Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:58:16.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Issues in the Suspension and Exclusion of Disruptive Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Alan Bain*
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia

Abstract

This paper will address issues associated with the use of suspension and exclusion as an intervention for dealing with disruptive behaviour in schools, with a particular focus on secondary students in Western Australia. There is increasing support for the view that many of the students suspended or excluded from school for disruptive behaviour may be socially/emotionally handicapped and as such are being denied access to an appropriate education on the basis of their handicapping condition. The legal and service delivery implications of this position are discussed within the context of current Australian special education policy and international agreements pertaining to the educational rights of children.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Airlines of NSW Proprietry Limited v New South Wales 113, CLR 54, (1965).Google Scholar
Apter, S.J. & Close Conoley, J. (1984). Childhood behaviour disorders and emotional disturbance: An introduction to teaching troubled children. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar
Ashby, G. & Taylor, J. (1984). Response to policies: Review of Commonwealth Schools Commission Special Education Program. Canberra: Commonwealth Schools Commission.Google Scholar
Birch, I.K.F. (1983). Education and the external affairs power: Implications for the governance of Australian schools. Australian Journal of Education, 27(3), 234–248.Google Scholar
Boer, B. & Gleeson, V. (1982). The law of education. Sydney: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Schools Commission (1985). Report of the working party on special education on commonwealth policy and directions in special education. Canberra: Commonwealth Schools Commission.Google Scholar
Commonwealth v Tasmania, 46, ALR 625, (1983).Google Scholar
Cullinan, D. & Epstein, M.H. (1986). Legal decisions and appropriate education of seriously emotionally disturbed (SED) students. Journal of Special Education, 20(2), 265–272.Google Scholar
Docking, J.W. (1980). Control and discipline in schools: Perspectives and approaches. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Education Support Branch (1986). Service figures. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Frude, N. & Gault, H. (1984). Disruptive behaviour in schools. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Grosenick, J.K. & Huntze, S.L. (1980). National needs analysis in behavior disorders. Columbia: University of Missouri-Columbia, Department of Special Education.Google Scholar
Gross, B. & Gross, R. (1977). The children’s rights movement. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hardman, M.L., Drew, C.J., & Egan, M.W. (1984). Human exceptionality: Society, school and family. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Heward, W.L. & Orlansky, M.D. (1984). Exceptional children (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH.: Merrill.Google Scholar
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act No. 125, 1986.Google Scholar
Hyde, N. & Robson, G. (1984). A study of student suspensions: Discussion paper 21. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.Google Scholar
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966). UN GAOR Supp(No. 16) at 49, UN Doc. A/6316.Google Scholar
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965). UN GAOR, Supp (No. 14), at 47, UN Doc A/6104.Google Scholar
Kauffman, J.M. (1985). Characteristics of children’s behavior disorders (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
Special Education Training Conference. Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Keilitz, I. (1984, April). The handicapped youthful offender: Prevalence and current practices. Paper presented at the Corrections/Special Education Training Conference. Arlington, V.A. Google Scholar
King v Burgess, 55, CLR 608, (1936).Google Scholar
Koowarta v Bjelke-Petersen, 39, ALR 417, (1982).Google Scholar
Leone, P. (1985). Suspension and expulsion of handicapped pupils. The Journal of Special Education, 19(1), 111–121.Google Scholar
Levin, B. (1985). Equal educational opportunity for children with special needs: The federal role in Australia. Law and Contemporary Problems, 47(4), 1301–1358.Google Scholar
Louden, L.W. (1985). Disruptive behaviour in schools: Report of the Ministerial Working Party appointed by the Minister for Education and Planning in Western Australia. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Lumb, R. & Ryan, K. (1974). The constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia: Annotated. Sydney: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Miller, L.J. & McCauley, K.C. (1987). E. I. and the socially maladjusted: A need for action. Benchmark, 2(1), 17–21.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education, Western Australia. (1987). Guidelines for student exclusion panels. Perth: Ministry of Education, Western Australia.Google Scholar
Neal, D. (1982). The right to education: The case of special education. The Australian Quarterly, Winter, 147160.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education. (1985). Seventh annual report to congress on the implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Rehabilitative Services.Google Scholar