1981. p. 21: see SURPRENANT, Thomas T. and ZANDE, Jane. ‘The developing crisis in information: a librarian’s perspective’. IFLA Journal, 1983, vol. 9 no. 3, pp. 222–229.Google Scholar
(7) JANTJES, Gavin. ‘The words about us’. Art Libraries Journal, vol. 8 no. 4, Winter 1983, pp. 14–22.Google Scholar
(8) African films: the context of production. (BFI Dossier no. 6). London: British Film Institute, 1982.Google Scholar
(9) LEE, Dennis. ‘Cadence, Country, Silence: writing in colonial space’. Boundary 2 (Department of English, SUNY at Binghampton, N.Y. 13901), 1974, pp. 151–168.Google Scholar
BEATTIE, Eleanor. A handbook of Canadian film. Toronto: Peter Martin Associates. 1973.Google Scholar
BERTON, Pierre. Hollywood’s ‘Canada’: the Americanization of our national image. Toronto: McLelland and Stewart, 1975.Google Scholar
HINDE, John. Other people’s pictures. Carlton (Australia): Pitman, 1981.Google Scholar
SINGER, Loren. ‘Canadian art publications: history and recent developments’. Art Libraries Journal, vol. 8 no. I. Spring 1983. pp. 4–37.Google Scholar
(10) IFLA, op. cit.Google Scholar
(11) PIIILLPOT, Clive. ‘The Social Role of the Art Library”. Art Documentation, vol. 2 no. 6. December 1983. p. 177: reprinted in A Reader in Art Librarianship. Munich: K.G. Saur. 1985 pp. 112–115.Google Scholar
(12) JOHN, Magnus. ‘The aesthetics of the vital arts: some images from Black Africa and the Caribbean’. Paper presented to the IFLA Section of Art Libraries. IFLA Conference, Nairobi, 1984.Google Scholar
(13) PACEY, Philip. ‘Family Art: domestic and eternal bliss’. Journal of Popular Culture, vol. 18 no. 1, Summer 1984, pp. 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14) PACEY, Philip. ‘The poor man’s Claude Lorraine: the picturesque landscape and the consumer revolution’.Google Scholar
(15) See: PACEY, Arnold. ‘Vision and Design’. Paper received by the IFLA Section of Art Libraries, IFLA Conference, Nairobi, 1984.Google Scholar
(16) See: Art Libraries Journal, Winter 1981, vol. 6 no. 3; also Helle Behrndt’s contribution to A Reader in Art Librarianship (Munich: K.G. Saur. 1985); also Honningpumpen (formerly Medd. Blade), passim.Google Scholar
(17) PATZ, Gerd-Peter. ‘Artotheken im Aufwind 2. Fortbildungs-seminar “Kunstausleihe und Bildereien” in Koln’. Buck und Bibliotek, vol. 35 nos. 7/8, 1983, pp. 582–587.Google Scholar
BEHRNDT, Helle. ‘Artothcks in West Germany’. IFLA Section of Art Libraries Newsletter, no. 12, January 1985. pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
(18) ‘Rabota i problemi v otdelite ‘lzkustvo’’. Bibliotekar (Sofia), vol. 29 no. 9. 1982. pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
(19) RIVIERE, Georges Henri; quoted in: WATSON, Mark. ‘Ecomusées’. Design History Society Newsletter, no. 22, July 1984, pp. 26–28.Google Scholar
(20) PHILLPOT, .op. cit.Google Scholar
(21) LICHTEN, Frances. ‘Art libraries and librarians: observations of a user’. Special Libraries, no. 50, 1959. pp. 102–105: reprinted in A Reader in Art Librarianship. Munich: K.G. Saur. 1985. pp. 37–41.Google Scholar
(22) PHILLPOT, . op. cit.Google Scholar
(23) MACY, . op. cit.Google Scholar
(24) JANTJES, Gavin. ‘Developing an art for life’s sake’. Paper received by the IFLA Section of Art Libraries at the IFLA Conference, Nairobi, 1984.Google Scholar