Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:25:54.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Application of the Distar Language 1 Programme in an Infants E.S.L. setting: Comparison with a current E.S.L. Programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Dianna Kenny
Dianna Kenny*
Affiliation:
Division of Guidance and Special Education, N.S.W. Department of Education
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Programmes for teaching English as a second language (E.S.L.) to infant school aged migrant children in Australia have not been systematically evaluated. With the exception of the Tate “Oral English” Course, no other programmes have been specifically designed for this very young age group, and programmes designed for use with primary aged children and even adults have been adapted and used by E.S.L. teachers in Infants’ Schools. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate an E.S.L. programme currently operating in some Infants’ Schools as well as to implement and evaluate the use of the Distar Language 1 programme in an E.S.L. Kindergarten group, and to compare outcomes from this programme with those obtained by the currently operating programme.

Results indicate that the Distar Language 1 programme was more effective than the standard programme for all language structures other than vocabulary development and phonological discrimination. The superior outcome of the Distar programme may be due to either a programme effect, a behavioural teaching technology, or both.

Type
Research and Review
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , May 1980 , pp. 9 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anastasi, A. (1949) Some Implications of Cultural Factors for Test Construction in Testing Problems in Perspective. Ed. Anastasi, A., American Council on Education, 1966.Google Scholar
Australian Department of Education: Report of the Inquiry into Schools of High Migrant Density: 1974. Study based on schools selected in N.S.W. and Victoria. Canberra, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Audtralian Department of Education: Inquiry into Schools of High Migrant Density: 1974. Study based on schools selected in N.S.W. and Victoria. Aust. Gov’t. Publishing Service, 1975.Google Scholar
Baldie, B. Brian Baldie’s Language Ability Tests. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Macquarie University 1979.Google Scholar
Baldie, B. &. Maggs, A. Experimental Research and its implications for the Development of a Teaching Model in Language. Paper presented at the 1st symposium on the Teaching of Language and Reading, Sponsored by the N.S.W. Higher Education Board’s Committee of Inquiry into Special Education, 1978.Google Scholar
Bauer, E.W. Consultation Report: The Migrant and the School. Canberra: Australian Frontier, Inc., 1972.Google Scholar
Becker, W.C. & Camine, D.W. Direct Instruction – A Behaviour Theory Based Model for Comprehensive Educational Intervention with the Disadvantaged. Paper presented at the VIII Symposium on Behaviour Modification, Caracas, Venezuela, 1978.Google Scholar
Becker, W.C. & Engelmann, S. The Direct Instruction Model In Rhine, R. (Ed.) Encouraging Change in America’s Schools: a decade of experimentation. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. The Acquisition of the System of Negation in Children’s Speech. Thesis, Harvard University, 1967.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C. &Englemann, S. Teaching Disadvantaged Children in the pre-school. Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
Berko, J. The Child’s Learning of English Morphology. Word, 1958, 14, 150–177.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. Social Class and Linguistic Development: A Theory of Social Learning. In Halsey, A.A. Floud, J. Anderson, C.A. (Eds.), Education, Economy and Society. New York: Free Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. Outline Guide for the Practical Study of Foreign Languages, in Lugton, R.C. & Heinle, C.H. (Eds.), 1971: Toward a Cognitive Approach to Second Language Acquisition. Philadelphia, Pa.: The Center for Curriculum Development, Inc.Google Scholar
Boehm, A.E. Boehm Test of Basic Concepts. Psychological Corporation, New York, 1967, 1971.Google Scholar
Brooks, N. Language and Language Learning. New York: Harcourt Brace and World, 2nd ed., 1964.Google Scholar
Brown, R. & Bellugi, U. Three Processes in the Child’s Acquisition of Syntax, Harvard Educational Review. 34(2), 1964, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. & Stanley, I. Experimental & Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Rand, McNally &Co., Chicago, 1971.Google Scholar
Chastain, K. The Development of Modern Language Skills: Theory to Practice. Philadelphia, Pa.: The Center for Curriculum Development, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. Review of Skinner, B.F., Verbal Behaviour. Language, 1959, 35, 26–58.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. Linguistic Theory. In Mead, Robert C. Jr. (Ed.), Reports of the Working Committees, Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. New York: MLA Materials Centre, 1966.Google Scholar
Christophersen, P. Second Language Learning; Myth & Reality. Penguin Education, 1973.Google Scholar
Clark, D.C. Teaching Concepts in the Classroom: A Set of Teaching Prescriptions derived from Experimental Research. Educational Psych. Monograph, 1971, 62(3), 253–278.Google Scholar
Congalton, A.A. Status and Prestige in Australia. Melbourne, Chesire, 1969.Google Scholar
Dailey Language Facility Test. The George Washington University, Washington D.C., 1967.Google Scholar
Dulay, H.C. & Burt, M.K. Errors and Strategies in Child Second Language Acquisition: TESOL Quarterly, 1974, 8(2), 129–136.Google Scholar
Dunn, L.M. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. American Guidance Service, Inc. 1959, 1965.Google Scholar
Engelmann, S. Preventing Failure in the Primary Grades. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1969.Google Scholar
Engelmann, S. & Osborn, J. Distar Language 1. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1976.Google Scholar
Ervin, S.M. Imitation and Structural Change in Children’s Language, in Lenneberg, E.H. (Ed.): Directions in the Study of Language. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Fodor, J., Bever, T., Garrett, M. An Introduction into Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar. McGraw Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
Foster, R., Giddan, J.J., & Stark, J. Assessment of Children’s Language Comprehension. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., 1973.Google Scholar
Haring, N.G. & Bateman, B. Teaching the Learning Disabled Child. Prentice Hall, Inc., Engelwood Cliffs N.J., 1977.Google Scholar
Kenny, D.T. Applied Behavioural Analysis in Educational Settings: A Critical Review of the Role of Academic Material and its Contingent Reinforcement in Eliminating Disruptive Behaviour in the Classroom. Special, 1979, 14, 18–24.Google Scholar
Maggs, A., Moore, J. & Baldie, B. Direct Instruction, Generalization and Learning Problems. Technical Report for Dept. of Aboriginal Affairs, 1978.Google Scholar
Meddleton, I.G. Learning Problems Associated with Non-English Speaking Migrant Children in Australia. Forum of Education, 1960, 19, 41–47.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. The Acquisition and Development of Language. Prentice Hall Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
Nichols, O. The Language Problems of Migrant Children. Background Paper, Australian Citizenship Convention, Canberra, 1970, 5–8.Google Scholar
Nucifora, G. Unpublished B.A.(Hons) Thesis, Macquarie University, 1975.Google Scholar
Pittman, G. Teaching Structural English. London: Ginn & Co., 1967.Google Scholar
Politzer, R.L. Linguistics and Applied Linguistics: Aims and Methods. Philsdelphia, Pa.: The Center for Curriculum Development, Inc., 1972.Google Scholar
Raven, J.C. The Coloured Progressive Matrices, Sets A, Ab, B. London: H.K. Lewis & Co., 1965.Google Scholar
Richards, J.C. Error Analysis and Second Language Strategies. Language Sciences, 17, 1971, 12–22.Google Scholar
Richards, J.C. Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. London: Longman Group Ltd., 1974.Google Scholar
Saporta, S. Applied Linguistics and Generative Grammar, in Richards, J.C. (Ed.), 1974: Error Analysis: Perspectives on Language Acquisition. London: Longman Group Ltd., 1966.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. Foundations for Teaching English as a Second Language. Engelwood Cliffs N.Y.: Prentice Hall, 1976.Google Scholar
Simoes, A. (Ed.) The Bilingual Child. Academic Press, Inc., 1976.Google Scholar
Skinner, B.F. Verbal Behaviour. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.Google Scholar
Smolicz, J.J. & Wiseman, R. European Migrants and their Children: Interaction, Assimilation, Education. Quarterly Review of Australian Education: 1971, 4(2), 2–43.Google Scholar
Tate, G. Oral English: Handbook. Wellington, Reed Education, 1971.Google Scholar
Tenezakis, M.D. Later Development of English with and without Another Language. Evidence from Testing English Monoglot and Greek Speaking Children in Sydney. Research Report, Macquarie University, 1977.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D.A. Linguistics in Language Teaching. London: Arnold, 1972.Google Scholar