Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:52:12.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A critical analysis of ecological sustainability ideology in award-winning early children’s literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2020

Peta J. White Open the ORCID record for Peta J. White [Opens in a new window] ,
Glenn Auld Open the ORCID record for Glenn Auld [Opens in a new window]  and
Muriel Wells
Peta J. White*
Affiliation:
School of Education, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
Glenn Auld
Affiliation:
School of Education, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
Muriel Wells
Affiliation:
School of Education, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: peta.white@deakin.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A framework to critically consider the ecological sustainability messaging in children’s literature is presented to authors, illustrators and editors, as well as teachers, parents and students/children. We have applied this framework to three books from the Children’s Book Council of Australia (CBCA) 2015 Notables list using critical discourse analysis (CDA). Findings suggest that there are themes and images in these award-winning texts that do not support ecological sustainability and we argue that children’s literature should be judged with criteria including ecological sustainability. Our hope is that ecological sustainability principles and practices lead to changes in social discourse through intergenerational storytelling.

Keywords

ecological sustainabilitychildren’s literaturecritical discourse analysiseducation for sustainabilitypillars of sustainability
Type
Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , July 2021 , pp. 147 - 158
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This manuscript is an original work that has not been submitted to nor published anywhere else.

References

Angus, I. (2015). When did the anthropocene begin… and why does it matter. Monthly Review, 67(4). Retrieved from https://monthlyreview.org/2015/09/01/when-did-the-anthropocene-beginand-why-does-it-matter/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016). Cross-curriculum priorities. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/crosscurriculumpriorities/overview/introduction Google Scholar
Australian Government. (2009). Living Sustainably: The Australia Government’s National Action Plan for Education for Sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/13887ab8-7e03-4b3e-82bb-139b2205a0af/files/national-action-plan.pdf Google Scholar
Babb, Y.M., McBurnie, J., & Miller, K.K. (2017). Tracking the environment in Australian children’s literature: The Children’s Book Council of Australia Picture Book of the Year Awards 1955-2014. Environmental Education Research, 24(5), 716–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. (2016). Circle. London, UK: Walker Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Baratz, L., & Hazeira, H.A. (2012). Children’s literature as an important tool for education of sustainability and the environment. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 2(1), 31–36.Google Scholar
Barnes, M., Moore, D., & Almeida, S. (2019). Sustainability in Australian schools: A cross-curriculum priority? Prospects, 47, 377–392. doi: 10.1007/s11125-018-9437-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Base, G. (2006). Uno’s garden. New York, NY: Abrams Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
Bigger, S., & Webb, J. (2010). Developing environmental agency and engagement through young people’s fiction. Environmental Education Research, 16(3–4), 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V.K., Flowerdew, , J., & Jones, R.H. (2008). Approaches to discourse analysis. In Bhatia, V.K., Flowerdew, J., & Jones, R.H. (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 1–19). London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbery, D. (2013). Bridges to global citizenship: Ecologically sustainable futures utilising children’s literature in teacher education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 29(2), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, C. (2007). Unsettling narratives: Postcolonial readings of children’s literature. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
Brundtland, G.H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on environment and development: ‘our common future’. United Nations General Assembly document A/42/427.Google Scholar
Children’s Book Council Australia. (2016). Judges Report – Book of the Year Awards 2015. Retrieved from http://readingtime.com.au/judges-report-book-of-the-year-awards-2015/ Google Scholar
Comber, B., Nixon, H., & Reid, J.-A. (2007). Environmental communications: Pedagogies of responsibility and place. In Comber, B., Nixon, H., & Reid, J.-A. (Eds.), Literacies in place: teaching environmental communications (pp. 11–23). Marrickville, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.Google Scholar
Cutter-Mackenzie, A. (2014). Where are children and young people in environmental education research? Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 30(1), 103–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Payne, P., & Reid, A. (2011). Forward: Experiencing evironment and place through children’s literature. In Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Payne, P., & Reid, A. (Eds.), Experiencing evinroment and palce through children’s literature (pp. 1–12). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Diekman, A.B., & Murnen, S.K. (2004). Learning to be little women and little men: The inequitable gender equality of nonsexist children’s literature. Sex Roles, 50(5), 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research: New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (2008). Critical discourse analysis and strategies of resistance. In Bhatia, V.K., Flowerdew, J., & Jones, R.H. (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 195–2010). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geisel, T.S. (1972). The Lorax. London, UK: Collins.Google Scholar
Gibbes, L., & King, S.M. (2014). Scary night. Adelaide, SA: Working Title Press.Google Scholar
Gleeson, L., & Blackwood, F. (2014). Go to sleep, Jessie! Richmond, Australia: Little Hare.Google Scholar
James, P. (2015). Urban sustainabilty in theory and practice – Circles of sustainability. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kirk, K.A., & Karbon, J. (1986). Environmental content in award winning children’s literature: 1960 through 1982. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(3), 1–7.10.1080/00958964.1986.9941411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, S.M. (2014). Snail and Turtle are friends. Lindfield, NSW: Scholastic Australia.Google Scholar
Knobel, M. (1998). Critical literacies in teacher education. In Knobel, M. & Healy, A. (Eds.), Critical literacies in the primary classroom (pp. 89–111). Newtown, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.Google Scholar
Madden, L., & Liang, J. (2016). Young children’s ideas about environment: Perspectives from three early childhood educational settings. Environmental Education Research, 23(8), 1055–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, K. (2016). Reconsidering children’s encounters with nature and place using posthumanism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 42–56. doi: 10.1017/aee.2015.48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCEETYA-Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2008). 2006 National Report on Schooling in Australia: Preliminary paper. Retrieved from www.mceetya.edu.au/mceetya/default.asp?id=22064 Google Scholar
Melson, G.F. (2013). Children’s ideas about the moral standing and social welfare of non-human species. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 40(4), 81–106.Google Scholar
Nicholas, M., & Paatsch, L. (2018). Mothers’ views on shared reading with their two-year olds using printed and electronic texts: Purpose, confidence and practice. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. doi: 10.1177/1468798418792614 Google Scholar
Nicholls, J., & Thorne, M. (2017). Queensland teachers’ relationship with the sustainability cross-curriculum priority. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 33(3), 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, P. (2014). Childrens’ conceptions of nature. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 30(1), 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purey, J. (2015). After nature: A politics for the anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, A., Payne, P., & Cutter-Mackenzie, A. (2011). Afterward: Openings for researching environment and place in children’s literature: Ecologies, potentials, realities and challenges. In Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Payne, P., & Reid, A. (Eds.), Experiencing environment and palce through children’s literature (pp. 177–209). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2009, 31 March–2 April). Bonn declaration. Paper presented at the World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2016). UN decade of Education for Sustainable Development 2005–2014. Retrieved from http://www.unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001399/139937e.pdf Google Scholar
UNICEF. (1989, November 17). Convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/crc/index_30160.html Google Scholar
Watson, C. (2011). Staking a small claim for fictional narratives in social and educational research. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, B.F. (2016). The pervasive whiteness of children’s literature: Collective harms and consumer obligations. Social Theory and Practice, 42(2), 367–388.10.5840/soctheorpract201642220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Conservation Union United Nations Environment Programme and World Wildlife Fund for Nature. (1991). Caring for the earth: A strategy for sustainable living. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN,UNEP and WWF.Google Scholar