Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:32:05.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Food, Obesity Discourses and the Subjugation of Environmental Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2015

Gabrielle O’Flynn*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences (Education), University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Gabrielle O’Flynn, School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong NSW 2522, Australia. Email: gabriell@uow.edu.au

Abstract

In this article, I critically analyse how meanings of health and food, tied to obesity reduction, ‘subjugate’ environmental priorities and knowledges of food. To do this, I explore the meanings of health and food constructed in the NSW Health Munch & Move program. I examine the use of language to construct notions of food and health that are not only difficult to challenge, but difficult to think otherwise, including in relation to environmental perspectives of food. I argue that as calculative and individualised conceptualisations of food and health become more and more ‘common sense’ (Mudry, 2009), there is a ‘closing off’ of what is thinkable and doable in relation to food and health. The subjugation of environmental priorities of food takes place both through their marginalisation and through how we are invited to define the place of food in our lives.

Type
Feature Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belasco, W. (2005). Food and the counterculture: A story of bread and politics. In Watson, J. & Caldwell, M. (Eds.), The cultural politics of food and eating: A reader (pp. 217234). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Berlant, L. (2010). Risky bigness: On obesity, eating, and the ambiguity of ‘health’. In Metzl, J. & Kirkland, A. (Eds.), Against health: How health became the new morality. (pp. 2639). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Burrows, L., Wright, J., & Jungersen-Smith, J. (2002). ‘Measure Your belly’: New Zealand children's constructions of health and fitness. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotty, P. (1995). Good nutrition: Facts & fashion in dietary advice. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Evans, J., Rich, E., Davies, B., & Allwood, R. (2008). Education, disordered eating and obesity discourse: Fat fabrications. Oxon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures, In Gordon, C. (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972–1977, Michel Foucault (pp. 78108). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume I: The will to knowledge. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Gard, M. (2006). HPE and the ‘obesity epidemics’. In Tinning, R., McCuaig, L., & Hunter, L. (Eds.), Teaching health and physical education in Australian schools (pp. 7887). Sydney, Australia: Pearson.Google Scholar
Gard, M., & Wright, J. (2005). The obesity epidemic: Science, morality and ideology. Oxon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruenewald, D. (2004). A Foucauldian analysis of environmental education: Toward the socioecological challenge of Earth Charter. Curriculum Inquiry, 34, 71107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthman, J. (2010). Fast food/organic food: Reflexive tastes and the making of ‘yuppie chow’. Social & Cultural Geography, 4, 4558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halse, C. (2009). Bio-citizenship: Virtue discourses and the birth of the bio-citizen. In Wright, J. & Harwood, V. (Eds.), Biopolitics and the ‘obesity epidemic’ (pp. 4559). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Healthy Kids. (2014). Munch & Move program. Retrieved from http://www.healthykids.nsw.gov.au/teachers-childcare/munch-and-move.aspxGoogle Scholar
Lebesco, K. (2010). Fat panic and the new moraliMty. In Metzl, J. & Kirkland, A. (Eds.), Against health: How health became the new morality (pp. 7282). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Monaghan, L. (2007). McDonaldizing men's bodies? Slimming, associated (ir)rationalisities and resistances. Body & Society, 13, 6793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudry, J. (2009). Measured meals: Nutrition in America. Albany: Suny Press.Google Scholar
Murray, S. (2008a). The ‘fat’ female body. New York, Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, S. (2008b). Pathologizing ‘fatness’: Medical authority and popular culture. Sociology of Sport Journal, 25, 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrykowski, B. (2004). You are what you eat: The social economy of the slow food movement. Review of Social Economy, 62, 307321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, J. & Leahy, D. (2012). School food and the pedagogies of parenting. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 52, 434459.Google Scholar
Pollan, M. (2008). In defence of food: The myth of nutrition and the pleasures of eating. London: Allen Lane Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Pollan, M. (2006). The omnivore's dilemma: A natural history of four meals. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Rich, E., & Evans, J. (2005). Making sense of eating disorders in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26, 247262.Google Scholar
Vander Schee, C. (2008). The politics of health as a school-sponsored ethic: Foucault, neoliberalism, and the unhealthy Employee. Educational Policy, 22, 854874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, R., McMahon, S., & Wright, J. (2012). The medicalisation of food pedagogies in primary schools and popular culture: A case for awakening subjugated knowledges. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33, 713728.Google Scholar
Wright, J., & Harwood, V. (Eds.). (2009). Biopolitics and the ‘obesity epidemics’. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wright, J., O’Flynn, G., & Macdonald, D. (2006). Being fit and looking healthy: Young women's and men's constructions of health and fitness. Sex Roles, 54, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar