Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T22:07:06.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Extending the Teaching Competence of Urban Aboriginal Mothers”*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

M.B. Henry*
Affiliation:
University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane
Get access

Extract

The 1972–73 program entitled Extending the Teaching Competence of Urban Aboriginal Mothers, described by Watts and Henry,(1977), drew both on cultural deprivation and cultural difference theory, in a way that invites consideration of the possibility of reconciliation of these two apparently opposing positions.

First, to elucidate the program and its research bases, it aimed to enhance the prospects for school success of Grade 1 and later 4-year old Aboriginal children in Brisbane, not by focusing directly on the child in a school or pre-school setting, but by working with parent and child at home.

This focus was suggested by a number of studies in the sixties (e.g. Bernstein, 1961; Hunt, 1961; Dave, 1963; Douglas, 1964; Hess and Shipman, 1965; Coleman, 1966; Wiseman, 1967), indicating that the home is a more important determinant of school success than the school itself.

In particular, Hess,(1969) saw ten family characteristics as significant for the child’s optimal development: demand for high achievement, maximization of verbal interaction, engagement with attentiveness to the child, maternal teaching behaviour, diffuse intellectual stimulation, warm affective relationship with the child, feelings of high regard for child and self, pressure for independence and self-reliance, quality and severity of disciplinary rules, and use of conceptual rather than arbitrary regulatory strategies.

Watts, (1971) found maternal characteristics such as active interest in, and high aspirations for the child, to be more significant for the school achievement of Aboriginal than white adolescent girls.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausubel, D.P.: Maori Youth: A Psychoethnological Study of Cultural Deprivation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. N.Y., 1961.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B.: Social structure, language and learning. Educational Research, III:3, 1961.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U.: A Report of Longitudinal Evaluations of Preschool Programs. Vol.11: Is Early Instruction Effective? U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1974.Google Scholar
Coleman, J.S. et al.: Equality of Educational Opportunity. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1966.Google Scholar
Dave, R.H.: The Identification and Measurement of Environmental Process Variables That Are Related to Educational Achievement. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Univ.of Chicago, 1964.Google Scholar
Douglas, J.W.: The Home and the School. Mac Gibbon and Kee, 1964.Google Scholar
Gordon, E.W.: Parent and child centres: an invited critique. American Journal of Ortho-psychiatry, 41:1, 1971.Google Scholar
Gordon, I.J.: The Florida Parent Education Early Intervention Projects: A Longitudinal Look. College of Education, University of Illinois, 1975.Google Scholar
Hess, R.D., Parental behaviour and children’s school achievement: implications for Head Start. In Grotberg, E.(Ed.),Critical Issues in Research Relating to Disadvantaged Children. E.T.S., Princeton, N.J., 1969.Google Scholar
Hess, R.D. and Shipman, V.C: Early experience and the socialization of cognitive modes in children. Child Development, 39, 1965.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. McV.: Intelligence and Experience, Ronald, N.Y., 1961.Google Scholar
Jessor, R. and Richardson, S: Psychosocial deprivation and personality development. Perspectives of Human Deprivation: Biological, Psychological and Social. U.S. Dept. of Health, Educational Welfare, 1961.Google Scholar
Karnes, M.B. and Badger, E.F.: Training mothers to instruct their infants at home. In Karnes, M.B. (Ed.), Research and Development Program on Preschool Disadvantaged Children: Final Report. U.S. Office of Education, 1969.Google Scholar
Katz, I.: Academic motivation and early educational opportunity. Harvard Educational Review, 38:1, 1968.Google Scholar
Labov, W.: The logic of non-standard English. In Williams, F. (Ed.), Language and Poverty: Perspectives on a Theme. Chicago, Markham, 1970.Google Scholar
Levenstein, P.: Cognitive growth in pre-schools through verbal interaction with mothers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 40:3, 1970.Google Scholar
Nurcombe, B.: The Implications of Cognitive Theory for Early Childhood Education. Aust. Conference on Cognitive Development, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H.M. and Biddle, E.: Look Forward Not Back: Aborigines in Metropolitan Brisbane. ANU Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Tough, J.: The language of young children. In Chazan, M. (Ed), Education in the Early Years. University College of Swansea and Aberfan Disaster Fund, 1973.Google Scholar
Watts, B.H.: Some Determinants of the Academic Progress of Australian Adolescent Girls. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Queensland, 1971.Google Scholar
Watts, B.H.: Access to Education: An Evaluation of the Aboriginal Secondary Grants Scheme. A.G.P.S., 1976.Google Scholar
Watts, B.H. and Henry, M.: Focus on Parent/Child: Extending the Teaching Competence of Urban Aboriginal Mothers. University of Queensland. In preparation, 1977.Google Scholar
Wells, G.P: Learning to code experience through language. Child Language, 1:2.Google Scholar
Wiseman, S.: The Manchester Survey. Plowden Report, 1967.Google Scholar
Wootton, A.: Talk in the homes of young children. Sociology, 8:2, 1974.Google Scholar