Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:37:32.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Queensland Teachers’ Relationship With the Sustainability Cross-Curriculum Priority

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2018

Jennifer Nicholls Open the ORCID record for Jennifer Nicholls [Opens in a new window]  and
Marcia Thorne
Jennifer Nicholls*
Affiliation:
James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
Marcia Thorne
Affiliation:
James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Jennifer Nicholls, The Cairns Institute, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns Qld 4870, Australia. Email: jennifer.nicholls@my.jcu.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sustainability is a Cross-Curriculum Priority (SCCP) in the Australian Curriculum and is intended to be integrated into teaching and learning where deemed appropriate by teachers. This article explores teachers’ knowledge, understanding, and beliefs about curriculum priorities and the situational context of teaching and learning in Queensland schools. In this article we discuss the ways in which teachers describe their relationship with sustainability education and the SCCP. Data were collected from interviews with 26 Queensland teachers, teaching across all year levels from early childhood to Year 12, as part of two different PhD research projects. Queensland teachers participating in both studies indicated strong support for the inclusion of sustainability within formal curriculum; however, this strong support did not translate into practice in most cases. As a result of curriculum and policy pressures, teachers indicated that despite their belief that Education for Sustainability (EfS) is important, few believe they have the time or support for teaching EfS. The current educational context teachers have described offers limited opportunity for teachers to integrate sustainability in ways that are meaningful and relevant to their students. The SCCP did not influence planning or teaching decisions, and many teachers were unaware of its existence. Data from both studies question the adequacy of current educational policy and curriculum documents for supporting teachers to engage with sustainability education.

Keywords

cross-curriculum priorityeducation for sustainabilityteacherpolicy
Type
Feature Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 33 , Special Issue 3: 2016 Australian Association for Environmental Education Conference: ‘Tomorrow Making – Our Present to the Future’ , November 2017 , pp. 189 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.). F-10 overview. Retrieved September 14, 2016 from: http://v7-5.australiancurriculum.edu.au/curriculum/overviewGoogle Scholar
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.). Cross curriculum priorities. Overview: Sustainability. Retrieved 14 September, 2016, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/crosscurriculumpriorities/sustainability/overviewGoogle Scholar
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2015). Cross curriculum priorities. Retrieved 14 September, 2016 from: http://v7-5.australiancurriculum.edu.au/crosscurriculumprioritiesGoogle Scholar
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2016). National Assessment Program — Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN). Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/naplan.htmlGoogle Scholar
Australian Education for Sustainability Alliance (AESA). (2014). Education for Sustainability and the Australian Curriculum Project: Final Report for Research Phases 1 to 3. Retrieved from: http://aries.mq.edu.au/publications/other/Education/EfS-in-Aust-Curriculum.pdfGoogle Scholar
Barr, A., Gillard, J., Firth, V., Scrymgour, M., Welford, R., Lomax-Smith, J., . . . Constable, E. (2008). Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
Barrett, M.J. (2006). Education for the environment: action competence, becoming, and story. Environmental Education Research, 12, 503–511. doi:10.1080/13504620600799273Google Scholar
Barton, G.M., Garvis, S., & Ryan, M.E. (2014). Curriculum to the classroom: Investigating the spatial practices of curriculum implementation in Queensland schools and its implications for teacher education. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 166–177.Google Scholar
Bligh, A. (2009). New tools to boost literacy and numeracy in Qld. [Press release]. Retrieved from http://statements.qld.gov.au/Statement/Id/62435Google Scholar
Brundtland, G.H. (1985). World Commission on Environment and Development. Environmental Policy and Law, 14, 26–30.Google Scholar
Comber, B. (2012). Mandated literacy assessment and the reorganisation of teachers’ work: Federal policy, local effects. Critical Studies in Education, 53, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin Jones, L.L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 235–250.Google Scholar
Department of Education and Training (DET). (2015). Queensland Government Department of Education and Training. Curriculum into the Classroom. Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/c2c/Google Scholar
DymentJ., E. J., E., Hill, A., & Emery, S. (2015). Sustainability as a cross-curricular priority in the Australian Curriculum: A Tasmanian investigation. Environmental Education Research, 21, 1105–1126. doi:10.1080/13504622.2014.966657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N., Whitehouse, H., & Gooch, M. (2012). Barriers, successes and enabling practices of education for sustainability in far North Queensland schools: A case study. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43, 121–138.Google Scholar
Fives, H., & Buehl, M.M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the ‘messy’ construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? APA Educational Psychology Handbook, 2, 471–499.Google Scholar
Gough, A. (1997). Education and the environment: policy, trends and the problem of marginalisation. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Gough, A.G. (2013). The emergence of environmental education research: A ‘history’ of the field. In Stevenson, R.B., Wals, A., Dillon, J., & Brody, M. (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 13–22). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hardy, I. (2015). A logic of enumeration: The nature and effects of national literacy and numeracy testing in Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 30, 335–362. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.945964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzich, S., Taylor, E., & Taylor, P.C. (2015). When policy and infrastructure provisions are exemplary but still insufficient: Paradoxes affecting education for sustainability (EfS) in a custom-designed sustainability school. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 9, 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28, 27–42.Google Scholar
Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51, 129–147.Google Scholar
Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38, 355–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2013). ‘Catalyst data’: Perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling. Journal of Education Policy, 28, 634–656. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.758815Google Scholar
Masters, G. (2009). A shared challenge: Improving literacy, numeracy and science learning in Queensland primary schools. Brisbane, Australia: Education Queensland. Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/mastersreview/pdfs/final-report-masters.pdfGoogle Scholar
McGaw, B. (2014). Cross-curriculum priorities are options, not orders. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved September 5, 2016, from http://www.smh.com.au/comment/crosscurriculum-priorities-are-options-not-orders-20140226-33iae.htmlGoogle Scholar
Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polesel, J., Rice, S., & Dulfer, N. (2014). The impact of high-stakes testing on curriculum and pedagogy: A teacher perspective from Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 29, 640–657. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.865082Google Scholar
Queensland Studies Authority (QSA). (2011). Queensland response to the draft Australian Curriculum cross-curriculum priorities. Brisbane, Australia: Author. Retrieved September 14, 2016, from https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/approach2/ac_qld_response_cross_curriculum_priorities.pdfGoogle Scholar
Reid, A. (2009). Is this a revolution?: A critical analysis of the Rudd government's national education agenda. Canberra, Australia: Australian Curriculum Studies Association. Retrieved from http://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/images/ACSA%20Boomer%20address.pdfGoogle Scholar
Salter, P., & Maxwell, J. (2015). The inherent vulnerability of the Australian Curriculum's cross-curriculum priorities. Critical Studies in Education, 57, 1–17.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R.B. (1987). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. In Robottom, I. (Ed.), Environmental education: Practice and possibility (pp. 69–82). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R.B. (2007a). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. Environmental Education Research, 13, 139–153. doi:10.1080/13504620701295726Google Scholar
Stevenson, R.B. (2007b). Schooling and environmental/sustainability education: From discourses of policy and practice to discourses of professional learning. Environmental Education Research, 13, 265–285. doi:10.1080/13504620701295650Google Scholar
Stevenson, R.B. (2013). Researching tensions and pretensions in environmental/sustainability education policies. In Stevenson, R.B., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A.E.J. (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 147–162). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R.B., & Nicholls, J. (2015, November). Neoliberalism and sustainability: The challenge of climate change education in neoliberal times. Paper presented at the Neoliberalism and Contemporary Challenges for the Asia-Pacific, The Australian Sociological Association, Cairns, Queensland.Google Scholar
UNESCO. (2014). Roadmap for implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-developmentGoogle Scholar
UNWCED. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdfGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, H. (2013). Teaching climate change to the young. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/teaching-climate-change-to-the-young-13538#republishGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, H., & Evans, N. (2010). ‘I am not a greenie, but’: Negotiating a cultural discourse. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 19–31.Google Scholar