Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:16:21.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing Risk Adjusted Premiums from the Reinsurance Point of View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

João Manuel Andrade e Silva  and
Maria de Lourdes Centeno
João Manuel Andrade e Silva*
Affiliation:
ISEG, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal
Maria de Lourdes Centeno
Affiliation:
ISEG, Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal
*
Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, Rua do Quelhas, 6, 1200 Lisboa, Portugal, email:joaoas@iseg.utl.pt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we compare, from the point of view of reinsurance, the several risk adjusted premium calculation principles considered in Wang (1996b). We conclude that, with the exception of the proportional hazard (PH) premium calculation principle, all the others behave in a way similar to the expected value principle. We prove that the stop loss reinsurance premium when calculated using the PH premium principle gives a higher premium than any of the other transforms, provided that the priority is big enough. We observe a similar behaviour with respect to excess of loss reinsurance in all the examples given.

We also study the behaviour of the adjustment coefficient, both from the insurer's and the reinsurer's point of view as functions of the priority, when the PH principle is used as opposed to the expected value principle.

Keywords

PH-transformrisk adjusted premiumreinsuranceadjustment coefficient
Type
Articles
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , November 1998 , pp. 221 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 1998

References

Daykin, C.D., Pentikäinen, T. and Pesonen, E. (1994). Practical Risk Theory for Actuaries, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Gerathewohl, K. (1980). Reinsurance Principles and Practice, Vol. 1, Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft e. V., Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Kaas, R., Van Heerwaarden, A. and Goovaerts, M. (1994). Ordering of actuarial risks, Education Series I, CAIRE, Brussels.Google Scholar
Wang, S. (1995). Insurance pricing and increased limits ratemaking by proportional hazards transforms, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 17:43–54.Google Scholar
Wang, S. (1996a). Ordering of risks under ph-transforms, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 18:109–114.Google Scholar
Wang, S. (1996b). Premium calculation by transforming the layer premium density, ASTIN Bulletin 26: 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, H. (1983). Some mathematical aspects of reinsurance, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 2:17–26.Google Scholar