Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:06:40.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ancient natural philosophy: A resource for environmental education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2020

Ann Van Ryn Open the ORCID record for Ann Van Ryn [Opens in a new window]  and
Edgar Burns Open the ORCID record for Edgar Burns [Opens in a new window]
Ann Van Ryn
Affiliation:
Department of Social Inquiry, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Edgar Burns*
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, Chair of Integrated Catchment Management, University of Waikato, Napier, New Zealand
*
*Corresponding author. Email: edgar.burns@waikato.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studying humankind’s relationship to the earth involves broad and deep questions for students as today’s educators explore changing teaching methods. This article highlights benefits of a multidisciplinary approach to environmental education, drawing upon ancient natural philosophy as a coherent conceptual resource. The Greek philosopher Plotinus is introduced to show the application of ancient natural philosophy across all fields and on all levels of knowledge under a common banner. The significance of ancient natural philosophy is its conception of overall unity. This is the key. Unity is implicit in interrelationships between parts to whole on all levels of existence. From such a perspective, all life forms and other entities in the natural world can be understood as interrelated — just as James Lovelock demonstrated in describing the homeostatic state of natural processes on earth. On a similar reasoning, the diversity in people, societies and places can be appreciated physically and sociologically as belonging to one world. Several studies are cited to explore this overlap between ancient natural philosophy and honouring the connection and dependence of humanity on the fragility of the earth’s ecosystem.

Keywords

GaiahomeostasisLovelocknatureNeoplatonismnoêtic unityphilosophyPlotinus
Type
Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 81 - 89
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alliez, E. (2004). The signature of the world, or, what is Deleuze and Guattari’s philosophy. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (2006). The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A.H. (1949). The real meaning of Plotinus’s intelligible world. Oxford, UK: Blackfriars.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A.H. (1940). The architecture of the intelligible universe in the philosophy of Plotinus. Ann Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blok, A., & Jensen, C.B. (2019). The Anthropocene event in social theory: on ways of problematizing nonhuman materiality differently. The Sociological Review, doi: 10.1177/0038026119845551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrigan, K. (2004). An ecological ethos in pre-Socratic thinking. The Structurist, 44–44, 11–17.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. (2005). Reading Plotinus: A practical introduction to Neoplatonism. West Lafayette: IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Corrigan, K. (2009). Ecology’s future debt to Plotinus and Neoplatonism. In Vassilopoulou, P. & Clark, S.R.L. (Eds.), Late antique epistemology (pp. 250–272). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrigan, K. (2014). Humans, other animals, plants and the question of the good: The Platonic and Neoplatonic traditions. In Remes, P. & Slaveva-Griffin, S. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Neoplatonism (pp. 372–390). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deck, J. (1991). Nature, contemplation and The One. Burdett, NY: Larson.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987/2007). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Enting, I. (2012, February 12). Gaia: Is it science yet? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/gaia-theory-is-it-science-yet-4901Google Scholar
Fideler, D. (2014). Restoring the soul of the world. Toronto, ON: Inner Traditions.Google Scholar
Gasché, R. (2014). Geophilosophy: On Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s What is Philosophy? Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, L.P. (2004). The Unity of Intellect in Aristotle’s ‘De Anima’. Phronesis, 49, 348–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guénon, R. (2004). The multiple states of the being. (Trans. Fohr, H.D.). Ed. Fohr, S.D.. New York, NY: Sophia Perennis.Google Scholar
Guénon, R. (2007). Oriental metaphysics. In Oldmeadow, H. (Ed.). Light from the East. Bloomington, IN: World Wisdom.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1993). Plotinus or the simplicity of vision (Trans. Chase, M.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hankins, T.L. (1985). Science and the Enlightenment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jickling, B., Blenkinsop, S., Morse, M., & Jensen, A. (2018). Wild pedagogies: Six initial touchstones for early childhood environmental educators. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 34, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, M.A. (2014). On ‘Logos’ in Heraclitus. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 47, 2–29.Google Scholar
Kettleborough, H.M. (2019). Gaia’s graveyards–bearing witness as first person inquiry. Action Research, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, T., & Owen, J. (2019). Posthuman phenomenologies: Performance philosophy, non-human animals, and the landscape. Qualitative Inquiry. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/1077800419836694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovelock, J. (1988). The ages of Gaia. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. (1991). Healing Gaia: Practical medicine for the planet. New York, NY: Harmony Books.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. (1995). Gaia, a new look at life on earth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. (2006). The revenge of Gaia. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. (2009). The vanishing face of Gaia: A final warning. London, UK: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
May, T., & Semetsky, I. (2008). Deleuze, ethical education, and the unconscious. In Semetsky, I. (Ed.). Nomadic education: Variations on a theme by Deleuze and Guattari (pp. 141–157). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Naess, A. (1995). Self-realization: an ecological approach to being in the world. In Sessions, G. (Ed.), Deep ecology for the twenty-first century (pp. 222–239). Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
Naess, A. (2011). The deep ecological movement: Some philosophical aspects. In Bhaskar, R., Naess, P., & Georg, K. (Eds.), Ecophilosophy in a world of crisis (pp. 404–415). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Naess, A., with Jickling, B. (2000). Deep ecology and education: A conversation with Arne Naess. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 46–62.Google Scholar
Olsson, L. (2009). Movement and experimentation in young children’s learning: Deleuze and Guattari in early childhood education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piersol, L., Russell, L., & Groves, J. (2018). Nature education for sustainable todays and tomorrows (NEST): Hatching a new culture in schooling. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 34, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, J. (2008). Kuhn’s ‘The structure of scientific revolutions’. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Quarshie, A., Salmi, A., & Wu, Z. (2019). From equivocality to reflexivity in biodiversity protection. Organization & Environment. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/1086026619837122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe, C., Parissi, C., & Raman, A. (2016). Valuing indigenous knowledge in the highlands of Papua New Guinea: A model for agricultural and environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 242–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrimshire, S. (2018). Deep time and secular time: A critique of the environmental ‘long view’. Theory, Culture & Society, 36. 10.1177/0263276418777307Google Scholar
Smith, T. (2018). Sustainability, wellbeing and the posthuman turn. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vetlesen, A. (2015). The denial of nature: environmental philosophy in the era of global capitalism. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar