Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:48:37.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

USING WEIGHTED DISTRIBUTIONS TO MODEL OPERATIONAL RISK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2016

Lourdes B. Afonso  and
Pedro Corte Real
Lourdes B. Afonso*
Affiliation:
Centro de Matemática e Aplicações, CMA, Faculdade Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
Pedro Corte Real
Affiliation:
Depart. de Matemática, Faculdade Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal E-Mail: parcr@fct.unl.pt
*
E-Mail: lbafonso@fct.unl.pt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The quantification of operational risk has to deal with various concerns regarding data, much more than other types of risk which banks and insurers are obliged to manage. One of the main questions that worries both researchers and practitioners is the bias in the data on the operational losses amounts recorded. We support the assertions made by several authors and defend that this concern is serious when modeling operational losses data and, typically, is presented in all the databases. We show that it's possible, based on mild assumptions on the internal procedures put in place to manage operational losses, to make parametric inference using loss data statistics, that is, to estimate the parameters for the losses amounts, taking in consideration the bias that, not being considered, generates a two fold error in the estimators for the mean loss amount and the total loss amount, the former being overvalued and the last undervalued. In this paper, we do not consider the existence of a threshold for which, all losses above, are reported and available for analysis and estimation procedures. In this sense, we follow a different approach to the parametric inference. Here, we consider that the probability that a loss is reported and ends up recorded for analysis, increases with the size of the loss, what causes the bias in the database but, at the same time, we do not consider the existence of a threshold, above which, all losses are recorded. Hence, no loss has probability one of being recorded, in what we defend is a realist framework. We deduce the general formulae, present simulations for common theoretical distributions used to model (operational reported) losses amounts, estimate the impact for not considering the bias factor when estimating the value at risk and estimate the true total operational losses the bank incurred.

Keywords

Operational riskloss databiasweighted distributionsvalue at risk
Type
Research Article
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 469 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © Astin Bulletin 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M. and Heath, D. (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9 (3), 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böcker, K. and Klüppelberg, C. (2005) Operational VAR: A closed-form approximation. Risk, 18 (12), 90–93.Google Scholar
Chapelle, A., Crama, Y., Hubner, G. and Peters, J. (2005) Measuring and managing operational risk in the finantial sector: An integrated framework. Technical report, National Bank of Belgium.Google Scholar
Chernobai, A., Rachev, S.T. and Fabozzi, F. (2007) Operational Risk: A Guide to Basel II Capital Requirements, Models, and Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Cruz, M.G. (2002) Modeling, Measuring and Hedging Operational Risk. John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chichester.Google Scholar
Cummins, J.D., Lewis, C.M. and Wei, R. (2004) The market value impact of operational risk events for u.s. banks an insurers. Technical report, University of Pennsylvania.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsson, J., Jorgensen, B. N., Mandira, S., Samorodnitsky, G. and De Vries, C. G. (2005) Subadditivity re–examined: the case for value-at-risk. Financial Markets Group, FMG Discussion Papers, dp549.Google Scholar
de Fontnouvelle, P., Jordan, J. and Rosengren, E. (2003) Using loss data to quantify operational risk. SSRN Electronic Journal.Google Scholar
de Fontnouvelle, P., Jordan, J. and Rosengren, E. (2005) Implications of alternative operational risk modeling techniques. Working Paper 11103, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Degen, M. (2010) The calculation of minimum regulatory capital using single-loss approximations. Journal of Operational Risk, 5 (4), 3–17.Google Scholar
Dutta, K. and Perry, J. (2007) An empirical analysis of loss distribution models for estimating operational risk capital. Working paper no. 06–13, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.Google Scholar
Embrechts, P., Degen, M. and Lambrigger, D.D. (2007) The quantitative modeling of operational risk: between g-and-h and evt. ASTIN Bulletin, 37 (2), 265–291.Google Scholar
Fisher, R.A. (1934) The effects of methods of ascertainment upon the estimation of frequencies. Annals Eugenics, (6), 13–25.Google Scholar
Moscadelli, M. (2004) The modelling of operational risk: Experience with the analysis of the data collected by basel committee. Technical report, Bank of Italy.Google Scholar
Patil, G. and Rao, C. (1977) Weighted distributions: A survey of their application. Applications of Statistics, 383–405.Google Scholar
Patil, G. P. and Rao, C. R. (1978) Weighted distributions and size-biased sampling with applications to wildlife populations and human families. Biometrics, 34 (2), 179–189.Google Scholar
Perry, J. and Fontnouvelle, P. (2005) Measuring reputational risk: The market reactions to operational loss announcements. Technical report, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachev, S. and Mittnik, S. (2000) Stable Paretian models in Finance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rao, C. (1965) On discrete distributions arising out of methods of ascertainment. Sankhyã: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 27 (2/4), 311–324.Google Scholar
Sarndal, C., Swensson, B. and Wretman, J. (2003) Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Shih, J., Samad-Khan, A.J. and Medapa, P. (2000) Is the size of an operational risk related to firm size? Operational Risk Magazine, February, 2000.Google Scholar