Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:29:58.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost-of-Capital Margin for a General Insurance Liability Runoff

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2013

Robert Salzmann  and
Mario V. Wüthrich
Robert Salzmann
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Department of Mathematics, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Mario V. Wüthrich
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Department of Mathematics, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under new solvency regulations, general insurance companies need to calculate a risk margin to cover possible shortfalls in their liability runoff. A popular approach for the calculation of the risk margin is the so-called cost-of-capital approach. A comprehensive cost-of-capital approach involves the consideration of multiperiod risk measures. Because multiperiod risk measures are rather complex mathematical objects, various proxies are used to estimate this risk margin. Of course, the use of proxies and the study of their quality raises many questions, see IAA position paper [8]. In the present paper we provide a first discourse on multiperiod solvency considerations for a general insurance liability runoff. Within a chain ladder framework, we derive analytic formulas for the risk margin which allow to compare the comprehensive approach to the different proxies used in practice. Moreover, a case study investigates and answers questions raised in [8].

Keywords

Solvencyrisk margincost-of-capital approachmultiperiod risk measurerisk bearing capitalgeneral insurance runoffclaims reservingoutstanding loss liabilitiesclaims development resultchain ladder model
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , November 2010 , pp. 415 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] AISAM-ACME (2007) AISAM-ACME study on non-life long tail liabilities. Reserve risk and risk margin assessment under Solvency II. October 17, 2007.Google Scholar
[2] Bühlmann, H., De Felice, M., Gisler, A., Moriconi, F. and Wüthrich, M.V. (2009) Recursive credibility formula for chain ladder factors and the claims development result. Astin Bulletin 39(1), 275–306.Google Scholar
[3] Bühlmann, H. and Gisler, A. (2005) A Course in Credibility Theory and its Applications. Springer.Google Scholar
[4] De Felice, M. and Moriconi, F. (2003) Risk based capital in P&C loss reserving or stressing the triangle. Research Group on “Insurance Companies and Pension Funds”, Working Paper n. 1, Rome, December 2003.Google Scholar
[5] Föllmer, H. and Penner, I. (2006) Convex risk measures and the dynamics of their penalty functions. Statistics & Decision 24, 61–96.Google Scholar
[6] Gerber, H.U. and Jones, D.A. (1975) Credibility formulas of the updating type. In Kahn, P.M. (ed.), Credibility: Theory and Applications. Academic Press.Google Scholar
[7] Gisler, A. and Wüthrich, M.V. (2008) Credibility for the chain ladder reserving method. Astin Bulletin 38(2), 565–597.Google Scholar
[8] International Actuarial Association IAA (2009). Measurement of liabilities for insurance contracts: current estimates and risk margins. Available under www.actuaries.org Google Scholar
[9] ISVAP (2006) Reserve requirements and capital requirements in non-life insurance. An analysis of the Italian MTPL insurance market by stochastic claims reserving models. Report prepared by De Felice, M., Moriconi, F., Matarazzo, L., Cavastracci, S. and Pasqualini, S., Rome, October 2006.Google Scholar
[10] Kremer, E. (1982) Credibility for some evolutionary models. Scand. Act. J. 1982 (3-4), 129–142.Google Scholar
[11] Mack, T. (1993) Distribution-free calculation of the standard error of chain ladder reserves estimates. Astin Bulletin 23(2), 213–225.Google Scholar
[12] Mack, T. (1994) Measuring the variability of chain ladder reserve estimates. Casualty Actuarial Society Forum 1, Spring 1994, 101–182.Google Scholar
[13] Merz, M. and Wüthrich, M.V. (2008) Modelling the claims development result for solvency purposes. CAS E-Forum, Fall 2008, 542–568.Google Scholar
[14] Møller, T. (2001) On transformations of actuarial valuation principles. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 28, 281–303.Google Scholar
[15] Ohlsson, E. and Lauzeningks, J. (2009) The one-year non-life insurance risk. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 45, 203–208.Google Scholar
[16] Pelsser, A. (2010) Time-consistent and market-consistent actuarial valuations. Preprint.Google Scholar
[17] Sandström, A. (2006) Solvency: Models, Assessment and Regulation. Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
[18] Sundt, B. (1981) Recursive credibility estimation. Scand. Act. J. 1981 (1), 3–21.Google Scholar
[19] Swiss Solvency Test (2006) FINMA SST Technisches Dokument, Version 2. October 2006. Available under www.finma.ch Google Scholar
[20] Wüthrich, M.V., Bühlmann, H. and Furrer, H. (2008) Market-Consistent Actuarial Valuation. Springer.Google Scholar
[21] Wüthrich, M.V. and Bühlmann, H. (2008) The one-year runoff uncertainty for discounted claims reserves. Giornale dell Istituto Italiano degli Attuari, LXXI (2008), 1–37.Google Scholar
[22] Wüthrich, M.V. (2010) Accounting year effects modelling in the stochastic chain ladder reserving method. North American Actuarial Journal 14(2), 235–255.Google Scholar