Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T07:14:50.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Goethe's “Delicate Empiricism”: Assessing its Value for Australian Ecologists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2012

Melanie Bradley
Melanie Bradley*
Affiliation:
Environment Centre of the NT
*
†Address for correspondence: Dr. Melanie Bradley, Environment Centre of the NT, GPO Box 2120, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia. Email: policy@ecnt.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, recognised as a seminal German polymath, developed a unique approach for investigating nature, termed “delicate empiricism”. Goethe's approach uses empathy, imagination and intuition to promote a participatory engagement with the world. It goes beyond the dualistic-rationalism that defines “conventional” ecological research and can lead to novel insights. “Delicate empiricism” was applied in an ecologically-degraded agricultural landscape in the Brigalow Belt, Queensland, Australia, and its potential for increasing landscape understanding and providing a basis for land-use design was assessed. It was found that Goethe's approach led to holistic, qualitative landscape awareness, not ordinarily accessible via “conventional science”. Application of “delicate empiricism” also gave rise to a land-use design that refected the Australian-ness of the Brigalow Belt landscape, particularly the potential for recovery of native biodiversity values through retention of regrowth vegetation. Overall, the study suggested that there is merit in educating Australian ecologists about “delicate empiricism” to encourage more creative and sensitive landscape management, that is in sync with the environment.

Keywords

delicate empiricismGoetheholisticconventional scienceecologistslandscapeBrigalow
Type
Feature Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 27 , Issue 1: Special Issue: The “ness” of Environmental Education , 2011 , pp. 81 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohnet, I., & Smith, D. (2007). Planning future landscapes in the Wet Tropics of Australia: A social–ecological framework. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortoft, H. (1996). The Wholeness of Nature: Goethe's Way of Science. New York: Lindisfarne Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, M. (2006). Integration of brigalow vegetation with dryland cropping in southeast Queensland: agronomic, hydrological, ecological and Goethean perspectives. Unpublished PhD, Griffth University, Gold Coast, Australia.Google Scholar
Bradley, M., House, A., Robertson, M., & Wild, C. (2010). Vegetation succession and recovery of ecological values in the southern Queensland Brigalow Belt. Ecological Management and Restoration, 11(2), 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brook, I. (1998). Goethean science as a way to read landscapes. Landscape Research, 23, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bywater, B. (2005). Goethe: A science which does not eat the other. Janus Head, 8(1), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, J. (2005). Place, Goethe and phenomenology: A Theoretic Journey. Janus Head, 8(1), 174–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquhoun, M. (1997). An exploration into the use of Goethean science as a methodology for landscape assessment: the Pishwanton Project. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 63, 145–157.Google Scholar
Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities ]DSEWPAC]. (2011). Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla dominant and co-dominant). Retrieved from http://environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicshowcommunity.pl?id=28&status=EndangeredGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, N. (1994a). Goethe's notion of ‘theory’: Goethean phenomenology as a new ecological discipline. Unpublished Master of Science dissertation, University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury, Richmond.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, N. (1994b). Beyond constructivism: A Goethean approach to environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. (1997). The impact of clearing on brigalow communities and consequences for conservation. In Hale, P., & Lamb, D. (Eds.), Conservation outside nature reserves (pp. 359–363). Brisbane: Centre for Conservation Biology, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
Kaplan, A. (2005). Emerging out of Goethe: Conversation as a form of social inquiry. Janus Head, 8(1), 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, J., Krumhardt, K., & Zimmermann, N. (2009). The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe. Quartenary Science Reviews, 28, 3016–3034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnus, R. (1949). Goethe as a Scientist. New York: Henry Schuman.Google Scholar
Muhar, A. (2001). Three-dimensional modelling and visualisation of vegetation for landscape simulation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 5–17.Google Scholar
Reitan, P. (2005). Sustainability science - and what's needed beyond science. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy, 1, 77–80.Google Scholar
Robbins, B. (2005). New organs of perception: Goethean science as a cultural therapeutics. Janus Head, 8(1), 13–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, S. (2007). Goethean phenomenological approaches to place – developing an integral perspective of the built environment. Goethean science and art in place assessment and design. Proceedings International Human Science Research Conference – New Frontiers of Phenomenology. Italy: University of Trento.Google Scholar
Seabrook, L., McAlpine, C., & Fensham, R. (2006). Cattle, crops and clearing: regional drivers of landscape change in the Brigalow Belt, Queensland, Australia, 1840–2004. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seamon, D. (2005). Goethe's way of science as a phenomenology of nature. Janus Head, 8(1), 86–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinatra, J., & Murphy, P. (1999). Listen to the People, Listen to the Land. Carlton South: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Smeding, F., & Joenje, W. (1999). Farm-Nature Plan: Landscape ecology based farm planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 46, 109–115.Google Scholar
Tilbury, D. (2006). Environmental Education in Australia. Retrieved from http://www.environment.gov.au/soe/2006/publications/emerging/education/pubs/education.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vereijken, J., van Gelder, T., & Baars, T. (1997). Nature and landscape development on organic farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 63, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, D. (2005). “Zarte Empirie”: Goethean Science as a Way of Knowing. Janus Head, 8(1), 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar